Department of Dermatology, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia.
Int J Dermatol. 2020 Aug;59(8):962-968. doi: 10.1111/ijd.14985. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous disease. Thus, it is difficult to set up standard diagnostic criteria that cover the entire spectrum of AD patients. Our objectives were to study the epidemiologic characteristics of AD in Tunisia and to evaluate five diagnostic criteria (Hanifin and Rajka, Williams, Taieb and Boralevi, REACH and ISAAC questionnaire).
This prospective case-control study was carried out in our Dermatology Department in Tunisia. The cases and controls were collected over a period of one year (January 3, 2017, to January 2, 2018).
We collected 101 patients with AD and 101 controls. Patients and controls were comparable by age and gender. The mean age of patients was 9 years and 9 months with sex ratio 1.02. Children accounted for more than half of the patients (61.39%). The sensitivity and specificity of the criteria were, respectively: 90.1% and 90.1% for the Hanifin and Rajka criteria, 53.47% and 96.04% for the Williams criteria, 62.50% and 92.3% for the Taieb and Boralevi criteria, 41.58% and 92.08% for ISAAC questionnaire, 49.5% and 91.09% for REACH questionnaire. A new version of AD diagnostic criteria has been proposed. By applying these new criteria retrospectively to our patients, the sensitivity rises to 90.1%.
The new version of AD criteria is a practical diagnostic tool compared to the Hanifin and Rajka criteria and seems to correct the problem of low sensitivity of the Williams criteria. Large validation studies are needed.
特应性皮炎(AD)是一种异质性疾病。因此,很难制定涵盖所有 AD 患者的标准诊断标准。我们的目标是研究突尼斯 AD 的流行病学特征,并评估五个诊断标准(Hanifin 和 Rajka、Williams、Taieb 和 Boralevi、REACH 和 ISAAC 问卷)。
这是一项在突尼斯皮肤科进行的前瞻性病例对照研究。病例和对照在一年期间收集(2017 年 1 月 3 日至 2018 年 1 月 2 日)。
我们收集了 101 例 AD 患者和 101 例对照。患者和对照在年龄和性别方面具有可比性。患者的平均年龄为 9 岁 9 个月,性别比为 1.02。儿童占患者的一半以上(61.39%)。标准的敏感性和特异性分别为:Hanifin 和 Rajka 标准为 90.1%和 90.1%,Williams 标准为 53.47%和 96.04%,Taieb 和 Boralevi 标准为 62.50%和 92.3%,ISAAC 问卷为 41.58%和 92.08%,REACH 问卷为 49.5%和 91.09%。提出了一种新的 AD 诊断标准版本。通过将这些新标准回顾性地应用于我们的患者,敏感性提高到 90.1%。
与 Hanifin 和 Rajka 标准相比,新的 AD 标准版本是一种实用的诊断工具,似乎纠正了 Williams 标准敏感性低的问题。需要进行大型验证研究。