Zélé Flore, Altıntaş Mustafa, Santos Inês, Cakmak Ibrahim, Magalhães Sara
Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c) Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa Lisboa Portugal.
Department of Plant Protection Faculty of Agriculture Adnan Menderes University Aydin Turkey.
Ecol Evol. 2020 Mar 28;10(9):3868-3880. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6015. eCollection 2020 May.
Many studies have revealed the ability of the endosymbiotic bacterium to protect its arthropod hosts against diverse pathogens. However, as may also increase the susceptibility of its host to infection, predicting the outcome of a particular -host-pathogen interaction remains elusive. Yet, understanding such interactions and their eco-evolutionary consequences is crucial for disease and pest control strategies. Moreover, how natural infections affect artificially introduced pathogens for biocontrol has never been studied. spider mites are herbivorous crop pests, causing severe damage on numerous economically important crops. Due to the rapid evolution of pesticide resistance, biological control strategies using entomopathogenic fungi are being developed. However, although spider mites are infected with various strains worldwide, whether this endosymbiont protects them from fungi is as yet unknown. Here, we compared the survival of two populations, treated with antibiotics or naturally harboring different strains, after exposure to the fungal biocontrol agents and . To control for potential effects of the bacterial community of spider mites, we also compared the susceptibility of two populations naturally uninfected by , treated with antibiotics or not. In one population, -infected mites had a better survival than uninfected ones in absence of fungi but not in their presence, whereas in the other population increased the mortality induced by . In one naturally -uninfected population, the antibiotic treatment increased the susceptibility of spider mites to , but it had no effect in the other treatments. These results suggest that natural infections may not hamper and may even improve the success of biological control using entomopathogenic fungi. However, they also draw caution on the generalization of such effects, given the complexity of within-host-pathogens interaction and the potential eco-evolutionary consequences of the use of biocontrol agents for -host associations.
许多研究揭示了内共生细菌保护其节肢动物宿主抵御多种病原体的能力。然而,由于其也可能增加宿主对感染的易感性,预测特定宿主 - 病原体相互作用的结果仍然难以捉摸。然而,了解此类相互作用及其生态进化后果对于疾病和害虫控制策略至关重要。此外,自然感染如何影响用于生物防治的人工引入病原体从未得到研究。叶螨是食草性作物害虫,对许多经济上重要的作物造成严重损害。由于抗药性的迅速进化,正在开发使用昆虫病原真菌的生物防治策略。然而,尽管全球范围内叶螨感染了各种菌株,但这种内共生体是否能保护它们免受真菌侵害尚不清楚。在这里,我们比较了用抗生素处理或自然携带不同菌株的两个种群在接触真菌生物防治剂和后存活情况。为了控制叶螨细菌群落的潜在影响,我们还比较了两个未自然感染的种群(分别用或不用抗生素处理)对的易感性。在一个种群中,在没有真菌的情况下,感染的螨比未感染的螨存活得更好,但在有真菌的情况下并非如此,而在另一个种群中增加了由诱导的死亡率。在一个自然未感染的种群中,抗生素处理增加了叶螨对的易感性,但在其他处理中没有效果。这些结果表明,自然感染可能不会阻碍甚至可能提高使用昆虫病原真菌进行生物防治的成功率。然而,鉴于宿主内病原体相互作用的复杂性以及使用生物防治剂对宿主关联的潜在生态进化后果,它们也提醒人们对此类效应的普遍性要谨慎对待。