Addad M, Bénézech M
Université de Bar-Ilan, Ramat-Gan, Israël.
Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1988 Oct;146(10):927-39.
A group of imprisoned criminals was compared to two groups of not-criminals with regard to five modes of judgment (profile of judgment) measured by Baruk's Tsedek test. The delinquents use more self-interest judgment, social judgment and absence of judgment that the whole of the not-delinquents (significantly different). They more often use the mode of moral judgment than the not-delinquents of the control group (general population) but less often than the not-delinquents of the comparative group (subjects of high educational level and religious for more than half of them). From the profile of judgment obtained for each group, a formula of prediction of tendency to crime was elaborated. It makes it possible to classify with rather good reliability the persons tested in the category of criminals or not-criminals.
通过巴鲁克的“正义”测试所测量的五种判断模式(判断概况),将一组被监禁的罪犯与两组非罪犯进行了比较。与全体非罪犯相比,少年犯更多地使用自我利益判断、社会判断和无判断(差异显著)。他们比对照组(普通人群)的非罪犯更频繁地使用道德判断模式,但比比较组(其中一半以上是高学历和宗教人士)的非罪犯使用频率更低。根据为每组获得的判断概况,制定了一个犯罪倾向预测公式。这使得能够以相当高的可靠性将接受测试的人分类为罪犯或非罪犯类别。