• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Private well stewardship within a rural, agricultural Latino community: a qualitative study.农村农业拉丁裔社区私人水井管理:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):863. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08963-4.
2
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
3
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
4
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
5
Interventions to improve water quality for preventing diarrhoea.改善水质以预防腹泻的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 20;2015(10):CD004794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004794.pub3.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioral determinants of arsenic-safe water use among Great Plains Indian Nation private well users: results from the Community-Led Strong Heart Water Study Arsenic Mitigation Program.大平原印第安民族私人水井使用者砷安全用水行为决定因素:来自“社区主导的坚强心灵水研究砷缓解计划”的结果。
Environ Health. 2023 May 15;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12940-023-00965-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Perceptions Toward Drinking Water Quality Among Private Well Owners in Ireland: The Illusion of Control.爱尔兰私人水井所有者对饮用水水质的风险认知:控制幻觉。
Risk Anal. 2019 Aug;39(8):1741-1754. doi: 10.1111/risa.13283. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
2
Environmental justice and drinking water quality: are there socioeconomic disparities in nitrate levels in U.S. drinking water?环境公正与饮用水水质:美国饮用水中的硝酸盐水平是否存在社会经济差异?
Environ Health. 2019 Jan 17;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12940-018-0442-6.
3
A Comparison of Water-Related Perceptions and Practices Among West Texas and South New Mexico Colonia Residents Using Hauled-Stored and Private Well Water.使用罐装储存水和私人井水的西德克萨斯州和新墨西哥州南部殖民地居民对与水相关的认知和实践的比较
J Environ Health. 2016 Sep;79(2):14-20.
4
The Case for Universal Screening of Private Well Water Quality in the U.S. and Testing Requirements to Achieve It: Evidence from Arsenic.美国私人井水水质普遍筛查的理由及实现筛查的检测要求:来自砷的证据
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Aug 3;125(8):085002. doi: 10.1289/EHP629.
5
Improving the asthma disparity gap with legal advocacy? A qualitative study of patient-identified challenges to improve social and environmental factors that contribute to poorly controlled asthma.通过法律宣传缩小哮喘治疗差距?一项关于患者所确认的改善导致哮喘控制不佳的社会和环境因素的挑战的定性研究。
J Asthma. 2018 Aug;55(8):924-932. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1373393. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
6
Strategies to Improve Private-Well Water Quality: A North Carolina Perspective.改善私人井水水质的策略:北卡罗来纳州视角
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Jul 7;125(7):076001. doi: 10.1289/EHP890.
7
Arsenic in private well water part 2 of 3: Who benefits the most from traditional testing promotion?私人井水中的砷 三部曲之第二部:谁从传统检测推广中获益最大?
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Aug 15;562:1010-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.199. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
8
Arsenic in private well water part 3 of 3: Socioeconomic vulnerability to exposure in Maine and New Jersey.私人水井水中的砷 第3部分:缅因州和新泽西州暴露的社会经济脆弱性
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Aug 15;562:1019-1030. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.217. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
9
Influences on domestic well water testing behavior in a Central Maine area with frequent groundwater arsenic occurrence.缅因州中部地区地下水砷含量频繁出现对家庭井水检测行为的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Feb 1;505:1274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.017. Epub 2014 May 26.
10
Dissemination of well water arsenic results to homeowners in Central Maine: influences on mitigation behavior and continued risks for exposure.缅因州中部井水砷含量检测结果向居民的通报:对缓解措施行为的影响及持续的接触风险
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Feb 1;505:1282-90. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.079. Epub 2014 Apr 13.

农村农业拉丁裔社区私人水井管理:一项定性研究。

Private well stewardship within a rural, agricultural Latino community: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.

Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):863. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08963-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-08963-4
PMID:32503551
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7275588/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nitrate contamination in groundwater disproportionately impacts agricultural Latino communities, creating a significant hazard for Latinos that rely on private wells. Private well users must conduct water testing and other well stewardship behaviors to ensure that their well water is safe to drink. This study sought to identify the key factors impacting private well water testing behavior in rural, agricultural Latino communities.

METHODS

We conducted 4 focus groups with private well users, 2 in Spanish and 2 in English. We recruited 37 participants from the Lower Yakima Valley, Washington State, a rural, agricultural community with a large Latino population and elevated nitrate concentrations in groundwater. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to capture factors impacting testing as guided by the Risk, Attitudes, Norms, Ability, and Self-Regulation (RANAS) model. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted by two coders to identify common themes.

RESULTS

Themes emerged around the factors impacting well stewardship, including well water testing, treatment, and maintenance, and were not specific to nitrate contamination. Private well users reported many of the same factors reported in other communities, with the exception of home repair experience and challenges around landlords and neighbors on shared wells, which have not been reported previously. In addition to landlords and neighbors, lack of actionable information, economic limitations, and lack of technical support emerged as factors that made well stewardship burdensome for individuals. The majority of participants reported using bottled water, including many who used point-of-use or point-of-entry water treatment systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The burden of well stewardship in rural, agricultural Latino communities may suggest the need for interventions at the community, county, or state levels and not at the individual level alone. Additionally, the role of landlords, neighbors on shared wells, and home repair experience in well stewardship represent important areas of exploration for researchers and public health practitioners.

摘要

背景

地下水硝酸盐污染对农业拉丁裔社区的影响不成比例,给依赖私人水井的拉丁裔人群带来了重大危险。私人水井用户必须进行水质检测和其他水井管理行为,以确保饮用水的安全。本研究旨在确定影响农村农业拉丁裔社区私人水井水质检测行为的关键因素。

方法

我们在华盛顿州雅基马河谷(Lower Yakima Valley)进行了 4 组焦点小组讨论,其中 2 组为西班牙语,2 组为英语。我们从一个农村农业社区招募了 37 名参与者,该社区拉丁裔人口众多,地下水硝酸盐浓度较高。根据风险、态度、规范、能力和自我调节(RANAS)模型,制定了半结构化访谈指南,以捕获影响测试的因素。两位编码员通过归纳主题分析确定了共同主题。

结果

主题围绕着影响水井管理的因素展开,包括水井水质检测、处理和维护,而不仅仅是硝酸盐污染。与其他社区一样,私人水井用户报告了许多相同的因素,但没有报告房东和邻居在共用水井方面的经验和挑战,这是以前没有报道过的。除了房东和邻居之外,缺乏可操作的信息、经济限制以及缺乏技术支持等因素也使得个人的水井管理负担沉重。大多数参与者报告使用瓶装水,包括许多使用点源或入口水过滤系统的人。

结论

农村农业拉丁裔社区水井管理的负担可能表明需要在社区、县或州一级采取干预措施,而不仅仅是在个人一级。此外,房东、共用水井的邻居以及房屋维修经验在水井管理中的作用是研究人员和公共卫生从业者需要探索的重要领域。