Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Radiology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Aug;302(2):455-462. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05565-8. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
Cervical cancer is still one of the main causes of death in females. Conventional diagnostic tools such as colposcopy are still unsatisfactory, so accurate diagnostic tools for cervical diseases are needed. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to perform a clinical study to evaluate the value of microendoscopic imaging systems in the diagnosis of cervical precancerous lesions and cervical microinvasive carcinoma (MIC).
Totally 106 patients ranging in age from 23 to 67 years were recruited. All patients had abnormal thin-layer cytology (TCT) results (≥ low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions) and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity. Each patient was first subjected to ordinary colposcopy, followed by microendoscopy and biopsy. All results of the colposcopy and microendoscopy images were compared to the histopathological diagnosis.
Characteristics of pathological blood vessels were easily distinguished by microendoscopy compared with ordinary colposcopy. The diagnostic agreement rate of microendoscopy with the pathological diagnosis was higher (95.3%) than that of ordinary colposcopy (37.7%) (weighted kappa = 0.863, P < .01). When diagnosing HSIL and more advanced disease, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the microendoscopic diagnosis were significantly higher than those of ordinary colposcopy (97.6 and 38.1%), (95.5 and 63.6%), (98.8 and 80.0%), (91.3 and 21.2%) and (97.7 and 43.4%), respectively.
This study shows that microendoscopy has important value in the diagnosis of cervical lesions which can provide real-time diagnosis in vivo without staining, particularly for lesions that are not sensitive to acetic acid staining.
宫颈癌仍然是女性死亡的主要原因之一。传统的诊断工具,如阴道镜检查,仍然不尽如人意,因此需要更准确的宫颈疾病诊断工具。因此,本研究旨在进行一项临床研究,评估微内窥镜成像系统在诊断宫颈癌前病变和宫颈微浸润癌(MIC)中的价值。
共纳入年龄 23 岁至 67 岁的 106 例患者。所有患者均有异常薄层细胞学(TCT)结果(≥低级别鳞状上皮内病变)和高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)阳性。每位患者首先接受普通阴道镜检查,然后进行微内窥镜检查和活检。将阴道镜和微内窥镜图像的所有结果与组织病理学诊断进行比较。
与普通阴道镜相比,微内窥镜更容易区分病理性血管特征。微内窥镜与病理诊断的诊断一致性率(95.3%)高于普通阴道镜(37.7%)(加权 Kappa=0.863,P<0.01)。在诊断 HSIL 和更高级别疾病时,微内窥镜诊断的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性均显著高于普通阴道镜(97.6%和 38.1%)、(95.5%和 63.6%)、(98.8%和 80.0%)、(91.3%和 21.2%)和(97.7%和 43.4%)。
本研究表明,微内窥镜在宫颈病变诊断中具有重要价值,可实时提供体内诊断,无需染色,特别是对于对醋酸染色不敏感的病变。