Stokke Mathis K, Castrini Anna I, Aneq Meriam Åström, Jensen Henrik Kjærulf, Madsen Trine, Hansen Jim, Bundgaard Henning, Gilljam Thomas, Platonov Pyotr G, Svendsen Jesper Hastrup, Edvardsen Thor, Haugaa Kristina H
Center for Cardiological Innovation, Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Center for Cardiological Innovation, Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Norway.
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 15;317:152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.095. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
In Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC), electrophysiological pathology has been claimed to precede morphological and functional pathology. Accordingly, an ECG without ARVC markers should be rare in ARVC patients with pathology identified by cardiac imaging. We quantified the prevalence of ARVC patients with evidence of structural disease, yet without ECG Task Force Criteria (TFC).
We included 182 probands and family members with ARVC-associated mutations (40 ± 17 years, 50% women, 73% PKP2 mutations) from the Nordic ARVC Registry in a cross-sectional analysis. For echocardiography and cardiac MR (CMR), we differentiated between "abnormalities" and TFC. "Abnormalities" were defined as RV functional or structural measures outside TFC reference values, without combinations required to fulfill TFC. ECG TFC were used as defined, as these are not composite parameters. We found that only 4% of patients with ARVC fulfilled echocardiographic TFC without any ECG TFC. However, importantly, 38% of patients had imaging abnormalities without any ECG TFC. These results were supported by CMR data from a subset of 51 patients: 16% fulfilled CMR TFC without fulfilling ECG TFC, while 24% had CMR abnormalities without any ECG TFC. In a multivariate analysis, echocardiographic TFC were associated with arrhythmic events.
More than one third of ARVC genotype positive patients had subtle imaging abnormalities without fulfilling ECG TFC. Although most patients will have both imaging and ECG abnormalities, structural abnormalities in ARVC genotype positive patients cannot be ruled out by the absence of ECG TFC.
在致心律失常性右室心肌病(ARVC)中,电生理病理学被认为先于形态学和功能病理学出现。因此,在通过心脏成像确定存在病理学改变的ARVC患者中,没有ARVC标志物的心电图应该很少见。我们对有结构疾病证据但不符合心电图工作组标准(TFC)的ARVC患者的患病率进行了量化。
我们纳入了来自北欧ARVC注册中心的182名携带ARVC相关突变的先证者和家庭成员(40±17岁,50%为女性,73%为PKP2突变)进行横断面分析。对于超声心动图和心脏磁共振成像(CMR),我们区分了“异常”和TFC。“异常”被定义为超出TFC参考值的右室功能或结构指标,无需满足TFC所需的组合。心电图TFC按既定定义使用,因为它们不是复合参数。我们发现,只有4%的ARVC患者符合超声心动图TFC但不符合任何心电图TFC。然而,重要的是,38%的患者有影像学异常但不符合任何心电图TFC。来自51名患者子集的CMR数据支持了这些结果:16%的患者符合CMR TFC但不符合心电图TFC,而24%的患者有CMR异常但不符合任何心电图TFC。在多变量分析中,超声心动图TFC与心律失常事件相关。
超过三分之一的ARVC基因型阳性患者有细微的影像学异常但不符合心电图TFC。虽然大多数患者会同时有影像学和心电图异常,但ARVC基因型阳性患者的结构异常不能因无心电图TFC而排除。