Doctoral Researcher, Social Sciences and Gerontology Research Centre, Tampere University , Tampere, Finland.
Doctoral Researcher, Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Faculty of Social Sciences, Bar-Ilan University , Ramat Gan, Israel.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jul-Oct;32(4-5):506-514. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1772002. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, we face an exacerbation of ageism as well as a flourish of intergenerational solidarity. The use of chronological age is an unjustified threshold for the creation of public policies to control the spreading of the virus; doing so reinforces intrapersonal and interpersonal negative age stereotypes and violates older persons' human rights to autonomy, proper care treatment, work, and equality. By overlooking differences within age groups, measures formulated solely on the basis of age are unable to target beneficiaries' needs. Concurrently, several initiatives are trying to overcome ageist practices by providing different types of assistance to older adults on the basis of need rather than chronological age. The Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Network EuroAgeism calls on policymakers to refrain from ageist practices and language, as they exacerbate our ability to meet the COVID-19 crisis and future emergencies.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,我们不仅面临着年龄歧视的加剧,也见证了代际团结的蓬勃发展。将年龄作为制定控制病毒传播的公共政策的不合理门槛,这不仅强化了人际间负面的年龄刻板印象,也侵犯了老年人的自主权、适当照顾、工作和平等的人权。由于忽视了年龄群体内部的差异,仅仅基于年龄制定的措施无法满足受益人的需求。与此同时,一些举措正试图通过根据需求而不是年龄向老年人提供不同类型的帮助来克服年龄歧视。玛丽·居里·斯科罗多夫斯卡-居里创新性培训网络 EuroAgeism 呼吁政策制定者避免年龄歧视的做法和言论,因为这会加剧我们应对 COVID-19 危机和未来紧急情况的能力。