• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating the reliability of gestalt quality ratings of medical education podcasts: A METRIQ study.评估医学教育播客整体质量评分的可靠性:一项 METRIQ 研究。
Perspect Med Educ. 2020 Oct;9(5):302-306. doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00589-x.
2
Individual Gestalt Is Unreliable for the Evaluation of Quality in Medical Education Blogs: A METRIQ Study.个体格式塔对于医学教育博客质量评估不可靠:一项METRIQ研究
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;70(3):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.12.025. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
3
Quality Evaluation Scores are no more Reliable than Gestalt in Evaluating the Quality of Emergency Medicine Blogs: A METRIQ Study.质量评估分数在评估急诊医学博客质量方面并不比整体印象更可靠:一项METRIQ研究。
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Jul-Sep;30(3):294-302. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1414609. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
4
Derivation of Two Critical Appraisal Scores for Trainees to Evaluate Online Educational Resources: A METRIQ Study.为学员推导两个用于评估在线教育资源的批判性评价分数:一项METRIQ研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;17(5):574-84. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.6.30825. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
5
An international, interprofessional investigation of the self-reported podcast listening habits of emergency clinicians: A METRIQ Study.一项国际跨专业调查:急诊临床医生自我报告的播客收听习惯:一项 METRIQ 研究。
CJEM. 2020 Jan;22(1):112-117. doi: 10.1017/cem.2019.427.
6
Educating medical residents through podcasts developed by PharmD students.通过药学博士学生制作的播客对住院医师进行教育。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Jul;9(4):683-688. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 May 31.
7
Podcast-Based Learning in Otolaryngology: Availability, Breadth, and Comparison with Other Specialties.耳鼻喉科的播客学习:可用性、广度及与其他专业的比较。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):E2131-E2138. doi: 10.1002/lary.29349. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
8
ALiEM Blog and Podcast Watch: Toxicology.《急诊医学住院医师高效学习指南》博客与播客观察:毒理学
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;18(6):1114-1119. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.6.33952. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
9
Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Blogs and Podcasts: Establishing an International Consensus on Quality.急诊医学与重症监护博客及播客:建立质量方面的国际共识。
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;66(4):396-402.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
10
Five Medical Education Podcasts You Need to Know.五个你必须知道的医学教育播客
Yale J Biol Med. 2020 Aug 31;93(3):461-466. eCollection 2020 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Podcast-Based Medical Education and Content Alignment with National Education Bodies.基于播客的医学教育以及与国家教育机构的内容对接。
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Jan 22;34(2):349-355. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01971-0. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
SAEM systematic online academic resource (SOAR) review: Gastrointestinal illnesses.SAEM系统在线学术资源(SOAR)综述:胃肠道疾病
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Mar 22;8(2):e10954. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10954. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Evaluating Effectiveness of YouTube Videos for Teaching Medical Students CPR: Solution to Optimizing Clinician Educator Workload during the COVID-19 Pandemic.评估 YouTube 视频在教授医学生心肺复苏术方面的有效性:在 COVID-19 大流行期间优化临床医生教育者工作量的解决方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 2;18(13):7113. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137113.

评估医学教育播客整体质量评分的可靠性:一项 METRIQ 研究。

Evaluating the reliability of gestalt quality ratings of medical education podcasts: A METRIQ study.

机构信息

Section of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2020 Oct;9(5):302-306. doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00589-x.

DOI:10.1007/s40037-020-00589-x
PMID:32495235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7550476/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Podcasts are increasingly being used for medical education. Studies have found that the assessment of the quality of online resources can be challenging. We sought to determine the reliability of gestalt quality assessment of education podcasts in emergency medicine.

METHODS

An international, interprofessional sample of raters was recruited through social media, direct contact, and the extended personal network of the study team. Each participant listened to eight podcasts (selected to include a variety of accents, number of speakers, and topics) and rated the quality of that podcast on a seven-point Likert scale. Phi coefficients were calculated within each group and overall. Decision studies were conducted using a phi of 0.8.

RESULTS

A total of 240 collaborators completed all eight surveys and were included in the analysis. Attendings, medical students, and physician assistants had the lowest individual-level variance and thus the lowest number of required raters to reliably evaluate quality (phi >0.80). Overall, 20 raters were required to reliably evaluate the quality of emergency medicine podcasts.

DISCUSSION

Gestalt ratings of quality from approximately 20 health professionals are required to reliably assess the quality of a podcast. This finding should inform future work focused on developing and validating tools to support the evaluation of quality in these resources.

摘要

简介

播客越来越多地被用于医学教育。研究发现,评估在线资源的质量具有挑战性。我们旨在确定急诊医学教育播客整体质量评估的可靠性。

方法

通过社交媒体、直接联系和研究团队的扩展个人网络,招募了国际跨专业的评估者样本。每位参与者收听了 8 个播客(选择包括各种口音、演讲者人数和主题),并对该播客的质量进行了 7 分李克特量表评分。在每个组和总体内计算了 phi 系数。使用 phi 值为 0.8 进行决策研究。

结果

共有 240 名合作者完成了所有八项调查并纳入分析。主治医生、医学生和医师助理的个体差异最小,因此可靠评估质量所需的评估者人数最少(phi >0.80)。总体而言,需要 20 名评估者来可靠评估急诊医学播客的质量。

讨论

需要大约 20 名卫生专业人员的整体质量评分才能可靠评估播客的质量。这一发现应该为未来专注于开发和验证工具以支持这些资源质量评估的工作提供信息。