Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER of Pathophysiology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, UK.
Integrative Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Diseases, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center-INSERM U970 (PARCC), France.
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Aug;88:44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.074. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
Differentials in COVID-19 hospitalisations and mortality according to ethnicity have been reported but their origin is uncertain. We examined the role of socioeconomic, mental health, and pro-inflammatory factors in a community-based sample.
We used data on 340,966 men and women (mean age 56.2 years) from the UK Biobank study, a prospective cohort study with linkage to hospitalisation for COVID-19. Logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between ethnicity and hospitalisation for COVID-19.
There were 640 COVID-19 cases (571/324,306 White, 31/4,485 Black, 21/5,732 Asian, 17/5,803 Other). Compared to the White study members and after adjusting for age and sex, Black individuals had over a 4-fold increased risk of COVID-19 infection (odds ratio; 95% confidence interval: 4.32; 3.00-6.23), and there was a doubling of risk in the Asian group (2.12; 1.37, 3.28) and the 'other' non-white group (1.84; 1.13, 2.99). After controlling for potential explanatory factors which included neighbourhood deprivation, household crowding, smoking, body size, inflammation, glycated haemoglobin, and mental illness, these effect estimates were attenuated by 33% for Blacks, 52% for Asians and 43% for Other, but remained raised for Blacks (2.66; 1.82, 3.91), Asian (1.43; 0.91, 2.26) and other non-white groups (1.41; 0.87, 2.31).
There were clear ethnic differences in risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation and these do not appear to be fully explained by measured factors. If replicated, our results have implications for health policy, including the targeting of prevention advice and vaccination coverage.
已报道根据种族报告的 COVID-19 住院和死亡率差异,但其来源尚不确定。我们在基于社区的样本中检查了社会经济、心理健康和促炎因素的作用。
我们使用了来自英国生物库研究的 340966 名男性和女性的数据(平均年龄 56.2 岁),这是一项具有 COVID-19 住院情况链接的前瞻性队列研究。使用逻辑回归模型来估计种族与 COVID-19 住院之间的关联。
共有 640 例 COVID-19 病例(324306 名白人中的 571 例、4485 名黑人中的 31 例、5732 名亚洲人中的 21 例、5803 名其他人种中的 17 例)。与白人研究成员相比,并且在调整了年龄和性别后,黑人个体感染 COVID-19 的风险高出 4 倍以上(优势比;95%置信区间:4.32;3.00-6.23),而亚洲人群的风险增加了一倍(2.12;1.37,3.28)和“其他”非白人组(1.84;1.13,2.99)。在控制了包括邻里贫困、家庭拥挤、吸烟、体型、炎症、糖化血红蛋白和精神疾病在内的潜在解释因素后,黑人的这些估计值降低了 33%,亚洲人的降低了 52%,“其他”非白人组降低了 43%,但黑人的风险仍然升高(2.66;1.82,3.91),亚洲人(1.43;0.91,2.26)和其他非白人组(1.41;0.87,2.31)。
COVID-19 住院风险存在明显的种族差异,这些差异似乎无法完全用已测量的因素来解释。如果得到复制,我们的结果对卫生政策具有影响,包括预防建议和疫苗接种覆盖率的针对性。