Suppr超能文献

精神障碍计算机辅助 DIA-X-5 访谈的重测信度。

Test-retest reliability of the computer-assisted DIA-X-5 interview for mental disorders.

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Behavioral Epidemiology, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02653-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a need of comprehensive standardized diagnostic assessment tools of psychopathology that match recent changes in diagnostic classification systems, such as the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Therefore, the computer-assisted DIA-X-5 was developed and its test-retest reliability was explored. The DIA-X-5 is based on the DIA-X/M-CIDI (Diagnostisches Expertensystem für psychische Störungen/Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview) which referred to the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV).

METHODS

A convenience sample (N = 60, age: 15-67) was interviewed twice with the computer-assisted DIA-X-5 interview, on average nine days apart, by trained and blinded interviewers. The DIA-X-5 is a standardized instrument for research purposes covering symptoms, syndromes and diagnoses from eleven classes of mental disorders according to the DSM-5 with matching F codes of the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10).

RESULTS

Kappa values ranged from 0.90 for post-traumatic stress disorder to 0.30 for social anxiety disorder. For age of onset and age of recency, test-retest reliability as measured by intra-class correlation was satisfying with values above 0.90 for most disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Test-retest reliability of the DIA-X-5 syndromes and diagnoses were comparable to those of previous DSM-IV/DIA-X diagnoses for most disorders. Due to low case numbers for some diagnoses, further research in larger samples is required.

摘要

背景

需要有全面的标准化精神病理学诊断评估工具来匹配最新的诊断分类系统的变化,如《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第 5 版(DSM-5)。因此,开发了计算机辅助的 DIA-X-5,并探讨了其重测信度。DIA-X-5 基于 DIA-X/M-CIDI(精神障碍诊断专家系统/慕尼黑复合国际诊断访谈),该系统参考了《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第 4 版(DSM-IV)。

方法

采用方便样本(N=60,年龄 15-67 岁),由经过培训和盲法访谈的访谈者,使用计算机辅助的 DIA-X-5 访谈进行两次访谈,两次访谈平均间隔九天。DIA-X-5 是一种标准化的研究工具,涵盖了根据 DSM-5 分类的 11 类精神障碍的症状、综合征和诊断,以及与 10 版《国际疾病分类》(ICD-10)相匹配的 F 代码。

结果

Kappa 值范围从创伤后应激障碍的 0.90 到社交焦虑障碍的 0.30。对于发病年龄和最近发病年龄,大多数疾病的内类相关系数测量的重测信度令人满意,值高于 0.90。

结论

DIA-X-5 综合征和诊断的重测信度与大多数疾病之前的 DSM-IV/DIA-X 诊断相当。由于某些诊断的病例数量较少,需要在更大的样本中进行进一步的研究。

相似文献

1
Test-retest reliability of the computer-assisted DIA-X-5 interview for mental disorders.
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02653-6.
2
[Diagnostic structured interviews in child and adolescent's psychiatry].
Encephale. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):122-34. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95422-x.
4
ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 May;52(5):425-434. doi: 10.1177/0004867417727867. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
5
Test-retest reliability of the computerized DSM-IV version of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI).
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;33(11):568-78. doi: 10.1007/s001270050095.
7
Test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5.
CNS Spectr. 2014 Jun;19(3):256-67. doi: 10.1017/S1092852913000710. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
10
Test-retest reliability of DSM-5 substance disorder measures as assessed with the PRISM-5, a clinician-administered diagnostic interview.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Nov 1;216:108294. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108294. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

3
Characteristic of mental health app usage: a cross-sectional survey in the general population.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 12;24(1):3133. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20500-1.
4
Longitudinal associations between depressive symptoms and cell deformability: do glucocorticoids play a role?
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Sep 16. doi: 10.1007/s00406-024-01902-z.
5
Mental health apps within the healthcare system: associations with stigma and mental health literacy.
Arch Public Health. 2024 Aug 16;82(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01362-w.
6
Subclinical patterns of disordered eating behaviors in the daily life of adolescents and young adults from the general population.
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 Jun 6;18(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13034-024-00752-w.
7
Psychometric Properties of the Diagnostic Interview for Sexual Dysfunctions in Women in a Symptom-Reporting Sample.
Assessment. 2025 Jun;32(4):590-607. doi: 10.1177/10731911241253659. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
8
Social Interactions in Everyday Life of Socially Anxious Adolescents: Effects on Mental State, Anxiety, and Depression.
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2024 Feb;52(2):207-222. doi: 10.1007/s10802-023-01121-5. Epub 2023 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

3
Prevalence of mental disorders in elderly people: the European MentDis_ICF65+ study.
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;210(2):125-131. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.180463. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
4
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
5
The 'Early Developmental Stages of Psychopathology (EDSP) study': a 20-year review of methods and findings.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;50(6):851-66. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1062-x. Epub 2015 May 16.
7
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
10
Test-retest reliability of the computerized DSM-IV version of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI).
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;33(11):568-78. doi: 10.1007/s001270050095.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验