Suppr超能文献

应用双能 X 射线吸收法对美国大学生体育协会一级足球和男子长曲棍球项目运动员身体成分的位置分析。

Positional Analysis of Body Composition Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Football and Men's Lacrosse.

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, Towson University, Towson, Maryland.

Towson Research Academy for Collaborative Sport Science (TRACS), Towson University, Towson, Maryland; and.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Jun 1;36(6):1699-1707. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003669. Epub 2020 Jun 4.

Abstract

Zabriskie, HA, Dobrosielski, DA, Leppert, KM, Droege, AJ, Knuth, ND, and Lisman, PJ. Positional analysis of body composition using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I football and men's lacrosse. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1699-1707, 2022-Despite the widespread use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), few studies have examined differences in body composition between positions within sports and none have reported DXA-derived body composition reference values for men's lacrosse. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in measures of total and regional body composition and bone mineral density (BMD) using DXA across sport positions in a large cohort of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I male lacrosse and football players. A total of 294 male athletes (football, n = 196; lacrosse, n = 98) underwent DXA. One-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to examine whether body composition variables differed by sports position. In football, position was a significant determinant for every compositional variable in football athletes (all, p < 0.05; effect size range = 0.24-0.79). Offensive linemen had the highest total body fat percentage (30.1 ± 2.9%), followed by fullbacks (26.7 ± 3.3%) and defensive linemen (24.6 ± 5.7%); wide receivers had the lowest (14.5 ± 2.1%). For total body BMD, defensive linemen had the highest (1.70 ± 0.09 g·cm-3), followed by linebackers (1.67 ± 0.09 g·cm-3) and offensive linemen (1.65 ± 0.09 g·cm-3); kickers had the lowest (1.45 ± 0.11 g·cm-3) BMD. In lacrosse, no differences were found between positions for any total or regional body composition and BMD measure (all, p > 0.05). Our data confirm that total and regional measures of body composition and BMD vary across positions in football but not in men's lacrosse. Unlike football, similarities in body composition among lacrosse players may indicate that the uniformity of training demands or preferred player attributes in team selection outweigh the unique positional demands in gameplay.

摘要

扎布里斯基,哈,多布罗西尔斯基,DA,勒珀特,KM,德罗格,AJ,努思,ND,和利isman,PJ。使用双能 X 射线吸收法对美国大学生体育协会一级足球和男子曲棍球中身体成分进行定位分析。J 力量与调理研究 36(6):1699-1707,2022-尽管双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)的应用广泛,但很少有研究在运动项目内比较不同位置之间的身体成分差异,也没有报告过男子曲棍球的 DXA 衍生的身体成分参考值。本研究的目的是在一个大型美国大学生体育协会一级男子曲棍球和足球运动员队列中,使用 DXA 检查运动位置对总身体成分和区域身体成分以及骨矿物质密度(BMD)的测量值的差异。共有 294 名男性运动员(足球,n = 196;曲棍球,n = 98)接受了 DXA。使用单向方差分析或 Kruskal-Wallis 检验来检查运动位置是否会影响身体成分变量。在足球中,位置是足球运动员所有成分变量的显著决定因素(均,p < 0.05;效应大小范围= 0.24-0.79)。进攻线球员的总体脂百分比最高(30.1 ± 2.9%),其次是后卫(26.7 ± 3.3%)和防守线球员(24.6 ± 5.7%);外接手最低(14.5 ± 2.1%)。对于总身体 BMD,防守线球员最高(1.70 ± 0.09 g·cm-3),其次是线卫(1.67 ± 0.09 g·cm-3)和进攻线球员(1.65 ± 0.09 g·cm-3);踢球手最低(1.45 ± 0.11 g·cm-3)。在曲棍球中,位置之间的任何总身体成分、区域身体成分和 BMD 测量值均无差异(均,p > 0.05)。我们的数据证实,在足球中,总身体成分和区域身体成分以及 BMD 的测量值因位置而异,但在男子曲棍球中则不然。与足球不同,曲棍球运动员之间身体成分的相似性可能表明,在团队选择中,训练要求或首选运动员属性的一致性超过了比赛中独特的位置要求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验