Suppr超能文献

女运动员三联征联盟累积风险评估工具:提议的替代评分策略

Female Athlete Triad Coalition cumulative risk assessment tool: proposed alternative scoring strategies.

作者信息

Koltun Kristen J, Williams Nancy I, De Souza Mary Jane

机构信息

Women's Health and Exercise Lab, Department of Kinesiology, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, PA 16803, USA.

出版信息

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020 Dec;45(12):1324-1331. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0131. Epub 2020 Jun 5.

Abstract

We () identified alternative scoring strategies for the Female Athlete Triad Coalition cumulative risk assessment (CRA) tool to be utilized when particular risk factors (bone mineral density (BMD), oligomenorrhea/amenorrhea) cannot be determined; () objectively defined dietary restriction for use in the CRA tool; and () explored proxy measures of energy deficiency. This cross-sectional investigation of exercising women ( = 166) utilized an existing database derived from multiple studies designed to assess health, exercise, and menstrual function. Data from the screening/baseline period of each study included: anthropometrics, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, disordered eating questionnaires, descriptive data, and proxy measures of energy deficiency (total triiodothyronine (TT) and ratio of measured-to-predicted resting metabolic rate (mRMR/pRMR)). Substituting delayed menarche for BMD was the best-fit replacement resulting in 15 (9%) participants being categorized in different clearance categories. When menstrual status cannot be assessed, such as during hormonal contraceptive use, low energy availability (EA) determined using self-report and disordered eating questionnaires was the best substitution, resulting in 34 (20%) participants being categorized in different clearance categories. Based on original clearance categorizations, the provisional group had lower TT (78.3 ± 2.2 ng/dL; 92.7 ± 2.7 ng/dL) and Harris-Benedict mRMR/pRMR (0.85 ± 0.01; 0.90 ± 0.01) than the full group. Until an updated risk assessment tool is developed, delayed menarche can substitute for low BMD and low EA for oligomenorrhea/amenorrhea. This investigation addresses previous limitations of the Triad CRA tool. Disordered eating questionnaires can be used to objectively identify dietary restriction for the low EA risk factor. When a risk factor cannot be assessed, delayed menarche can substitute for low BMD and low EA for oligomenorrhea/amenorrhea.

摘要

我们()确定了女性运动员三联征联盟累积风险评估(CRA)工具的替代评分策略,以便在无法确定特定风险因素(骨矿物质密度(BMD)、月经过少/闭经)时使用;()客观定义了用于CRA工具的饮食限制;并且()探索了能量缺乏的替代指标。这项对运动女性(n = 166)的横断面调查利用了一个现有的数据库,该数据库来自多项旨在评估健康、运动和月经功能的研究。每项研究筛查/基线期的数据包括:人体测量学、双能X线吸收法、饮食失调问卷、描述性数据以及能量缺乏的替代指标(总三碘甲状腺原氨酸(TT)和实测静息代谢率与预测静息代谢率之比(mRMR/pRMR))。用初潮延迟替代BMD是最合适的替代方法,导致15名(9%)参与者被归类到不同的清除类别中。当无法评估月经状态时,例如在使用激素避孕药期间,使用自我报告和饮食失调问卷确定的低能量可利用性(EA)是最佳替代方法,导致34名(20%)参与者被归类到不同的清除类别中。基于原始的清除类别划分,临时组的TT(78.3±2.2 ng/dL;92.7±2.7 ng/dL)和哈里斯-本尼迪克特mRMR/pRMR(0.85±0.01;0.90±0.01)低于完整组。在开发出更新的风险评估工具之前,初潮延迟可替代低BMD,低EA可替代月经过少/闭经。 这项调查解决了三联征CRA工具以前的局限性。饮食失调问卷可用于客观识别低EA风险因素的饮食限制。当无法评估风险因素时,初潮延迟可替代低BMD,低EA可替代月经过少/闭经。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验