Physiotherapy Department, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia.
School of Physiotherapy, Faulty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Feb;44(4):509-519. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1769207. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
To identify and appraise the existing clinical practice guidelines, consensus statements and Cochrane systematic reviews for the management of adult and paediatric focal spasticity to generate a single synthesized guideline.
Systematic review of 12 electronic databases. Clinical practice guidelines, consensus statements and Cochrane systematic reviews for focal spasticity in adults and children. Included studies were appraised according to the AGREE II criteria.
A total of 25 papers were included in this review, comprising 12 clinical practice guidelines, nine consensus statements and four Cochrane systematic reviews. The areas most strongly endorsed were: (1) management to be provided by a multi-disciplinary team, (2) therapy should be goal-directed, (3) goals to be developed in conjunction with the patient and family, and (4) importance of follow-up evaluations. There was a greater focus on activity outcomes and classification in the paediatric papers. The guidelines varied considerably in their quality, with AGREE II scores ranging from 52.8 to 97.1%.
This systematic review has synthesized the key elements regarding principles of focal spasticity management, outcome measures, physical interventions and educational recommendations into a single, readily applied guideline available for clinical use. Despite considerable variability in the quality of the guidelines, several strong themes emerged.Implications for rehabilitationFocal spasticity management should be multi-disciplinary, patient-centred and goal-directed.Routine measurement of impairment and activity are strongly endorsed.Botulinum toxin A injection should only be provided as part of an integrated approach to focal spasticity management.
识别和评价现有的成人和儿科局灶性痉挛管理的临床实践指南、共识声明和 Cochrane 系统评价,以生成单一的综合指南。
对 12 个电子数据库进行系统评价。成人和儿童局灶性痉挛的临床实践指南、共识声明和 Cochrane 系统评价。根据 AGREE II 标准评估纳入研究。
共纳入 25 篇文献,包括 12 项临床实践指南、9 项共识声明和 4 项 Cochrane 系统评价。支持最强的领域包括:(1)由多学科团队提供管理,(2)治疗应具有目标导向,(3)目标应与患者和家属共同制定,(4)重视随访评估。儿科文献更注重活动结果和分类。指南在质量上存在很大差异,AGREE II 评分从 52.8 到 97.1%不等。
本系统评价将局灶性痉挛管理的原则、结局测量、物理干预和教育建议等关键要素综合为一个单一的、易于应用的指南,供临床使用。尽管指南的质量存在很大差异,但出现了几个强有力的主题。
局灶性痉挛管理应采用多学科、以患者为中心和以目标为导向的方法。强烈支持常规测量损伤和活动。肉毒毒素 A 注射仅应作为局灶性痉挛管理综合方法的一部分提供。