• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在无法使用分子方法的实验室中实施快速 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测:一家综合医院的经验。

Implementation of rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigenic testing in a laboratory without access to molecular methods: Experiences of a general hospital.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Iris Hospitals South, Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Iris Hospitals South, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Pharmacy, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, University of Namur, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104472. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104472. Epub 2020 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104472
PMID:32504944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7261076/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 Ag (Antigen) Respi-Strip assay is a new immunochromatographic diagnostic tool recently available for antigenic diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. The proposed sensitivity is not higher than 60 %, but its high specificity allows both quick decisions for the management of patients and confirmation by molecular diagnosis for only negative tests. However, from the first tests performed, we suspected that the sensitivity observed with routine use was much lower than that announced by the manufacturer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a period of one month, we compared the negative results obtained with the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip kit with those obtained from qRT-PCR performed in a laboratory qualified for the molecular diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. All samples tested were naso-pharyngeal smears from UTM-RT medium.

RESULTS

Of 774 patients tested, 714 negative samples were sent for confirmation, and 159 were found to be positive by qRT-PCR. The median positive percentage agreement was 23.9 % (95 % CI: 14.2 %-38.2 %). The Cohen's kappa score was 0.35.

CONCLUSION

Using this immunochromatographic assay as a triage test did not significantly reduce the number of samples outsourced for COVID-19 confirmation by qRT-PCR. In addition, even if the turn-around time is short, the assay is completely manual, which is not suitable for large volumes of routine samples. The sensitivity of this rapid test is poor, and improvements are needed to enhance its performance.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 Ag(抗原)Respi-Strip 检测法是一种新的免疫层析诊断工具,最近可用于 SARS-CoV-2 的抗原诊断。提出的灵敏度不高于 60%,但其高特异性允许快速做出决策来管理患者,并仅对阴性检测进行分子诊断确认。然而,从最初的测试中,我们怀疑常规使用中观察到的灵敏度远低于制造商宣布的灵敏度。

材料和方法

在一个月的时间里,我们将 COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip 试剂盒获得的阴性结果与在经过 SARS-CoV-2 分子诊断资格认证的实验室进行的 qRT-PCR 获得的结果进行了比较。所有测试的样本均为来自 UTM-RT 介质的鼻咽拭子。

结果

在 774 名接受测试的患者中,有 714 个阴性样本被送确认,其中 159 个样本经 qRT-PCR 检测为阳性。阳性百分比的中位数符合率为 23.9%(95%CI:14.2%-38.2%)。Cohen's kappa 评分是 0.35。

结论

将这种免疫层析检测法作为一种分诊测试并不能显著减少需要进行 qRT-PCR 确认的 COVID-19 样本数量。此外,即使周转时间很短,该检测法完全是手动操作,不适合常规样本的大量检测。这种快速检测的灵敏度较差,需要改进以提高其性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bece/7261076/4d654d8c5a76/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bece/7261076/4d654d8c5a76/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bece/7261076/4d654d8c5a76/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigenic testing in a laboratory without access to molecular methods: Experiences of a general hospital.在无法使用分子方法的实验室中实施快速 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测:一家综合医院的经验。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104472. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104472. Epub 2020 May 30.
2
Development and Potential Usefulness of the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip Diagnostic Assay in a Pandemic Context.COVID-19抗原呼吸检测试纸诊断检测方法在大流行背景下的开发及潜在用途
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 May 8;7:225. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00225. eCollection 2020.
3
Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis.快速抗原检测试验在 COVID-19 诊断中的一线检测性能不佳。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104455. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104455. Epub 2020 May 21.
4
Evaluation of a novel antigen-based rapid detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory samples.评价一种新型基于抗原的快速检测试验,用于呼吸道样本中 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;99:328-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.098. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
5
Evaluation of Two Rapid Antigenic Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Nasopharyngeal Swabs.两种用于检测鼻咽拭子中新型冠状病毒的快速抗原检测方法的评估
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 24;10(13):2774. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132774.
6
Rapid Serological Assays and SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2: Comparative Study.用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的快速血清学检测和SARS-CoV-2实时聚合酶链反应检测:比较研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 30;22(10):e19152. doi: 10.2196/19152.
7
SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM Rapid Test as a Diagnostic Tool in Hospitalized Patients and Healthcare Workers, at a large Teaching Hospital in northern Italy, during the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic.2020年新冠疫情期间,在意大利北部一家大型教学医院,将严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型IgG/IgM快速检测作为住院患者和医护人员的诊断工具。
New Microbiol. 2020 Oct;43(4):161-165. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
8
Routine Laboratory Blood Tests Predict SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Machine Learning.常规实验室血液检测可通过机器学习预测 SARS-CoV-2 感染。
Clin Chem. 2020 Nov 1;66(11):1396-1404. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa200.
9
The Coris BioConcept COVID 19 Ag Respi-Strip, a field experience feedback.科里思生物概念 COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip,现场经验反馈。
J Virol Methods. 2022 Feb;300:114366. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114366. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
10
Comparison of the Accula SARS-CoV-2 Test with a Laboratory-Developed Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Clinical Nasopharyngeal Specimens.Accula SARS-CoV-2 检测与实验室自建检测在临床鼻咽拭子标本中检测 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01072-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests for COVID-19 compared to the viral genetic test in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较 COVID-19 快速抗原检测与成人病毒基因检测的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Oct 1;22(10):1939-2002. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00291.
2
Personnel Scheduling during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Probabilistic Graph-Based Approach.新冠疫情期间的人员调度:一种基于概率图的方法。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 3;11(13):1917. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131917.
3
Identification of B-Cell Linear Epitopes in the Nucleocapsid (N) Protein B-Cell Linear Epitopes Conserved among the Main SARS-CoV-2 Variants.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Potential Usefulness of the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip Diagnostic Assay in a Pandemic Context.COVID-19抗原呼吸检测试纸诊断检测方法在大流行背景下的开发及潜在用途
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 May 8;7:225. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00225. eCollection 2020.
2
Validation of a chemiluminescent assay for specific SARS-CoV-2 antibody.用于特定 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的化学发光测定法的验证。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jul 28;58(8):1357-1364. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0594.
3
Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases.
鉴定核衣壳(N)蛋白中的 B 细胞线性表位 主要 SARS-CoV-2 变体中保守的 B 细胞线性表位。
Viruses. 2023 Apr 6;15(4):923. doi: 10.3390/v15040923.
4
Lateral Flow Immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2.用于检测新型冠状病毒的侧向流动免疫分析方法。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 18;12(11):2854. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112854.
5
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
6
Performance of Antigen Detection Tests for SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新型冠状病毒抗原检测试验的性能:系统评价与荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 4;12(6):1388. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061388.
7
Rapid antigenic test (TRA) versus RT-PCR: Experience of CHU IBN ROCHD Casablanca.快速抗原检测(TRA)与逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)对比:卡萨布兰卡伊本·鲁世德大学医院中心的经验
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Jul;79:103908. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103908. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
8
SARS-CoV-2 RNA Detection on Environmental Surfaces in a University Setting of Central Italy.意大利中部一大学环境表面上的 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 检测。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 3;19(9):5560. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095560.
9
Antigen Detection Tests for SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis on real world data.抗原检测试验用于 SARS-CoV-2:基于真实世界数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Biomed. 2022 May 11;93(2):e2022036. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i2.11031.
10
Field evaluation of the performance of seven Antigen Rapid diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of SARs-CoV-2 virus infection in Uganda.在乌干达现场评估七种抗原快速诊断检测试剂用于 SARS-CoV-2 病毒感染诊断的性能。
PLoS One. 2022 May 10;17(5):e0265334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265334. eCollection 2022.
中国 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的胸部 CT 与 RT-PCR 检测的相关性:1014 例报告。
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E32-E40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200642. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
4
Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR.胸部CT对新型冠状病毒肺炎的敏感性:与逆转录聚合酶链反应的比较。
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E115-E117. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200432. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
5
Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes.2019-nCoV 感染患者的分子和血清学调查:多种脱落途径的意义。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Feb 17;9(1):386-389. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1729071. eCollection 2020.
6
Chest CT for Typical Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia: Relationship to Negative RT-PCR Testing.胸部 CT 与典型 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)肺炎:与阴性 RT-PCR 检测的关系。
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E41-E45. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200343. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
7
Method agreement analysis: a review of correct methodology.方法学一致性分析:对正确方法学的综述。
Theriogenology. 2010 Jun;73(9):1167-79. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.01.003.