• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经食管切除术患者使用鼻胃管:多此一举?

Nasogastric tube utilization after esophagectomy: an unnecessary gesture?

机构信息

Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo. Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España.

Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo. Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España.

出版信息

Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2020 Dec;98(10):598-604. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.04.021
PMID:32505557
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Nasogastric decompressive tube utilization has been accepted as one of the basic perioperative care measures after esophageal resection surgery. However, with the development of multimodal rehabilitation programs and without clear evidence to support their use, the systematic indication of this measure may be controversial.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective, descriptive and comparative study of patients who had undergone Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in our center -from January 2015 to December 2018- with placement (Group S), or without placement (Group N) of a decompressive tube in gastroplasty during postoperative period. Epidemiological variables and differences between groups in post-surgical morbidity and mortality, hospital stay, onset of oral tolerance and the need for nasogastric tube placement were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients were included in this study, with a median age of 61 years, being 86% male. 46.5% were hypertensive, 25.5% had lung disease and 16.3% had diabetes mellitus. The median length of hospital stay was 9 days in group S versus 11.5 days in group N, with no differences in the onset of oral tolerance. Anastomotic dehiscence rate was 5% and 0% respectively. The overall mortality was 2.3% in the first 90 days, without differences between the groups. Placement of nasogastric tube during postoperative period was required only in 1 patient (4.3%) of the group N.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-use of nasogastric tube during postoperative period of an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is a safe measure, as it is not associated with a higher rate of complications or hospital stay. This fact may be able to improve patients' comfort and postoperative recovery.

摘要

简介

鼻胃减压管的使用已被认为是食管切除术后基本围手术期护理措施之一。然而,随着多模式康复计划的发展,并且没有明确的证据支持其使用,该措施的系统适应证可能存在争议。

材料与方法

回顾性、描述性和比较研究,纳入 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月在我中心行 Ivor-Lewis 食管切除术的患者,术中胃成形术时放置(S 组)或不放置(N 组)减压管。评估术后发病率和死亡率、住院时间、口服耐受开始时间和需要放置鼻胃管的差异等。

结果

共纳入 43 例患者,中位年龄 61 岁,86%为男性,46.5%为高血压,25.5%有肺部疾病,16.3%有糖尿病。S 组中位住院时间为 9 天,N 组为 11.5 天,两组口服耐受开始时间无差异。吻合口裂开率分别为 5%和 0%。90 天内总死亡率为 2.3%,两组间无差异。N 组仅 1 例(4.3%)需要放置鼻胃管。

结论

Ivor-Lewis 食管切除术术后不使用鼻胃管是一种安全的措施,因为它与并发症或住院时间增加无关。这一事实可能有助于改善患者的舒适度和术后恢复。

相似文献

1
Nasogastric tube utilization after esophagectomy: an unnecessary gesture?经食管切除术患者使用鼻胃管:多此一举?
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2020 Dec;98(10):598-604. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
2
An improved method for gastric tube and anastomotic anvil placement during thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.一种改良的胸腔镜和腹腔镜 Ivor Lewis 食管癌根治术中胃管和吻合器砧座放置方法。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 May 28;18(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01892-x.
3
Nasogastric decompression following esophagectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.食管癌切除术后的鼻胃管减压:一项系统的文献综述和荟萃分析
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Feb 1;30(3):1-8. doi: 10.1111/dote.12530.
4
Treatment of intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy with the sump drainage tube.胸腔内吻合口漏食管切除术后使用引流管治疗。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar 23;16(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01429-7.
5
[Study on safety and feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy without the use of postoperative nasogastric tube decompression].[不使用术后鼻胃管减压的微创食管切除术的安全性和可行性研究]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;17(9):920-3.
6
Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer: a single center experience.癌症食管癌切除术患者的术后加速康复方案:单中心经验
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Apr 1;30(4):1-6. doi: 10.1093/dote/dow024.
7
Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy.经全咽-全喉切除术史的胸段食管鳞癌患者行 Ivor-Lewis 食管切除术。
Esophagus. 2019 Oct;16(4):382-385. doi: 10.1007/s10388-019-00677-w. Epub 2019 May 18.
8
Transcervical gastric tube drainage facilitates patient mobility and reduces the risk of pulmonary complications after esophagectomy.经宫颈胃管引流有助于食管癌切除术后患者的活动能力,并降低肺部并发症的风险。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Sep;12(9):1479-84. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0541-8. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
9
Role of self-expanding stents in the treatment of intrathoracic dehiscence after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2018 Nov;96(9):555-559. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
10
Routine placement of feeding jejunostomy tube during esophagectomy increases postoperative complications and does not improve postoperative malnutrition.常规放置空肠造口管在食管癌切除术中增加术后并发症,并且不能改善术后营养不良。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Jan 16;33(1). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz021.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Perioperative Care in Esophageal Surgery: The EUropean PErioperative MEdical Networking (EUPEMEN) Collaborative for Esophagectomy.优化食管癌手术围手术期护理:欧洲围手术期医学网络(EUPEMEN)食管癌切除术协作组
Diseases. 2025 Jul 22;13(8):231. doi: 10.3390/diseases13080231.
2
Early oral feeding and its impact on postoperative outcomes in head and neck cancer surgery: a meta-analysis.早期经口进食及其对头颈癌手术术后结局的影响:一项荟萃分析
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Mar 28;46(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40902-024-00421-0.
3
Routine nasogastric tube placement in patients with small esophageal perforation after endoscopic foreign body removal may be unnecessary: a propensity score matching analysis.
内镜下异物取出术后食管小穿孔患者常规放置鼻胃管可能不必要:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2023 Jul 29;11:goad044. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goad044. eCollection 2023.