Korea Institute of Sport Science, Seoul 01794, Korea.
College of Sport Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 1;17(11):3927. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113927.
The purpose of this study was to compare the patterns of skill actions executed during Taekwondo competitions when wearing and not wearing an electronic protector. To achieve this purpose, 110 matches from two university-level Taekwondo championships were taped and analyzed. The performance skills were composed of 18 detailed skills and grouped into five categories by considering kicks to the target area (chest or head/face). The data were organized in the form of a contingency table that demonstrated the relationship between grouping factors (skills, protectors, win-lose, and weight division). A log-linear analysis was carried out to investigate the effect of the grouping factors (IVs) on the skills (DV) using SPSS Statistics. The results obtained in the present study can be summarized as follows. First, the overall proportion of "points" called by the judge for the general protector (32.3%) was approximately 3.4 times that for the electronic protector (9.5%). Second, for the electronic protector, the proportions of kicks to the chest area were in the following order: Roundhouse kick (R-Kick) (44.7%), Pushing kick (P-kick) (19.3%), Turn kick (T-kick) (8.7%), and Double roundhouse kick (DR-kick) (7.6%). For the general protector, the order differed slightly, with T-kick and P-kick switched around with different proportions. Third, the proportion of kicks to the head/face was higher for the electronic protector (19.8%) than for the general protector (10.4%), and this difference was even more distinct when the light (-68kg) (33.5% (electronic) vs. 6.5% (general)) and heavy (+85kg) (1.4% (electronic) vs. 13.3% (general)) weight divisions were compared. Finally, the match status (win/lose) had no significant effect on the pattern of playing actions for both the protectors. The result from this study suggests that skill frequency of linear simple movement for activating electrical protector's sensor is increased, while the one of rotational complex movement is decreased gradually. Additionally, headgear without sensors, such as for a hit movement to the face/head part, represent characteristics of increased attack skills to the facial area; these scores are provided through subjective judgement, and consequently changes in performance skills can occur.
本研究旨在比较跆拳道比赛中穿着和不穿着电子护具时技能动作的模式。为了达到这个目的,从两个大学跆拳道锦标赛中录制并分析了 110 场比赛。表现技能由 18 个详细技能组成,并考虑到踢向目标区域(胸部或头部/面部),将其分为五类。数据以展示分组因素(技能、护具、胜负和体重分级)之间关系的列联表形式组织。使用 SPSS Statistics 对数线性分析研究了分组因素(IVs)对技能(DV)的影响。本研究的结果可概括如下。首先,裁判员对通用护具(32.3%)的“得分”总体比例约为电子护具(9.5%)的 3.4 倍。其次,对于电子护具,踢向胸部区域的比例如下:旋踢(R-Kick)(44.7%)、推踢(P-kick)(19.3%)、转踢(T-kick)(8.7%)和双旋踢(DR-kick)(7.6%)。对于通用护具,比例略有不同,T 踢和 P 踢的比例略有不同。第三,电子护具踢向头部/面部的比例(19.8%)高于通用护具(10.4%),当比较轻量级(-68kg)(电子护具 33.5%(电子护具)与通用护具 6.5%(通用护具))和重量级(+85kg)(电子护具 1.4%(电子护具)与通用护具 13.3%(通用护具))时,这种差异更加明显。最后,比赛状态(胜/负)对两种护具的比赛动作模式均无显著影响。本研究结果表明,为了激活电子护具传感器而进行的线性简单运动的技能频率增加,而旋转复杂运动的技能频率逐渐减少。此外,没有传感器的头盔,例如对脸部/头部的击打动作,代表着增加对脸部区域的攻击技能的特征;这些分数是通过主观判断给出的,因此,技能表现可能会发生变化。