• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在中国进行的队列研究,以评估双棒式避孕植入剂在产品使用第三年、第四年和第五年的有效性、安全性和可接受性。

Cohort study to evaluate efficacy, safety and acceptability of a two-rod contraceptive implant during third, fourth and fifth year of product use in China.

作者信息

Che Y, Taylor D, Luo D, Maldonado L Y, Wang M, Wevill S, Vahdat H, Han X, Halpern V, Dorflinger L, Steiner M J

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Reproduction Regulation of NPFPC (SIPPR, IRD, Fudan University), Shanghai 200032, China.

Contraceptive Technology Innovation Division, FHI 360, 359 Blackwell Street, Durham, NC 27701, USA.

出版信息

Contracept X. 2019;1:100008. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2019.100008.

DOI:10.1016/j.conx.2019.100008
PMID:32494773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7252427/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Sino-implant (II) is a contraceptive implant approved for 4 years of use in China. We evaluated the contraceptive efficacy during the third, fourth and fifth year, and assessed additional pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and acceptability endpoints.

STUDY DESIGN

We enrolled a cohort of 255 current Sino-Implant (II) users entering their third year and a second cohort of 243 users entering their fourth year. We followed these two cohorts for 12 and 24 months, respectively. To characterize PK endpoints (i.e. levonorgestrel (LNG), sex hormone binding globulin and free LNG index) over 5 years, we collected blood samples in a subset of 50 participants we followed during the third, fourth and fifth year. We also enrolled small cohorts (n = 20) of Sino-implant (II) users entering their sixth month and second year and followed them each for up to 6 months. Our primary efficacy measures were the pregnancy Pearl Indices during Year 3 and 4. Secondary objectives included assessments of PK, safety, acceptability and efficacy in the fifth year.

RESULTS

We recorded four pregnancies, with a higher pregnancy rate during Year 3 [1.34 (95% CI: 0.28-3.93)] than Year 4 [0.44 (95% CI: 0.01-2.47)] or Year 5 [0.00 (95% CI: 0.00-2.02)]. The overall pregnancy rate for the third, fourth and fifth years of product use was 0.63 per 100 WY; 95% CI: (0.17-1.62). Mean LNG concentrations remained well above 200 pg/mL (Year 3 = 280.9; Year 4 = 233.6; Year 5 = 270.6). Most participants (93.7%) described their bleeding pattern as acceptable.

CONCLUSION

Sino-implant (II) is a highly effective contraceptive method in this population of Chinese women over 5 years.

IMPLICATIONS

Sino-implant (II) is a highly effective contraceptive method with an estimated Pearl Index of less than 1% over the third, fourth and fifth years of use in a population of Chinese women of reproductive age.

摘要

目的

欣妈富隆(II)是一种在中国获批可使用4年的避孕植入剂。我们评估了其在第三、第四和第五年的避孕效果,并评估了其他药代动力学(PK)、安全性和可接受性终点。

研究设计

我们招募了一组255名进入使用第三年的欣妈富隆(II)使用者和另一组243名进入使用第四年的使用者。我们分别对这两组人群进行了12个月和24个月的随访。为了描述5年内的PK终点(即左炔诺孕酮(LNG)、性激素结合球蛋白和游离LNG指数),我们在第三、第四和第五年随访的50名参与者子集中采集了血样。我们还招募了小队列(n = 20)进入使用第六个月和第二年的欣妈富隆(II)使用者,并分别对他们进行了长达6个月的随访。我们的主要疗效指标是第3年和第4年的妊娠珍珠指数。次要目标包括评估第5年的PK、安全性、可接受性和疗效。

结果

我们记录到4例妊娠,第3年的妊娠率[1.34(95%CI:0.28 - 3.93)]高于第4年[0.44(95%CI:0.01 - 2.47)]或第5年[0.00(95%CI:0.00 - 2.02)]。产品使用第三、第四和第五年的总体妊娠率为每100妇女年0.63;95%CI:(0.17 - 1.62)。平均LNG浓度仍远高于200 pg/mL(第3年 = 280.9;第4年 = 233.6;第5年 = 270.6)。大多数参与者(93.7%)表示其出血模式可接受。

结论

欣妈富隆(II)在这群中国女性中5年内是一种高效的避孕方法。

意义

欣妈富隆(II)是一种高效的避孕方法,在育龄中国女性人群中使用的第三、第四和第五年,估计珍珠指数小于1%。

相似文献

1
Cohort study to evaluate efficacy, safety and acceptability of a two-rod contraceptive implant during third, fourth and fifth year of product use in China.在中国进行的队列研究,以评估双棒式避孕植入剂在产品使用第三年、第四年和第五年的有效性、安全性和可接受性。
Contracept X. 2019;1:100008. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2019.100008.
2
Randomized trial to evaluate contraceptive efficacy, safety and acceptability of a two-rod contraceptive implant over 4 years in the Dominican Republic.在多米尼加共和国进行的一项随机试验,以评估双棒避孕植入剂4年的避孕效果、安全性和可接受性。
Contracept X. 2019;1:100006. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2019.100006.
3
Extended use up to 5 years of the etonogestrel-releasing subdermal contraceptive implant: comparison to levonorgestrel-releasing subdermal implant.依托孕烯释放皮下避孕植入剂长达5年的延长使用:与左炔诺孕酮释放皮下植入剂的比较。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Nov;31(11):2491-2498. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew222. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
4
Contraception with two levonorgestrel rod implants. A 5-year study in the United States and Dominican Republic.使用两根左炔诺孕酮植入棒避孕。在美国和多米尼加共和国进行的一项为期5年的研究。
Contraception. 1998 Nov;58(5):275-82. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00112-7.
5
Effectiveness of Norplant implants among Thai women in Bangkok.诺普兰皮下埋植剂在曼谷泰国女性中的有效性。
Contraception. 1996 Jan;53(1):33-6. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00261-8.
6
Levonorgestrel release rates measured through analysis of two-rod contraceptive explants.通过对双棒式避孕药具外植体的分析测得的左炔诺孕酮释放率。
Contracept X. 2020 Aug 21;2:100039. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100039. eCollection 2020.
7
Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of Sino-implant (II) during the first year of use: results from Kenya and Pakistan.中国产植入体(II型)使用第一年的有效性、安全性及可接受性:来自肯尼亚和巴基斯坦的结果。
Contraception. 2014 Mar;89(3):197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
8
A 3-year multicentre randomized controlled trial of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants, with non-randomized matched copper-intrauterine device controls.一项为期3年的多中心随机对照试验,比较依托孕烯和左炔诺孕酮释放型避孕植入剂,并设有非随机匹配的铜宫内节育器对照组。
Hum Reprod. 2015 Nov;30(11):2527-38. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev221. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
9
Pearl Index study with levonorgestrel-releasing intravaginal rings: using pharmacokinetic results to investigate treatment compliance as a potential contributor for contraceptive failure.左炔诺孕酮阴道环的 Pearl 指数研究:利用药代动力学结果探究治疗依从性对避孕失败的潜在影响。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Nov 1;35(11):2515-2523. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa195.
10
In vivo release of levonorgestrel from Sino-implant (II) — an innovative comparison of explant data.左炔诺孕酮从皮下埋植剂(II型)的体内释放——外植体数据的创新性比较
Contraception. 2015 Oct;92(4):350-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.028. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Can a 3 months treatment with oral Desogestrel prior to insertion of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant improve continuation rate at 1 year? A randomized trial.口服去氧孕烯三个月预处理能否提高依托孕烯植入 1 年后的续用率?一项随机试验。
BMC Res Notes. 2023 Mar 13;16(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06304-3.
2
Radical surgery for pseudo-ovarian malignancy: a case report of bowel endometriosis with massive ascites.假性卵巢恶性肿瘤的根治性手术:一例伴有大量腹水的肠道子宫内膜异位症病例报告
Gland Surg. 2022 May;11(5):932-937. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-895.
3
Levonorgestrel release rates measured through analysis of two-rod contraceptive explants.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized trial to evaluate contraceptive efficacy, safety and acceptability of a two-rod contraceptive implant over 4 years in the Dominican Republic.在多米尼加共和国进行的一项随机试验,以评估双棒避孕植入剂4年的避孕效果、安全性和可接受性。
Contracept X. 2019;1:100006. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2019.100006.
2
Liftoff: The Blossoming of Contraceptive Implant Use in Africa.启动:非洲避孕植入物使用的蓬勃发展。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018 Mar 30;6(1):17-39. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00396. Print 2018 Mar 21.
3
Extended use up to 5 years of the etonogestrel-releasing subdermal contraceptive implant: comparison to levonorgestrel-releasing subdermal implant.
通过对双棒式避孕药具外植体的分析测得的左炔诺孕酮释放率。
Contracept X. 2020 Aug 21;2:100039. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100039. eCollection 2020.
4
Randomized trial to evaluate contraceptive efficacy, safety and acceptability of a two-rod contraceptive implant over 4 years in the Dominican Republic.在多米尼加共和国进行的一项随机试验,以评估双棒避孕植入剂4年的避孕效果、安全性和可接受性。
Contracept X. 2019;1:100006. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2019.100006.
依托孕烯释放皮下避孕植入剂长达5年的延长使用:与左炔诺孕酮释放皮下植入剂的比较。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Nov;31(11):2491-2498. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew222. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
4
Implant removal experience with Sino-implant (II) at four Chinese sites.在中国四个地点使用欣可植入体(II型)的取出植入体经验。
Contraception. 2014 Sep;90(3):249-52. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 May 20.
5
Sino-implant (II)--a levonorgestrel-releasing two-rod implant: systematic review of the randomized controlled trials.Sino-implant(II)——一种左炔诺孕酮释放的双棒植入物:随机对照试验的系统评价。
Contraception. 2010 Mar;81(3):197-201. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.10.013. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
6
Levonorgestrel implants enhanced the suppression of spermatogenesis by testosterone implants: comparison between Chinese and non-Chinese men.左炔诺孕酮植入剂增强了睾酮植入剂对精子发生的抑制作用:中国男性与非中国男性的比较。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Feb;91(2):460-70. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-1743. Epub 2005 Nov 8.
7
Levonorgestrel concentrations during 7 years of continuous use of Jadelle contraceptive implants.在连续使用 Jadelle 避孕植入剂 7 年期间的左炔诺孕酮浓度。
Contraception. 2001 Jul;64(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00226-8.
8
The performance of levonorgestrel rod and Norplant contraceptive implants: a 5 year randomized study.左炔诺孕酮棒和皮下埋植避孕剂的性能:一项5年随机研究。
Hum Reprod. 1998 Dec;13(12):3371-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3371.
9
Contraception with two levonorgestrel rod implants. A 5-year study in the United States and Dominican Republic.使用两根左炔诺孕酮植入棒避孕。在美国和多米尼加共和国进行的一项为期5年的研究。
Contraception. 1998 Nov;58(5):275-82. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00112-7.
10
Sex hormone binding globulin and free levonorgestrel index in the first week after insertion of Norplant implants.皮下埋植左炔诺孕酮后第一周的性激素结合球蛋白与游离左炔诺孕酮指数
Contraception. 1998 Oct;58(4):211-4. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00102-4.