Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.
Norwich Medical School (University of East Anglia), Norwich, UK.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(10):3692-3701. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08513-7. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
Perioperative complications following inguinal lymphadenectomy, including seroma formation, are frequent. We have employed a 2-layer negative pressure wound therapy (2-LNPWT) as a method to reduce seroma rate and perioperative complications. We present the outcome of our initial experience with 2-LNPWT and compare the outcomes of its use with traditional closed suction drains (CSDs).
A non-randomised retrospective case-control series was analysed. Surgeons performing inguinal lymphadenectomy for metastatic cutaneous melanoma utilised either the 2-LNPWT therapy or traditional CSDs according to their practice preference.
The study included 111 patients. The cohorts were well matched for gender, disease burden, body mass index and comorbidities. The 2-LNPWT technique was associated with significantly better postoperative outcomes than CSD, in terms of incidence of seroma formation (26.9% vs 49.4%; p < 0.03), period of drainage (15 days vs 20 days; p = 0.005) and return to theatre rate (0% vs 15.3%; p = 0.03). The overall seroma rate was 44.1%. The only significant association with seroma initiation was the type of drainage system used (2-LNPWT 31.2% vs CSD 58.3%; p < 0.03; OR 3.0). The method of drainage did not alter the course of an established seroma. There was no significant difference in overall or disease-specific survival detected between the 2 groups.
This retrospective non-randomised case control study has demonstrated the safe use of a novel application of negative pressure wound therapy that significantly reduced the incidence of seroma formation and postoperative complication rate for inguinal lymphadenectomy for melanoma.
腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后的围手术期并发症,包括血清肿形成,较为常见。我们采用了双层负压伤口治疗(2-LNPWT)来降低血清肿发生率和围手术期并发症。我们报告了我们在 2-LNPWT 初始经验的结果,并比较了其与传统封闭引流(CSD)的使用结果。
对非随机回顾性病例对照系列进行了分析。进行腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的外科医生根据其手术偏好,使用 2-LNPWT 治疗或传统 CSD。
研究纳入了 111 名患者。两组在性别、疾病负担、体重指数和合并症方面匹配良好。与 CSD 相比,2-LNPWT 技术在术后结果方面具有显著优势,表现在血清肿形成的发生率(26.9% vs 49.4%;p < 0.03)、引流时间(15 天 vs 20 天;p = 0.005)和再次手术率(0% vs 15.3%;p = 0.03)。总体血清肿发生率为 44.1%。唯一与血清肿发生显著相关的因素是引流系统的类型(2-LNPWT 为 31.2%,CSD 为 58.3%;p < 0.03;OR 3.0)。引流方式并不能改变已形成的血清肿的病程。两组之间在总生存率或疾病特异性生存率方面没有显著差异。
这项回顾性非随机病例对照研究表明,使用新型负压伤口治疗方法是安全的,可显著降低黑色素瘤腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后血清肿形成和术后并发症的发生率。