Dobrosielski Devon A, Leppert Kyle M, Knuth Nick D, Wilder Joshua N, Kovacs Louis, Lisman Peter J
Department of Kinesiology, Towson University, Towson, MD.
Towson Research Academy of Collaborative Sport Science (TRACS), Towson University, Towson, MD.
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Oct 1;35(10):2886-2893. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003213.
Dobrosielski, DA, Leppert, KM, Knuth, ND, Wilder, JN, Kovacs, L, and Lisman, PJ. Body composition values of NCAA Division 1 female athletes derived from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Strength Cond Res 35(10): 2886-2893, 2021-This study generated descriptive data for regional and total body composition and bone mineral density (BMD) measures using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) across 12 NCAA Division 1 female competitive sports. Two hundred seventy-eight female collegiate athletes underwent DXA: basketball (BB; n = 28), cross country (CC = 11), field hockey (FH; n = 35), gymnastics (GYM; n = 23), lacrosse (LAX; n = 48), soccer (SOC; CC = 27), softball (SB; n = 24), swimming and diving (SW; n = 35), tennis (TN; n = 11), track and field ([TR-throw; n = 10]; [TR-run; n = 10]), and volleyball (VB; n = 16). Descriptive statistics for all body composition and BMD measures were calculated. Group mean differences in all regional and total body composition (all, p < 0.001; η2 range = 0.177-0.365) and BMD (all, p < 0.001; η2 range = 0.317-0.383) measures were observed between teams. The total BF% for gymnasts (23.5%) was lower than TN, FH, LAX, SB, and TR-throw (mean difference range: -4.6 to -12.9%, all p < 0.01); TR-throw had the highest total BF% (36.4%). Cross country had lower total BMD (1.17 g·cm-2) than FH, TR-throw, LAX, GYM, SOC, SB, VB, and BB (mean difference range: -0.12 to -0.26 g·cm-2, all p < 0.01); BB and TR-throw had the highest total BMD (1.40 and 1.43 g·cm-2, respectively). Our data confirm that regional and total body composition and BMD measures varied across female collegiate sports. These findings may assist sports medicine and strength and conditioning practitioners with identifying sport-specific goal values for BF% and BMD to optimize program design.
多布罗谢尔斯基,DA,莱珀特,KM,克努特,ND,怀尔德,JN,科瓦奇,L,以及利兹曼,PJ。通过双能X线吸收法得出的美国大学体育协会第一分区女运动员的身体成分值。《力量与体能研究杂志》35(10): 2886 - 2893,2021年——本研究使用双能X线吸收法(DXA)针对12项美国大学体育协会第一分区女子竞技运动生成了区域和全身成分以及骨矿物质密度(BMD)测量的描述性数据。278名大学女运动员接受了DXA检测:篮球(BB;n = 28)、越野(CC = 11)、曲棍球(FH;n = 35)、体操(GYM;n = 23)、长曲棍球(LAX;n = 48)、足球(SOC;CC = 27)、垒球(SB;n = 24)、游泳和跳水(SW;n = 35)、网球(TN;n = 11)、田径([TR - 投掷;n = 10];[TR - 跑步;n = 10])以及排球(VB;n = 16)。计算了所有身体成分和BMD测量的描述性统计数据。观察到各队之间在所有区域和全身成分(所有,p < 0.001;η2范围 = 0.177 - 0.365)以及BMD(所有行为,p < 0.001;η2范围 = 0.317 - 0.383)测量方面存在组间均值差异。体操运动员的总体脂百分比(BF%)(23.5%)低于网球、曲棍球、长曲棍球、垒球和投掷项目的田径运动员(平均差异范围:-4.6至-12.9%,所有p < 0.01);投掷项目的田径运动员总BF%最高(36.4%)。越野项目的总BMD(1.17 g·cm - 2)低于曲棍球、投掷项目的田径运动员、长曲棍球、体操、足球、垒球、排球和篮球(平均差异范围:-0.12至-0.26 g·cm - 2,所有p < 0.01);篮球和投掷项目的田径运动员总BMD最高(分别为1.40和1.43 g·cm - 2)。我们的数据证实,区域和全身成分以及BMD测量在大学女子体育项目中各不相同。这些发现可能有助于运动医学以及力量与体能训练从业者确定特定运动的BF%和BMD目标值,以优化项目设计。