Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Research Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Exp Physiol. 2021 Jan;106(1):269-281. doi: 10.1113/EP088637. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
What is the central question of this study? Does passive heat acclimation alter glomerular filtration rate and urine-concentrating ability in response to passive heat stress? What is the main finding and its importance? Glomerular filtration rate remained unchanged after passive heat stress, and heat acclimation did not alter this response. However, heat acclimation mitigated the reduction in urine-concentrating ability and reduced the incidence of albuminuria in young healthy adults after passive heat stress. Collectively, these results suggest that passive heat acclimation might improve structural integrity and reduce glomerular permeability during passive heat stress.
Little is known about the effect of heat acclimation on kidney function during heat stress. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of passive heat stress and subsequent passive heat acclimation on markers of kidney function. Twelve healthy adults (seven men and five women; 26 ± 5 years of age; 72.7 ± 8.6 kg; 172.4 ± 7.5 cm) underwent passive heat stress before and after a 7 day controlled hyperthermia heat acclimation protocol. The impact of passive heat exposure on urine and serum markers of kidney function was evaluated before and after heat acclimation. Glomerular filtration rate, determined from creatinine clearance, was unchanged with passive heat stress before (pre, 133 ± 41 ml min ; post, 127 ± 51 ml min ; P = 0.99) and after (pre, 129 ± 46 ml min ; post, 130 ± 36 ml min ; P = 0.99) heat acclimation. The urine-to-serum osmolality ratio was reduced after passive heating (P < 0.01), but heat acclimation did not alter this response. In comparison to baseline, free water clearance was greater after passive heating before (pre, -0.86 ± 0.67 ml min ; post, 0.40 ± 1.01 ml min ; P < 0.01) but not after (pre, -0.16 ± 0.57 ml min ; post, 0.76 ± 1.2 ml min ; P = 0.11) heat acclimation. Furthermore, passive heating increased the fractional excretion rate of potassium (P < 0.03) but not sodium (P = 0.13) or chloride (P = 0.20). Lastly, heat acclimation reduced the fractional incidence of albuminuria after passive heating (before, 58 ± 51%; after, 8 ± 29%; P = 0.03). Collectively, these results demonstrate that passive heat stress does not alter the glomerular filtration rate. However, heat acclimation might improve urine-concentrating ability and filtration within the glomerulus.
这项研究的核心问题是什么?被动热适应是否会改变肾小球滤过率和尿液浓缩能力以应对被动热应激?主要发现及其重要性是什么?在被动热应激后,肾小球滤过率保持不变,热适应并没有改变这种反应。然而,热适应减轻了年轻健康成年人在被动热应激后尿液浓缩能力的降低,并减少了白蛋白尿的发生。总的来说,这些结果表明,被动热适应可能在被动热应激期间改善结构完整性并降低肾小球通透性。
关于热适应对热应激期间肾功能的影响知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定被动热应激和随后的被动热适应对肾功能标志物的影响。12 名健康成年人(7 名男性和 5 名女性;26±5 岁;72.7±8.6kg;172.4±7.5cm)在 7 天的受控高温热适应方案之前和之后接受被动热应激。在热适应之前和之后,评估了被动热暴露对尿液和血清肾功能标志物的影响。肾小球滤过率通过肌酐清除率确定,在被动热应激前(前,133±41ml·min-1;后,127±51ml·min-1;P=0.99)和后(前,129±46ml·min-1;后,130±36ml·min-1;P=0.99)均无变化。尿与血清渗透压比值在被动加热后降低(P<0.01),但热适应并未改变这种反应。与基线相比,在被动加热前(前,-0.86±0.67ml·min-1;后,0.40±1.01ml·min-1;P<0.01)而不是在热适应后(前,-0.16±0.57ml·min-1;后,0.76±1.2ml·min-1;P=0.11),自由水清除率更大。此外,被动加热增加了钾的分数排泄率(P<0.03),但不增加钠(P=0.13)或氯(P=0.20)的分数排泄率。最后,热适应降低了被动加热后白蛋白尿的分数发生率(前,58±51%;后,8±29%;P=0.03)。总的来说,这些结果表明,被动热应激不会改变肾小球滤过率。然而,热适应可能会改善肾小球内的尿液浓缩能力和过滤。