Clinical outcomes following arthroscopic repair of articular vs. bursal partial-thickness rotator cuff tears with follow-up of 2 years or more.

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis and treatment of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears remain controversial, and only a few studies have carried out clinical evaluation and comparison based on different types of tears. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic cuff repairs using the suture bridge technique in patients with articular partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (APRCTs) vs. those with bursal partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (BPRCTs).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 29 patients with APRCTs and 22 patients with BPRCTs who underwent arthroscopic cuff repair using the suture bridge technique with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the visual analog scale score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Constant score (CS), active range of motion (ROM) of shoulder flexion and abduction, improvement rate for each score, and retear rate.

RESULTS

The APRCT group had more women, fewer cases of subacromial decompression, and more patients whose condition changed intraoperatively and transitioned into a complete tear. Preoperatively, the JOA score, CS, ROM of shoulder flexion, ROM of shoulder abduction, and external shoulder rotation strength were lower in the APRCT group. Postoperatively, all scores improved significantly in both groups, and the JOA score, CS, and external shoulder rotation strength remained significantly lower in the APRCT group. Improvement and retear rates were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The suture bridge technique significantly improved the clinical outcomes of patients with APRCTs and BPRCTs. Preoperative and postoperative functional parameters were worse in APRCT patients.