Suppr超能文献

致癌物前体苯并[a]芘对人淋巴母细胞系MCL-5的被动给药暴露与溶剂加标暴露的比较。

Comparison of passive-dosed and solvent spiked exposures of pro-carcinogen, benzo[a]pyrene, to human lymphoblastoid cell line, MCL-5.

作者信息

Chapman Fiona M, Sparham Chris, Hastie Colin, Sanders David J, van Egmond Roger, Chapman Katherine E, Doak Shareen H, Scott Andrew D, Jenkins Gareth J S

机构信息

In Vitro Toxicology Group, Institute of Life Science 1, Swansea University Medical School, Singleton Campus, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.

Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever, Colworth House, Sharnbrook, Bedford MK44 1LQ, UK.

出版信息

Toxicol In Vitro. 2020 Sep;67:104905. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104905. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

Abstract

Genotoxicity testing methods in vitro provide a means to predict the DNA damaging effects of chemicals on human cells. This is hindered in the case of hydrophobic test compounds, however, which will partition to in vitro components such as plastic-ware and medium proteins, in preference to the aqueous phase of the exposure medium. This affects the freely available test chemical concentration, and as this freely dissolved aqueous concentration is that bioavailable to cells, it is important to define and maintain this exposure. Passive dosing promises to have an advantage over traditional 'solvent spiking' exposure methods and involves the establishment and maintenance of known chemical concentrations in the in vitro medium, and therefore aqueous phase. Passive dosing was applied in a novel format to expose the MCL-5 human lymphoblastoid cell line to the pro-carcinogen, benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) and was compared to solvent (dimethyl sulphoxide) spiked B[a]P exposures over 48 h. Passive dosing induced greater changes, at lower concentrations, to micronucleus frequency, p21 mRNA expression, cell cycle abnormalities, and cell and nuclear morphology. This was attributed to a maintained, definable, free chemical concentration using passive dosing and the presence or absence of solvent, and highlights the influence of exposure choice on genotoxic outcomes.

摘要

体外遗传毒性测试方法提供了一种预测化学物质对人类细胞DNA损伤作用的手段。然而,对于疏水性测试化合物来说,情况并非如此,因为它们会优先分配到体外组件,如塑料制品和培养基蛋白中,而不是暴露介质的水相。这会影响可自由获得的测试化学物质浓度,由于这种自由溶解的水相浓度才是细胞可利用的生物可利用浓度,所以定义和维持这种暴露很重要。被动给药有望比传统的“溶剂加样”暴露方法具有优势,它涉及在体外培养基中,也就是水相中建立和维持已知的化学物质浓度。被动给药以一种新颖的方式应用于使MCL - 5人淋巴母细胞系暴露于致癌物苯并[a]芘(B[a]P),并与在48小时内用溶剂(二甲基亚砜)加样的B[a]P暴露进行比较。被动给药在较低浓度下对微核频率、p21 mRNA表达、细胞周期异常以及细胞和细胞核形态诱导了更大的变化。这归因于使用被动给药维持了可定义的游离化学物质浓度以及溶剂的存在与否,并突出了暴露选择对遗传毒性结果的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验