Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
School of Nursing, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, Brazil.
Int J Older People Nurs. 2020 Sep;15(3):e12319. doi: 10.1111/opn.12319. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
To identify the current state of knowledge about the use of the sit-to-stand intervention with older people and to identify implications for further research.
Many older people experience mobility challenges which can negatively affect their well-being. Physical activities are vital to improving or maintaining mobility. Although there is evidence that mobility challenged older people benefit from the sit-to-stand intervention, there is a need to systematically examine the state of knowledge about this intervention.
Scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework.
A systematic search of three databases was completed. Abstracts were evaluated for relevance using predetermined inclusion criteria. Studies that met the inclusion criteria had data extracted and were appraised for internal and external validity. Narrative synthesis was based on methods described by Popay and colleagues.
Of 3,041 papers, six studies met the inclusion criteria. Publications provided a range of sit-to-stand interventions with durations varying from four weeks to six months. The frequency of each intervention fluctuated from three to seven times/week with a duration of 15-45 min. Different professionals prompted the activity. Three themes were identified the following: (a) sit-to-stand activity as an intervention; (b) generalisability of findings; and (c) sustainability.
Most of the studies reviewed indicated improvements in performance of the sit-to-stand activity and in motor function. However, issues with studies rigour do not allow us to make generalisations. Further research is needed to confirm the effectiveness of the intervention.
Healthcare providers are expected to offer evidence-based patient care. This review details current knowledge about the sit-to-stand intervention with older people.
确定目前关于使用坐站干预措施来帮助老年人的知识现状，并确定进一步研究的意义。
许多老年人都面临着行动挑战，这可能会对他们的幸福感产生负面影响。身体活动对于改善或维持行动能力至关重要。尽管有证据表明，行动能力受限的老年人可以从坐站干预中受益，但需要系统地检查有关该干预的知识现状。
使用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的方法学框架进行范围审查。
对三个数据库进行了系统搜索。使用预定的纳入标准评估摘要的相关性。符合纳入标准的研究提取数据，并对其内部和外部有效性进行评估。基于 Popay 等人描述的方法进行叙述性综合。
在 3041 篇论文中，有 6 篇研究符合纳入标准。出版物提供了一系列坐站干预措施，持续时间从四周到六个月不等。每次干预的频率从每周三次到七次不等，持续时间为 15-45 分钟。不同的专业人员提示进行活动。确定了以下三个主题：（a）坐站活动作为干预措施；（b）研究结果的普遍性；和（c）可持续性。
大多数审查的研究表明，坐站活动和运动功能的表现都有所改善。然而，由于研究严谨性的问题，我们无法进行概括。需要进一步的研究来确认该干预措施的有效性。
医疗保健提供者应该提供基于证据的患者护理。本综述详细介绍了目前关于老年人坐站干预的知识。
