Mvundura Mercy, Di Giorgio Laura, Morozoff Chloe, Cover Jane, Ndour Marguerite, Drake Jennifer Kidwell
PATH, PO Box 900922, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
PATH, BP 15115, Dakar-Fann, Dakar, Senegal.
Contracept X. 2019;1:100012. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2019.100012.
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of self-injected subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) compared to health-worker-administered intramuscular DMPA (DMPA-IM) in Senegal and to assess how including practice or demonstration injections in client self-injection training affects estimates.
We developed a decision-tree model with a 12-month time horizon for a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 injectable contraceptive users in Senegal. We used the model to estimate incremental costs per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted. The analysis derived model inputs from DMPA-SC self-injection continuation and costing research studies and peer-reviewed literature. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness from societal and health system perspectives and conducted one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of results.
Compared to health-worker-administered DMPA-IM, self-injected DMPA-SC could prevent 1402 additional unintended pregnancies and avert 204 maternal DALYs per year for this hypothetical cohort. From a societal perspective, self-injection costs less than health worker administration regardless of the training approach and is therefore dominant. From the health system perspective, self-injection is dominant compared to health worker administration if a one-page instruction sheet is used and one additional DMPA-SC unit is used for training and is cost-effective at $208 per DALY averted when two additional DMPA-SC units are used. Sensitivity analysis showed estimates were robust.
Self-injected DMPA-SC averted more pregnancies and DALYs and cost less from the societal perspective compared to health-worker-administered DMPA-IM and hence is dominant. Using fewer DMPA-SC units for practice or demonstration improves cost-effectiveness of self-injection from the health system perspective.
Evidence from Senegal shows that self-injection of DMPA-SC can be dominant or cost-effective from both health system and societal perspectives relative to DMPA-IM from health workers even if women practice injecting or health workers demonstrate with one or two DMPA-SC units. Evidence on whether practice or demonstration is required for client training would be useful.
评估在塞内加尔自我注射皮下醋酸甲羟孕酮长效避孕针(DMPA-SC)与由卫生工作者进行肌内注射醋酸甲羟孕酮长效避孕针(DMPA-IM)相比的成本效益,并评估在客户自我注射培训中纳入练习或示范注射如何影响评估结果。
我们为塞内加尔100,000名使用注射用避孕药具的假设队列开发了一个为期12个月的决策树模型。我们使用该模型来估计每避免一个伤残调整生命年(DALY)的增量成本。分析从DMPA-SC自我注射持续率和成本研究以及同行评审文献中得出模型输入数据。我们从社会和卫生系统角度评估了成本效益,并进行了单向和概率敏感性分析以检验结果的稳健性。
对于这个假设队列,与由卫生工作者进行DMPA-IM注射相比,自我注射DMPA-SC每年可额外预防1402例意外怀孕,并避免204个孕产妇DALY。从社会角度来看,无论采用何种培训方法,自我注射的成本都低于由卫生工作者进行注射,因此具有主导性。从卫生系统角度来看,如果使用一页式说明书且额外使用一个DMPA-SC单位进行培训,自我注射相对于由卫生工作者进行注射具有主导性;当额外使用两个DMPA-SC单位时,每避免一个DALY的成本效益为208美元。敏感性分析表明评估结果是稳健的。
与由卫生工作者进行DMPA-IM注射相比,自我注射DMPA-SC可避免更多怀孕和DALY,且从社会角度来看成本更低,因此具有主导性。从卫生系统角度来看,减少用于练习或示范的DMPA-SC单位数量可提高自我注射的成本效益。
塞内加尔的证据表明,即使女性进行注射练习或卫生工作者用一两个DMPA-SC单位进行示范,相对于卫生工作者进行的DMPA-IM注射,自我注射DMPA-SC从卫生系统和社会角度来看都可能具有主导性或成本效益。关于客户培训是否需要练习或示范的证据将很有用。