Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eulji University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Clin Orthop Surg. 2013 Dec;5(4):306-13. doi: 10.4055/cios.2013.5.4.306. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
We retrospectively assessed the clinical outcomes and investigated risk factors influencing retear after arthroscopic suture bridge repair technique for rotator cuff tear through clinical assessment and magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA).
Between January 2008 and April 2011, sixty-two cases of full-thickness rotator cuff tear were treated with arthroscopic suture bridge repair technique and follow-up MRA were performed. The mean age was 56.1 years, and mean follow-up period was 27.4 months. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using range of motion, Korean shoulder score, Constant score, and UCLA score. Radiological outcome was evaluated with preoperative and follow-up MRA. Potential predictive factors that influenced cuff retear, such as age, gender, geometric patterns of tear, size of cuff tear, acromioplasty, fatty degeneration, atrophy of cuff muscle, retraction of supraspinatus, involved muscles of cuff and osteolysis around the suture anchor were evaluated.
Thirty cases (48.4%) revealed retear on MRA. In univariable analysis, retear was significantly more frequent in over 60 years age group (62.5%) than under 60 years age group (39.5%; p = 0.043), and also in medium to large-sized tear than small-sized tear (p = 0.003). There was significant difference in geometric pattern of tear (p = 0.015). In multivariable analysis, only age (p = 0.036) and size of tear (p = 0.030) revealed a significant difference. The mean active range of motion for forward flexion, abduction, external rotation at the side and internal rotation at the side were significantly improved at follow-up (p < 0.05). The mean Korean shoulder score, Constant score, and UCLA score increased significantly at follow-up (p < 0.01). The range of motion, Korean shoulder score, Constant score, and UCLA score did not differ significantly between the groups with retear and intact repairs (p > 0.05). The locations of retear were insertion site in 10 cases (33.3%) and musculotendinous junction in 20 cases (66.7%; p = 0.006).
Suture bridge repair technique for rotator cuff tear showed improved clinical results. Cuff integrity after repair did not affect clinical results. Age of over 60 years and size of cuff tear larger than 1 cm were factors influencing rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic suture bridge repair technique.
我们通过临床评估和磁共振关节造影术(MRA)回顾性评估关节镜下缝合桥修复技术治疗肩袖全层撕裂的临床效果,并探讨影响撕裂再发的相关因素。
2008 年 1 月至 2011 年 4 月,采用关节镜下缝合桥修复技术治疗 62 例全层肩袖撕裂患者,术后均行 MRA 随访。患者的平均年龄为 56.1 岁,平均随访时间为 27.4 个月。采用肩关节活动度、韩国肩关节评分、Constant 评分和 UCLA 评分评估临床和功能结果。通过术前和随访 MRA 评估影像学结果。评估了影响肩袖再撕裂的潜在预测因素,如年龄、性别、撕裂的几何形态、肩袖撕裂的大小、肩峰成形术、脂肪变性、肩袖肌肉萎缩、冈上肌回缩、肩袖肌肉受累及缝线锚定周围的骨溶解等。
30 例(48.4%)在 MRA 上显示再撕裂。单变量分析显示,60 岁以上年龄组的再撕裂发生率(62.5%)明显高于 60 岁以下年龄组(39.5%;p = 0.043),中大型撕裂组也明显高于小型撕裂组(p = 0.003)。撕裂的几何形态有显著差异(p = 0.015)。多变量分析显示,仅年龄(p = 0.036)和撕裂大小(p = 0.030)有显著差异。随访时,前屈、外展、侧方外旋和内旋的主动活动范围均显著改善(p < 0.05)。随访时,韩国肩关节评分、Constant 评分和 UCLA 评分均显著升高(p < 0.01)。再撕裂组和完整修复组之间的活动范围、韩国肩关节评分、Constant 评分和 UCLA 评分差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。再撕裂的部位为 10 例(33.3%)插入部位和 20 例(66.7%)肌腱肌腹交界处(p = 0.006)。
关节镜下缝合桥修复技术治疗肩袖撕裂可获得较好的临床效果。修复后肩袖的完整性并不影响临床效果。60 岁以上和肩袖撕裂大于 1cm 是影响关节镜下缝合桥修复技术治疗肩袖撕裂再撕裂的因素。