Fiorese Brittany A, Beckman Emma M, Connick Mark J, Hunter Adam B, Tweedy Sean M
University of Queensland, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, Australia; Australian Institute of Sport, Australia.
University of Queensland, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, Australia.
J Sci Med Sport. 2020 Dec;23(12):1118-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 18.
Para athletes with brain impairment are affected by hypertonia, ataxia and athetosis, which adversely affect starting, sprinting and submaximal running. The aim was to identify and synthesise evidence from studies that have compared the biomechanics of runners with brain impairments (RBI) and non-disabled runners (NDR).
Systematic review.
Five journal databases were systematically searched from inception to March 2020. Included studies compared the biomechanics of RBI (aged>14 years) and NDR performing either block-starts, sprinting, or submaximal running.
Eight studies were included, analysing a total of 100 RBI (78M:22F; 18-38 years) diagnosed with either cerebral palsy (n=44) or traumatic brain injury (n=56). Studies analysed block-starts (n=3), overground sprinting (n=3) and submaximal running (n=2), and submaximal treadmill running (n=1). Horizontal velocity during starts, sprinting and self-selected submaximal speeds were lower in RBI. During sprinting and submaximal running, compared with NDR, RBI had shorter stride length, step length, and flight time, increased ground-contact time, increased cadence, and reduced ankle and hip range of motion. In submaximal running, RBI had decreased ankle-power generation at toe-off.
There is limited research and small sample sizes in this area. However, preliminary evidence suggests that RBI had lower sprint speeds and biomechanical characteristics typical of submaximal running speeds in NDR, including increased ground-contact times and reduced stride length, step length, and flight times. Meaningful interpretation of biomechanical findings in RBI is impeded by impairment variability (type, severity and distribution), and methods which permit valid, reliable impairment stratification in larger samples are required.
患有脑损伤的残疾运动员会受到张力亢进、共济失调和手足徐动症的影响,这些会对起跑、短跑和亚最大强度跑步产生不利影响。本研究旨在识别并综合比较患有脑损伤的跑步者(RBI)和非残疾跑步者(NDR)生物力学的研究证据。
系统评价。
对五个期刊数据库从建库至2020年3月进行系统检索。纳入的研究比较了年龄大于14岁的RBI和NDR在起跑、短跑或亚最大强度跑步时的生物力学。
纳入八项研究,共分析了100名被诊断为脑瘫(n = 44)或创伤性脑损伤(n = 56)的RBI(78名男性:22名女性;年龄18 - 38岁)。研究分析了起跑(n = 3)、室外短跑(n = 3)、亚最大强度跑步(n = 2)和亚最大强度跑步机跑步(n = 1)。RBI在起跑、短跑和自我选择的亚最大速度时的水平速度较低。在短跑和亚最大强度跑步时,与NDR相比,RBI的步幅、步长和腾空时间较短,着地时间增加,步频增加,踝关节和髋关节活动范围减小。在亚最大强度跑步时,RBI在脚趾离地时踝关节产生的功率降低。
该领域研究有限且样本量较小。然而,初步证据表明,RBI的短跑速度较低,具有NDR亚最大跑步速度时典型的生物力学特征,包括着地时间增加、步幅、步长和腾空时间减小。RBI生物力学研究结果的有意义解读受到损伤变异性(类型、严重程度和分布)的阻碍,需要能够在更大样本中进行有效、可靠损伤分层的方法。