• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因果推断和参考臂风险调整在间接治疗比较荟萃分析中的应用。

Causal inference and adjustment for reference-arm risk in indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis.

机构信息

Analysis Group Inc., Boston, MA 02199, USA.

US HEOR, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ 08648, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Jul;9(10):737-750. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0042. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

DOI:10.2217/cer-2020-0042
PMID:32490682
Abstract

To illustrate that bias associated with indirect treatment comparison and network meta-analyses can be reduced by adjusting for outcomes on common reference arms. Approaches to adjusting for reference-arm effects are presented within a causal inference framework. Bayesian and Frequentist approaches are applied to three real data examples. Reference-arm adjustment can significantly impact estimated treatment differences, improve model fit and align indirectly estimated treatment effects with those observed in randomized trials. Reference-arm adjustment can possibly reverse the direction of estimated treatment effects. Accumulating theoretical and empirical evidence underscores the importance of adjusting for reference-arm outcomes in indirect treatment comparison and network meta-analyses to make full use of data and reduce the risk of bias in estimated treatments effects.

摘要

为了说明通过调整共同参照臂的结局,可以减少间接治疗比较和网络荟萃分析中的偏倚。在因果推理框架内提出了调整参照臂效应的方法。贝叶斯和频率派方法应用于三个真实数据实例。参照臂调整可显著影响估计的治疗差异,改善模型拟合,并使间接估计的治疗效果与随机试验中观察到的效果一致。参照臂调整可能会改变估计的治疗效果的方向。理论和经验证据的积累强调了在间接治疗比较和网络荟萃分析中调整参照臂结局的重要性,以便充分利用数据并降低估计治疗效果的偏倚风险。

相似文献

1
Causal inference and adjustment for reference-arm risk in indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis.因果推断和参考臂风险调整在间接治疗比较荟萃分析中的应用。
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Jul;9(10):737-750. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0042. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
2
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
3
A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods in random-effects network meta-analysis of binary data.贝叶斯和频率派方法在二分类数据随机效应网络荟萃分析中的比较。
Res Synth Methods. 2020 May;11(3):363-378. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1397. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
4
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
5
Prophylactic antibiotics for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a network meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病成人患者的预防性抗生素治疗:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 15;1(1):CD013198. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013198.pub2.
6
Examining the bias-efficiency tradeoff from incorporation of nonconcurrent controls in platform trials: A simulation study example from the adaptive COVID-19 treatment trial.考察平台试验中纳入非同期对照所带来的偏倚-效率权衡:来自适应性COVID-19治疗试验的模拟研究示例
Clin Trials. 2025 Feb 8:17407745251313928. doi: 10.1177/17407745251313928.
7
Using structural equation modeling for network meta-analysis.使用结构方程模型进行网络荟萃分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jul 14;17(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0390-9.
8
Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.与随机试验中评估的医疗保健结果相比,观察性研究设计评估的医疗保健结果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):MR000034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub2.
9
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
10
Node-Splitting Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Evaluation of Inconsistency in Network Meta-Analysis.用于评估网络荟萃分析中不一致性的节点拆分广义线性混合模型
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):957-963. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool).方法学综述 NMA 偏倚概念为开发新的网络荟萃分析(RoB NMA 工具)偏倚风险工具中潜在概念清单奠定基础。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 12;13(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02388-x.