Khattak Mohammad Fawad, Horne Sebastian
Cardiology, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, GBR.
Cureus. 2020 May 1;12(5):e7908. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7908.
Objective To assess the diagnostic performance of CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and to assess whether its use in addition to CT coronary angiography (CTCA) changed the investigation and management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Method A retrospective case note review was carried out for 200 consecutive patients at Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, United Kingdom, who had CTCA sent for Heartflow CT-FFR analysis (HeartFlow, Redwood City, CA) between January 2018 and December 2019. Results Patients with CT-FFR > 0.8 were significantly less likely to require further investigation with coronary angiography (p: < 0.00001) than those with CT-FFR < 0.8. The use of CT-FFR significantly reduced need for further functional imaging (6% vs 26%) (p: 0.00012). A total of 15 patients in this study had both a CT-FFR and an invasive FFR measured, with seven (46.66%) of the CT-FFRs correlating with the invasive FFR. Approximately 54% of patients who had a CT-FFR < 0.8 were found to have an invasive FFR of >0.8. Of the 56 patients who underwent coronary angiography, the CT Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) and angiography CAD-RADS were the same in 66% of the cases with 82% of CT CAD-RADS results being within ±1 of the angiography CAD-RADS. Conclusion The use of CT-FFR alongside CTCA led to a significant reduction in need for coronary angiography and functional testing. Further studies are required to look at the diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR in direct comparison with invasive FFR.
目的 评估CT血流储备分数(CT-FFR)的诊断性能,并评估在CT冠状动脉造影(CTCA)基础上使用CT-FFR是否会改变疑似冠心病(CAD)患者的检查和治疗。方法 对英国达德利拉塞尔霍尔医院2018年1月至2019年12月期间连续200例接受CTCA并送检进行Heartflow CT-FFR分析(HeartFlow,加利福尼亚州红木城)的患者进行回顾性病例记录审查。结果 CT-FFR>0.8的患者比CT-FFR<0.8的患者需要进一步进行冠状动脉造影检查的可能性显著降低(p:<0.00001)。CT-FFR的使用显著减少了进一步功能成像的需求(6%对26%)(p:0.00012)。本研究共有15例患者同时测量了CT-FFR和有创FFR,其中7例(46.66%)的CT-FFR与有创FFR相关。CT-FFR<0.8的患者中约54%被发现有创FFR>0.8。在接受冠状动脉造影的56例患者中,66%的病例中CT冠状动脉疾病报告和数据系统(CAD-RADS)与血管造影CAD-RADS相同,82%的CT CAD-RADS结果在血管造影CAD-RADS的±1范围内。结论 CTCA联合使用CT-FFR可显著减少冠状动脉造影和功能测试的需求。需要进一步研究以直接比较CT-FFR与有创FFR的诊断准确性。