Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Aabama.
Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Aabama.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2022 Jan;45(1):91-99. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1769949. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
: Compare the gut microbiome composition among individuals with acute spinal cord injury (A-SCI), long-standing SCI (L-SCI), vs. able-bodied (AB) controls.: Cross-sectional study.: The University of Alabama at Birmingham.: Seven adults with A-SCI (36 ± 12 years, 2F/5M, C4-T10, and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale [AIS] A-D), 25 with L-SCI (46 ± 13 years, 6F/19M, C4-L1, and AIS A-D), and 25 AB controls (42 ± 13 years, 9F/16M).: Stool samples were collected after a median of 7 days and 18 years after injury in the A-SCI and L-SCI groups, respectively. Gut microbiome composition was analyzed using the 16S rRNA sequencing technique and QIIME software. The abundances of bacteria communities among groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test adjusted for age.: Several alpha diversity indices were different among groups (Chao1, Observed species, and Phylogenetic Diversity), but not others (Shannon and Simpson). Beta diversity differed among each pair of groups ( < 0.05). A number of microbial communities were differentially abundant among the groups ( < 0.05).: Our results revealed differences in the gut microbiome composition among groups. Compared to the AB controls, the SCI groups demonstrated microbiome profiles that shared features linked to metabolic syndrome, inflammation-related bowel disorders, depressive disorders, or antibiotics use, whereas the L-SCI group's microbiome included features linked to reduced physical activity compared to the A-SCI and AB controls. Our results provided preliminary data and a scientific foundation for future studies investigating the impact of the gut microbiome composition on long-term health in individuals with SCI.
比较急性脊髓损伤(A-SCI)、长期脊髓损伤(L-SCI)和健康对照组(AB)个体的肠道微生物组组成。
横断面研究。
阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校。
7 名急性脊髓损伤患者(36±12 岁,2 女/5 男,C4-T10,美国脊髓损伤协会损伤分级 [AIS] A-D),25 名长期脊髓损伤患者(46±13 岁,6 女/19 男,C4-L1,AIS A-D)和 25 名健康对照组(42±13 岁,9 女/16 男)。
在 A-SCI 和 L-SCI 组分别于损伤后中位数 7 天和 18 年采集粪便样本。使用 16S rRNA 测序技术和 QIIME 软件分析肠道微生物组组成。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较各组之间细菌群落的丰度,并对年龄进行调整。
各组之间存在一些 alpha 多样性指数差异(Chao1、Observed species 和 Phylogenetic Diversity),但其他指数(Shannon 和 Simpson)没有差异。每组之间的 beta 多样性不同( < 0.05)。许多微生物群落在组间存在差异( < 0.05)。
我们的结果显示了各组之间肠道微生物组组成的差异。与 AB 对照组相比,SCI 组的微生物组图谱具有与代谢综合征、炎症相关的肠道疾病、抑郁障碍或抗生素使用相关的特征,而与 A-SCI 和 AB 对照组相比,L-SCI 组的微生物组图谱具有与身体活动减少相关的特征。我们的结果为未来研究提供了初步数据和科学基础,以调查肠道微生物组组成对 SCI 患者长期健康的影响。