• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别是STEM研究团队形成的基础。

Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups.

作者信息

Start Denon, McCauley Shannon

机构信息

Center for Population Biology UC Davis Davis CA USA.

Department of Biology University of Toronto Mississauga Mississauga ON Canada.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2020 Apr 1;10(9):3834-3843. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6188. eCollection 2020 May.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.6188
PMID:32489614
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7244806/
Abstract

Research groups are the cornerstone of scientific research, yet little is known about how these groups are formed and how their organization is influenced by the gender of the research group leader. This represents an important gap in our understanding of the processes shaping gender structure within universities and the academic fields they represent. Here, we report the results of an email survey sent to department chairs and discipline-specific listservs. We received responses from 275 female and 175 male research group leaders. Most respondents were biologists ( = 328) but psychology ( = 27), chemistry ( = 16), physics ( = 32), and mathematics ( = 30) were also relatively well represented. We found that men were self-reported as overrepresented in research groups in the physical sciences, particularly at later career stages. Within biology, male and female group leaders reported supervising a disproportionate number of same-gender trainees (students and postdoctoral fellows), particularly early in their careers. These self-reported patterns were driven primarily by gender-based differences in the pool of students applying to their research groups, while gender differences in acceptance rates played a seemingly smaller role. We discuss the implications of our results for women continuing into the professoriate and for the recruitment of young scientists into research groups.

摘要

研究团队是科学研究的基石,但对于这些团队是如何形成的,以及其组织方式如何受到团队负责人性别的影响,我们却知之甚少。这表明我们在理解塑造大学及其所代表学术领域中性别结构的过程方面存在重大差距。在此,我们报告了一项发送给系主任和特定学科邮件列表的电子邮件调查结果。我们收到了275位女性和175位男性研究团队负责人的回复。大多数受访者是生物学家(n = 328),但心理学(n = 27)、化学(n = 16)、物理学(n = 32)和数学(n = 30)领域的受访者也占了相当比例。我们发现,男性自我报告称在物理科学领域的研究团队中占比过高,尤其是在职业生涯后期。在生物学领域,男性和女性团队负责人报告称,他们所指导的同性受训人员(学生和博士后)数量不成比例,尤其是在他们职业生涯早期。这些自我报告的模式主要是由申请加入其研究团队的学生群体中的性别差异驱动的,而录取率方面的性别差异似乎起到的作用较小。我们讨论了研究结果对女性进入教授行列以及对年轻科学家加入研究团队的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4428/7244806/5be9b00d99c7/ECE3-10-3834-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4428/7244806/5ddfb7908868/ECE3-10-3834-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4428/7244806/2808a63f8fd3/ECE3-10-3834-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4428/7244806/5be9b00d99c7/ECE3-10-3834-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4428/7244806/5ddfb7908868/ECE3-10-3834-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4428/7244806/2808a63f8fd3/ECE3-10-3834-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4428/7244806/5be9b00d99c7/ECE3-10-3834-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups.性别是STEM研究团队形成的基础。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Apr 1;10(9):3834-3843. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6188. eCollection 2020 May.
2
Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.女性在学术科学界:变化中的风景。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014 Dec;15(3):75-141. doi: 10.1177/1529100614541236.
3
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
4
Biomedical Science Ph.D. Career Interest Patterns by Race/Ethnicity and Gender.按种族/民族和性别划分的生物医学科学博士职业兴趣模式。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 10;9(12):e114736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114736. eCollection 2014.
5
Postdocs as Key to Faculty Diversity: A Structured and Collaborative Approach for Research Universities.博士后是教师多元化的关键:研究型大学的结构化协作方法。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;12:759263. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759263. eCollection 2021.
6
Ten simple rules for running a successful women-in-STEM organization on an academic campus.关于在高校学术环境中成功运作女性参与 STEM 组织的 10 条简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 May 7;16(5):e1007754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007754. eCollection 2020 May.
7
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop Summary: Enhancing Opportunities for Training and Retention of a Diverse Biomedical Workforce.美国国立心肺血液研究所研讨会总结:增加培训机会并留住多元化生物医学人才队伍。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Apr;13(4):562-7. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-624OT.
8
Bourdieu, networks, and movements: Using the concepts of habitus, field and capital to understand a network analysis of gender differences in undergraduate physics.布迪厄、网络和运动:利用惯习、场域和资本的概念理解本科物理中性别差异的网络分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 12;14(9):e0222357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222357. eCollection 2019.
9
Scientists want more children.科学家想要更多孩子。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022590. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
10
Gender disparities among medical students choosing to pursue careers in medical research: a secondary cross-sectional cohort analysis.医学生选择医学研究职业的性别差异:二次横断面队列分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Nov 25;21(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-03004-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of gender on the formation and outcome of formal mentoring relationships in the life sciences.性别对生命科学中正式导师关系的形成和结果的影响。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Sep 8;20(9):e3001771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001771. eCollection 2022 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender and the Publication Output of Graduate Students: A Case Study.性别与研究生的发表产出:一项案例研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 13;11(1):e0145146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145146. eCollection 2016.
2
Compared to men, women view professional advancement as equally attainable, but less desirable.与男性相比,女性认为职业晋升同样可以实现,但吸引力较小。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 6;112(40):12354-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502567112. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
3
The bachelor's to Ph.D. STEM pipeline no longer leaks more women than men: a 30-year analysis.
本科到博士的 STEM 管道不再有更多女性流失:一项 30 年的分析。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 17;6:37. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00037. eCollection 2015.
4
Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines.对杰出表现的期望是造成各学术领域性别分布差异的原因之一。
Science. 2015 Jan 16;347(6219):262-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1261375.
5
Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women.生命科学领域的杰出男性教职人员雇用的女性较少。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 15;111(28):10107-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403334111. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
6
Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science.性别多元化的工作团队能产出质量更高的科研成果。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e79147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079147. eCollection 2013.
7
Feeding the pipeline: Gender, occupational plans, and college major selection.输送管道:性别、职业规划与大学专业选择
Soc Sci Res. 2013 Jul;42(4):989-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.03.008. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
8
Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students.理科教员微妙的性别偏见偏爱男学生。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 9;109(41):16474-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
9
Leaks in the pipeline: separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia.管道泄漏:从人口统计学惯性中分离出学术界持续存在的性别差异。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Sep 22;279(1743):3736-41. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0822. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
10
Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards.种族、民族与 NIH 研究奖项。
Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):1015-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1196783.