Lebude Bryan, Yadla Sanjay, Albert Todd, Anderson David G, Harrop James S, Hilibrand Alan, Maltenfort Mitchel, Sharan Ashwini, Vaccaro Alexander R, Ratliff John K
Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Dec;23(8):493-500. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181c11f89.
Survey of neurosurgical and orthopedic spine surgeons.
To define the "complications of spinal surgery," we surveyed a large group of practicing spine surgeons to establish a preliminary definition of perioperative complications.
Although the risk of complications following spinal procedures plays an important role in determining the appropriateness of surgical intervention, there is little consensus among spine surgeons regarding the definition of complications in spine surgery. The relevance of medical complications is also not clearly defined.
We surveyed a cohort of practicing spine surgeons via email and a commercially maintained website. Surgeons were presented with various complication scenarios, and asked to assess the presence or absence of a complication, as well as complication severity, with responses limited to "major complication" and "minor complication/adverse event."
The survey was sent to approximately 2000 practicing surgeons; complete responses were received from 229, giving a response rate of 11.4%. Orthopedic surgeons comprised the majority of respondents (73%); most surgeons reported being in practice for greater than 5 years (83%). Greater than 75% of surgeons agreed on complication presence or absence in 10 of 11 scenarios assessed (91%, P<0.05). Consensus (≥70% agreement, P<0.05) as to type of complication was found in 7 of 11 scenarios presented (64%). Events deemed major complications involved either severe medical adverse events with permanent sequela or events requiring return to the operating room. Surgeons consistently considered medical adverse events, whether or not directly related to surgery, relevant to complication assessment.
We present a practical binary definition of complications in spine surgery based upon a survey of over 200 practicing spine surgeons. Further work is required in critically assessing spine surgery complications.
对神经外科和骨科脊柱外科医生进行调查。
为明确“脊柱手术并发症”,我们对一大批执业脊柱外科医生进行了调查,以确立围手术期并发症的初步定义。
尽管脊柱手术后并发症的风险在确定手术干预的适宜性方面起着重要作用,但脊柱外科医生对于脊柱手术并发症的定义几乎没有共识。医疗并发症的相关性也未得到明确界定。
我们通过电子邮件和一个商业维护的网站对一批执业脊柱外科医生进行了调查。向外科医生展示了各种并发症情况,并要求他们评估是否存在并发症以及并发症的严重程度,回答限于“主要并发症”和“轻微并发症/不良事件”。
调查发送给了约2000名执业外科医生;收到229份完整回复,回复率为11.4%。骨科医生占受访者的大多数(73%);大多数外科医生报告执业超过5年(83%)。在评估的11种情况中的10种(91%,P<0.05),超过75%的外科医生对并发症的有无达成了一致。在所呈现的11种情况中的7种(64%),对于并发症类型达成了共识(≥70%的一致性,P<0.05)。被视为主要并发症的事件包括伴有永久性后遗症的严重医疗不良事件或需要返回手术室的事件。外科医生一直认为医疗不良事件,无论是否与手术直接相关,都与并发症评估相关。
基于对200多名执业脊柱外科医生的调查,我们提出了脊柱手术并发症的实用二元定义。在严格评估脊柱手术并发症方面还需要进一步开展工作。