Suppr超能文献

胸壁器官损伤分级(OIS)或简明损伤分级(AIS)能否预测结局?对 16000 例连续肋骨骨折的分析。

Does chest wall Organ Injury Scale (OIS) or Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) predict outcomes? An analysis of 16,000 consecutive rib fractures.

机构信息

Divisions of UCMC and WCH Trauma, Section of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, OH.

Divisions of UCMC and WCH Trauma, Section of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, OH.

出版信息

Surgery. 2020 Jul;168(1):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.04.032. Epub 2020 May 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chest wall injuries have serious clinical consequences. It is presumed a higher severity of injury correlates with worse outcomes. The 2 most common chest wall injury severity scores, the Organ Injury Scale and the Abbreviated Injury Scale, are based on expert opinion with unknown clinical endpoints. Our aim was to determine if either the Organ Injury Scale or the Abbreviated Injury Scale are associated with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A single institution, 4-year retrospective study of all patients with rib or sternal fractures was conducted. All patients were assessed for both Organ Injury Scale and Abbreviated Injury Scale scores. Outcomes assessed included mortality, complications, tracheostomy, and readmissions. Receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve were calculated to measure discriminatory accuracy of scoring systems for outcomes in chest wall injury.

RESULTS

Overall, 3,033 patients presented with a total of 16,055 rib fractures. The median chest wall scores were 2 for Organ Injury Scale and 3 for Abbreviated Injury Scale. Abbreviated Injury Scale scores for the same patients were greater than the Organ Injury Scale in 48.7%, equivalent in 46.7%, and lower in 4.6%. The receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve for in-hospital outcomes were weakly predictive for the Organ Injury Scale over the Abbreviated Injury Scale. The receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve for readmissions were very weakly predictive for the Abbreviated Injury Scale over the Organ Injury Scale.

CONCLUSION

There is a very weak association between chest wall Organ Injury Scale score and in-hospital outcomes. The Abbreviated Injury Scale score outperformed the Organ Injury Scale, only being weakly predictive of readmission. Chest wall injury scoring systems may need revision for future outcomes-based research and practice improvements.

摘要

背景

胸壁损伤具有严重的临床后果。据推测,损伤严重程度越高,预后越差。最常见的两种胸壁损伤严重程度评分,即器官损伤评分和简略损伤评分,均基于专家意见,而临床终点未知。我们的目的是确定器官损伤评分或简略损伤评分是否与临床结果相关。

方法

对所有肋骨或胸骨骨折患者进行了一项为期 4 年的单机构回顾性研究。所有患者均接受了器官损伤评分和简略损伤评分。评估的结果包括死亡率、并发症、气管切开术和再入院。计算了受试者工作特征曲线下面积,以衡量评分系统对胸壁损伤结果的判别准确性。

结果

总体而言,3033 名患者共发生 16055 处肋骨骨折。胸壁评分中位数为器官损伤评分 2 分,简略损伤评分 3 分。同一患者的简略损伤评分在 48.7%的情况下大于器官损伤评分,在 46.7%的情况下相等,在 4.6%的情况下小于器官损伤评分。住院期间结局的受试者工作特征曲线下面积对器官损伤评分的预测能力较弱。再入院的受试者工作特征曲线下面积对简略损伤评分的预测能力非常弱。

结论

胸壁器官损伤评分与住院期间结局之间存在非常弱的关联。简略损伤评分优于器官损伤评分,仅对再入院有微弱的预测作用。未来基于结果的研究和实践改进可能需要修订胸壁损伤评分系统。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验