Falavigna Asdrubal, Dedea Jefferson, Guiroy Alfredo, Brodano Giovanni Barbanti
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Laboratory of Clinical Studies and Basic Models on Spinal Cord Pathologies, University of Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Surg Neurol Int. 2020 May 2;11:88. doi: 10.25259/SNI_34_2019. eCollection 2020.
The perception of major versus minor complications may vary according to surgeons, institutions, and different specialties. Here, we analyzed the geographic distribution of the different types/severities of the most frequent complications in spinal surgery, and assessed how the perception of spine surgeons about postoperative complications differed.
We performed a cross-sectional study using a questionnaire, we developed to encompass different clinical scenarios of surgeons' perceptions of spine surgery complications. The survey involved the members of AOSpine Latin America (LA) (January 28, 2017-March 15, 2017). The main variables studied included: specialty, age, years of experience, country, individual surgeon's perception of different clinical scenarios, and the surgeon's classification of complications for each scenario (e.g., major, minor, or none). Our results from LA were then analyzed and compared to North American (NA) responses.
Orthopedic surgeons represented about 58.2% ( = 412) of the 708 questionnaires answered. Of interest, 45.6% ( = 323) of those responding had >10 years of experience. The countries analyzed included Brazil (31.5%), Mexico (17.5%), Argentina (14.4%), Colombia (8.0%), and Venezuela (7.6%). Four of the 11 scenarios showed consensus in the results (e.g., average being over 82.5%). A tendency toward consensus was present in 45.4% of the clinical cases, while two out of 11 clinical cases did not present a consensus among surgeons. Of interest, the perception of complications was similar between cohorts (LA 85% vs. NA 80%).
Significant consensus in the perception of complications was observed in most of the analyzed scenarios for both LA and NA. However, within the LA data, responses to different clinical scenarios varied.
对于严重并发症与轻微并发症的认知可能因外科医生、机构及不同专业而异。在此,我们分析了脊柱手术中最常见并发症的不同类型/严重程度的地理分布,并评估了脊柱外科医生对术后并发症的认知差异。
我们使用一份问卷进行了一项横断面研究,该问卷旨在涵盖外科医生对脊柱手术并发症认知的不同临床情况。该调查涉及拉丁美洲AOSpine(LA)的成员(2017年1月28日至2017年3月15日)。研究的主要变量包括:专业、年龄、经验年限、国家、个体外科医生对不同临床情况的认知,以及外科医生对每种情况并发症的分类(例如,严重、轻微或无)。然后分析我们来自LA的结果并与北美(NA)的回复进行比较。
在708份回答的问卷中,骨科医生约占58.2%(n = 412)。有趣的是,45.6%(n = 323)的回复者有超过10年的经验。分析的国家包括巴西(31.5%)、墨西哥(17.5%)、阿根廷(14.4%)、哥伦比亚(8.0%)和委内瑞拉(7.6%)。11种情况中有4种在结果上显示出一致性(例如,平均超过82.5%)。45.4%的临床病例存在趋于一致的趋势,而11种临床病例中有2种在外科医生之间未达成共识。有趣的是,两组人群对并发症的认知相似(LA为85%,NA为80%)。
在LA和NA的大多数分析情况下,对并发症的认知都观察到了显著的一致性。然而,在LA的数据中,对不同临床情况的回复有所不同。