Voyten Jamie, Holtzman Matthew P, Pantanowitz Liron, Dhir Rajiv, Beasley H Scott, Cuda Jackie, Monaco Sara E
Clinical Research Services, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020 Sep-Oct;9(5):461-468. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 May 6.
Small biopsies and cytology specimens have become increasingly important for clinical trials and biomarker testing. Thus, institutions must ensure that adequate lesional material meeting the specifications for a multitude of different protocols is available. This can be achieved using rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). The aim of the present study was to determine the recent clinical trial biopsy characteristics and study the feedback on these collections at our institution.
Clinical trial biopsies performed at our institution and trial feedback (including "queries") were analyzed from the 2017 to 2019. The query data were reviewed in detail, in addition to any protocol modifications related to biopsy requirements and study protocol changes.
A total of 698 biopsy collections were performed for clinical trial purposes for 95 trials, with most requiring biopsies at >1 time point (63.2%), for phase I or II trials (92.6%), and for specific tumor types (67.4%). Only 18 of the trials (18.9%) requiring fresh tissue biopsies provided feedback. The feedback included data from 90 cases (12.9%), of which 27 (30.0%) had queries regarding insufficient (n = 10; 37.0%) or borderline (n = 17; 63.0%) tumor tissue. Only 1 (3.7%) of these had had ROSE by cytology. ROSE was performed in accordance with institutional guidelines (45.3%), as required by the study (1.1%), or because of trial modification (5.3%).
The present investigation has shown the high volume of clinical trial biopsies managed at our academic cancer center. Feedback from the trials was low at 18.9% and frequently involved suboptimal cases without ROSE used at acquisition. This has led to more widespread adoption of ROSE to mitigate insufficient biopsy specimens and repeat procedures. The high volume of clinical trial biopsies and variability in trial needs necessitates a collaborative multidisciplinary network, including cytology services, to facilitate these important biopsies for patients with cancer.
小活检和细胞学标本对于临床试验和生物标志物检测变得越来越重要。因此,机构必须确保有足够的病变材料符合多种不同方案的规格要求。这可以通过快速现场评估(ROSE)来实现。本研究的目的是确定近期临床试验活检的特征,并研究我们机构对这些样本采集的反馈。
分析了2017年至2019年在我们机构进行的临床试验活检以及试验反馈(包括“疑问”)。除了与活检要求相关的任何方案修改和研究方案变更外,还详细审查了疑问数据。
总共为95项试验进行了698次用于临床试验目的的活检采集,大多数试验需要在>1个时间点进行活检(63.2%),用于I期或II期试验(92.6%),以及特定肿瘤类型(67.4%)。仅18项(18.9%)需要新鲜组织活检的试验提供了反馈。反馈包括90例(12.9%)的数据,其中27例(30.0%)对肿瘤组织不足(n = 10;37.0%)或临界(n = 17;63.0%)存在疑问。这些病例中只有1例(3.7%)通过细胞学进行了ROSE。ROSE是按照机构指南进行的(45.3%),根据研究要求进行的(1.1%),或由于试验修改进行的(5.3%)。
本调查显示了我们学术癌症中心管理的大量临床试验活检。试验反馈率较低,为18.9%,且经常涉及采集时未使用ROSE的次优病例。这导致更广泛地采用ROSE来减少活检标本不足和重复操作。大量的临床试验活检以及试验需求的变异性需要一个协作的多学科网络,包括细胞学服务,以促进为癌症患者进行这些重要的活检。