• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测急诊科脓毒症预后的qSOFA评分

qSOFA score for prediction of sepsis outcome in emergency department.

作者信息

Shahsavarinia Kavous, Moharramzadeh Payman, Arvanagi Reza Jamal, Mahmoodpoor Ata

机构信息

Kavous Shahsavarinia, Associate Professor, Road Traffic Injury Research Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Payman Moharramzadeh, Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2020 May-Jun;36(4):668-672. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.4.2031.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.36.4.2031
PMID:32494253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7260919/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The third international consensus definition for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis 3) task force recently introduced qSOFA (quick sequential organ failure assessment) as a score for detection of patients at risk of sepsis outside of intensive care units. We performed this study to evaluate the validity of qSOFA for early detection and risk stratification of septic patients in emergency department.

METHODS

We conducted this study in an emergency department of the largest university affiliated hospital in northwest of Iran from Sept 2015 to Sept 2016. One hundred and forty patients who were SIRS positive with a suspected infection without alternative diagnosis and a microbiological proven infection were enrolled in this study. qSOFA was calculated for each patient and correlated with sepsis grades and mortality.

RESULTS

From 140 patients 84 (60%) had positive qSOFA score and 56 (40%) patients had negative qSOFA score. Our results showed that near half of patients with positive qSOFA expired during their stay in hospital while this was about 5% for patients with negative qSOFA. ROC curve of study regarding prediction of outcome with qSOFA showed an area under curve of 0.59. ( value: 0.04). Time spent to sepsis detection was 16 minutes shorter with qSOFA score compared to SIRS criteria in this study.

CONCLUSION

In patients with suspected sepsis, qSOFA has acceptable value for risk stratification of severity, multi organ failure and mortality. It seems that education of medical staff and frequent screening of patients for warning signs can help to increase the value of qSOFA in prediction of mortality in critically ill septic patients.

摘要

目的

脓毒症和脓毒性休克的第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症3)工作组最近引入了qSOFA(快速序贯器官衰竭评估)作为在重症监护病房之外检测有脓毒症风险患者的评分系统。我们开展本研究以评估qSOFA在急诊科对脓毒症患者进行早期检测和风险分层的有效性。

方法

我们于2015年9月至2016年9月在伊朗西北部最大的大学附属医院的急诊科开展了本研究。140例符合全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)阳性、疑似感染且无其他诊断、微生物学证实感染的患者纳入本研究。计算每位患者的qSOFA评分,并将其与脓毒症分级和死亡率相关联。

结果

140例患者中,84例(60%)qSOFA评分阳性,56例(40%)患者qSOFA评分阴性。我们的结果显示,qSOFA评分阳性的患者近一半在住院期间死亡,而qSOFA评分阴性的患者这一比例约为5%。本研究中关于用qSOFA预测结局的ROC曲线显示曲线下面积为0.59(P值:0.04)。与SIRS标准相比,本研究中使用qSOFA评分检测脓毒症的时间缩短了16分钟。

结论

在疑似脓毒症患者中,qSOFA在严重程度、多器官衰竭和死亡率的风险分层方面具有可接受的价值。对医务人员进行教育以及对患者进行频繁的警示体征筛查似乎有助于提高qSOFA在预测重症脓毒症患者死亡率方面的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcbb/7260919/b460ab9e46b5/PJMS-36-668-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcbb/7260919/b460ab9e46b5/PJMS-36-668-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcbb/7260919/b460ab9e46b5/PJMS-36-668-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
qSOFA score for prediction of sepsis outcome in emergency department.用于预测急诊科脓毒症预后的qSOFA评分
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 May-Jun;36(4):668-672. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.4.2031.
2
Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit.qSOFA与SIRS用于预测非重症监护病房疑似脓毒症患者不良结局的比较。
Crit Care. 2017 Mar 26;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5.
3
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.
4
Prognostic Accuracy of Sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Suspected Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department.Sepsis-3 标准对急诊科疑似感染患者住院死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):301-308. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20329.
5
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
6
[Diagnosis accuracy of quick sequential organ failure assessment score for adult sepsis patient with soft tissue infection].[快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分对成人软组织感染性脓毒症患者的诊断准确性]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Aug;31(8):933-937. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.08.004.
7
Validation of 'Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score' as a Screening Tool for Early Identification of Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department.“快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分”作为急诊科脓毒症患者早期识别筛查工具的验证
Cureus. 2023 May 19;15(5):e39251. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39251. eCollection 2023 May.
8
Validation of prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among cardiac-, thoracic-, and vascular-surgery patients admitted to a cardiothoracic intensive care unit.入住心胸重症监护病房的心脏、胸科和血管手术患者中,序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准及快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分对院内死亡率预后准确性的验证。
J Card Surg. 2020 Jan;35(1):118-127. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14331. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
9
Sepsis patients in the emergency department: stratification using the Clinical Impression Score, Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction score or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score?急诊科脓毒症患者:使用临床印象评分、易感性、感染、反应和器官功能障碍评分或快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分进行分层?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;25(5):328-334. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000460.
10
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.

引用本文的文献

1
Lactate-albumin ratio improves combined predictive value of qSOFA and MEWS for 30-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis: A retrospective cohort study.乳酸-白蛋白比值提高qSOFA和MEWS对脓毒症重症监护病房患者30天死亡率的联合预测价值:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 4;104(27):e43097. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043097.
2
Comparison of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) Score With the Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS) and Rockall Score (RS) in Predicting the Need for Intensive Care Among Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients.快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分与格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分(GBS)及罗卡尔评分(RS)在预测急性上消化道出血患者重症监护需求方面的比较
Cureus. 2025 Mar 15;17(3):e80613. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80613. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of qSOFA and SOFA score for predicting mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock patients in the emergency department of a low middle income country.在一个低收入中等收入国家的急诊科,比较qSOFA和SOFA评分对预测严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者死亡率的作用。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 27;18(4):148-151. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.002. eCollection 2018 Dec.
2
Rethinking the concept of sepsis and septic shock.重新思考脓毒症和脓毒性休克的概念。
Eur J Intern Med. 2018 Aug;54:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
3
Association of the Quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) Score With Excess Hospital Mortality in Adults With Suspected Infection in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
Predictive and Prognostic Importance of National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) in Emergency Room Patients.国家早期预警评分2(NEWS2)在急诊患者中的预测和预后重要性
Cureus. 2025 Feb 24;17(2):e79538. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79538. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Factors associated with contrast-associated acute kidney injury in an emergency department: A cohort study in Lebanon.急诊科中与对比剂相关急性肾损伤相关的因素:黎巴嫩的一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 13;20(3):e0316604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316604. eCollection 2025.
5
The effect of serum cortisol level on the outcomes of Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression and Catabolism Syndrome patients in the intensive care unit.血清皮质醇水平对重症监护病房中持续性炎症、免疫抑制和分解代谢综合征患者预后的影响。
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Feb;41(2):542-547. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.2.10256.
6
Taenia saginata infection: A rare case of jejunal perforations from Ethiopia: A case report.牛带绦虫感染:一例来自埃塞俄比亚的空肠穿孔罕见病例:病例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Feb;127:110974. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.110974. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
7
The Usefulness of Strain Echocardiography as Diagnostic and Prognostic Index of Cardiac Dysfunction in Septic Patients in Correlation with Cardiac Biomarkers.应变超声心动图作为脓毒症患者心脏功能障碍的诊断和预后指标与心脏生物标志物的相关性研究
J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2024 Jul-Sep;34(3):114-119. doi: 10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_22_24. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
8
Plasma-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) as biomarkers of sepsis in burn patients via label-free Raman spectroscopy.基于无标记拉曼光谱的血浆衍生细胞外囊泡(EVs)作为烧伤患者脓毒症的生物标志物。
J Extracell Vesicles. 2024 Sep;13(9):e12506. doi: 10.1002/jev2.12506.
9
Impact of premorbid use of beta‑blockers on survival outcomes of patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.病前使用β受体阻滞剂对脓毒症患者生存结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2024 May 24;28(1):300. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12589. eCollection 2024 Jul.
10
Plasma-derived Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) as Biomarkers of Sepsis in Burn Patients via Label-free Raman Spectroscopy.通过无标记拉曼光谱法检测烧伤患者血浆来源的细胞外囊泡作为脓毒症生物标志物
bioRxiv. 2024 May 15:2024.05.14.593634. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.14.593634.
快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分与中低收入国家疑似感染成人医院过度死亡率的关系。
JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2202-2211. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6229.
4
Comparison of qSOFA with current emergency department tools for screening of patients with sepsis for critical illness.qSOFA 与现有急诊科工具在筛查脓毒症患者是否发生重症的比较。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jun;35(6):350-356. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207383. Epub 2018 May 2.
5
Accuracy of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection: a meta-analysis of observational studies.快速序贯器官衰竭评估 (qSOFA) 评分和全身性炎症反应综合征 (SIRS) 标准对疑似感染住院患者死亡率预测的准确性:观察性研究的荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Nov;24(11):1123-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.032. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
6
A Comparison of the Quick-SOFA and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria for the Diagnosis of Sepsis and Prediction of Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估与全身性炎症反应综合征标准对脓毒症诊断及死亡率预测的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chest. 2018 Mar;153(3):646-655. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.12.015. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
7
Assessment of mortality by qSOFA in patients with sepsis outside ICU: A post hoc subgroup analysis by the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Sepsis Registry Study Group.非重症监护病房脓毒症患者中采用qSOFA评估死亡率:日本急性医学协会脓毒症注册研究组的事后亚组分析
J Infect Chemother. 2017 Nov;23(11):757-762. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
8
Revised National Estimates of Emergency Department Visits for Sepsis in the United States.美国脓毒症急诊就诊情况的修订后全国估算数据。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;45(9):1443-1449. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002538.
9
Application of the qSOFA score to predict mortality in patients with suspected infection in a resource-limited setting in Malawi.qSOFA 评分在马拉维资源有限环境下疑似感染患者中的死亡率预测中的应用。
Infection. 2017 Dec;45(6):893-896. doi: 10.1007/s15010-017-1057-5. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
10
The recognition and management of sepsis and septic shock: a guide for non-intensivists.脓毒症和脓毒性休克的识别与管理:非重症医学科医生指南
Postgrad Med J. 2017 Oct;93(1104):626-634. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134519. Epub 2017 Jul 29.