• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估登革热临床流行病学标准在巴西流行地区居民中的诊断有效性。

Evaluating the validity of dengue clinical-epidemiological criteria for diagnosis in patients residing in a Brazilian endemic area.

机构信息

Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, Av. Brg. Faria Lima, 5416 - Vila Sao Pedro, São José do Rio Preto - São Paulo, CEP 15090-000, Brazil.

Faculdade de Medicina, União das Faculdades dos Grandes Lagos, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15030-070, Brazil.

出版信息

Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Aug 1;114(8):603-611. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/traa031.

DOI:10.1093/trstmh/traa031
PMID:32497201
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the validity of clinical diagnosis compared with laboratory diagnosis of dengue in a retrospective sample of patients in São José do Rio Preto, Brazil.

METHODS

Our sample included 148 299 clinically (56.3%) or laboratory-diagnosed (43.7%) dengue cases. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of dengue patients' demographic and clinical characteristics with laboratory-based diagnosis. We used logistic regressions to estimate the correlation between clinical and laboratory diagnosis of dengue and a full set of dengue signs and symptoms.

RESULTS

We found substantial variability in sensitivity and specificity of signs and symptoms ranging from 0.8-81.1 and 21.5-99.6, respectively. Thrombocytopenia exhibited the highest PPV (92.0) and lowest NPV (42.2) and was the only symptom showing agreement with laboratory-confirmed dengue (φ = 0.38). The presence of exanthema and thrombocytopenia led to a greater likelihood of concordant clinical and laboratory diagnoses (exanthema: OR: 4.23; 95% CI: 2.09 to 8.57; thrombocytopenia: OR: 4.02; 95% CI: 1.32 to 12.27).

CONCLUSIONS

We found substantial variation in sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of dengue signs and symptoms. For accuracy, clinical and laboratory diagnosis of dengue should be performed concurrently. When laboratory tests are not available, we suggest focusing on the clinical manifestations most associated with dengue.

摘要

背景

我们评估了巴西圣若泽杜里奥普雷托回顾性样本中临床诊断与实验室诊断登革热的有效性。

方法

我们的样本包括 148299 例临床(56.3%)或实验室诊断(43.7%)的登革热病例。我们比较了登革热患者的人口统计学和临床特征与基于实验室的诊断的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值(PPV 和 NPV)。我们使用逻辑回归估计临床和实验室诊断登革热与全套登革热体征和症状之间的相关性。

结果

我们发现体征和症状的敏感性和特异性存在很大差异,范围分别为 0.8-81.1 和 21.5-99.6。血小板减少症的 PPV 最高(92.0),NPV 最低(42.2),是唯一与实验室确诊登革热一致的症状(φ=0.38)。皮疹和血小板减少症的存在更有可能导致临床和实验室诊断一致(皮疹:OR:4.23;95%CI:2.09 至 8.57;血小板减少症:OR:4.02;95%CI:1.32 至 12.27)。

结论

我们发现登革热体征和症状的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 存在很大差异。为了准确性,应同时进行临床和实验室诊断登革热。当无法进行实验室检测时,我们建议重点关注与登革热最相关的临床表现。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the validity of dengue clinical-epidemiological criteria for diagnosis in patients residing in a Brazilian endemic area.评估登革热临床流行病学标准在巴西流行地区居民中的诊断有效性。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Aug 1;114(8):603-611. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/traa031.
2
Clinical features and dynamic ordinary laboratory tests differentiating dengue fever from other febrile illnesses in children.儿童登革热与其他发热性疾病的临床特征和普通实验室动态检测差异。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2018 Oct;51(5):614-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2016.08.018. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
3
High prevalence of clinically unsuspected dengue disease among children in Ribeirao Preto city, Brazil.巴西里贝朗普雷图市儿童中临床未确诊登革热的高发率。
J Med Virol. 2016 Oct;88(10):1711-9. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24533. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
4
Evaluation of laboratory tests for dengue diagnosis in clinical specimens from consecutive patients with suspected dengue in Belo Horizonte, Brazil.对巴西贝洛奥里藏特连续疑似登革热患者临床标本进行登革热诊断的实验室检测评估。
J Clin Virol. 2013 Sep;58(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2013.06.015. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
5
Clinical and laboratory signs as dengue markers during an outbreak in Rio de Janeiro.里约热内卢疫情期间作为登革热标志物的临床和实验室指标
Infection. 2008 Dec;36(6):570-4. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-7334-6. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
6
Accuracy of clinical criteria and an immunochromatographic strip test for dengue diagnosis in a DENV-4 epidemic.登革4型病毒流行期间临床标准及免疫层析试纸条检测对登革热诊断的准确性
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jan 29;16:37. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1368-7.
7
[Laboratory diagnosis and symptoms of dengue, during an outbreak in the Ribeirão Preto region, SP, Brazil].[巴西圣保罗州里贝朗普雷图地区登革热疫情期间的实验室诊断与症状]
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1992 Mar-Apr;34(2):121-30.
8
Assessment of the relationship between entomologic indicators of Aedes aegypti and the epidemic occurrence of dengue virus 3 in a susceptible population, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.评估易感人群中埃及伊蚊的昆虫学指标与登革热病毒 3 流行发生之间的关系,巴西圣保罗州圣若泽-杜里奥普雷图。
Acta Trop. 2015 Feb;142:167-77. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.11.017. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
9
Co-infection between Zika and different Dengue serotypes during DENV outbreak in Brazil.巴西登革热疫情期间寨卡病毒与不同血清型登革热病毒的合并感染。
J Infect Public Health. 2019 Mar-Apr;12(2):178-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
10
Yellow fever (YF) vaccination does not increase dengue severity: A retrospective study based on 11,448 dengue notifications in a YF and dengue endemic region.黄热病(YF)疫苗接种不会加重登革热的严重程度:基于 YF 和登革热流行地区 11448 例登革热报告的回顾性研究。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2019 Jul-Aug;30:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A machine learning model to assess potential misdiagnosed dengue hospitalization.一种用于评估登革热住院潜在误诊情况的机器学习模型。
Heliyon. 2023 May 30;9(6):e16634. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16634. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
A spatio-temporal analysis of dengue spread in a Brazilian dry climate region.巴西干旱气候地区登革热传播的时空分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 4;11(1):11892. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91306-z.