• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跑鞋舒适评估工具(RUN-CAT):一种新的多项目评估工具的开发和评估,用于评估跑鞋的舒适度。

The running shoe comfort assessment tool (RUN-CAT): Development and evaluation of a new multi-item assessment tool for evaluating the comfort of running footwear.

机构信息

Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition & Activity (ARENA), Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia , Adelaide, Australia.

The Biomechanics Lab , Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2020 Sep;38(18):2100-2107. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1773613. Epub 2020 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1080/02640414.2020.1773613
PMID:32508250
Abstract

Comfort is important for running shoe prescription in athletes to enhance performance and potentially decrease injury risk. A three-stage process was used to develop a new running footwear comfort assessment tool (RUN-CAT): (i) a survey of 282 runners to identify meaningful items of comfort, (ii-a) field testing of 100 runners who assessed the comfort of different shoes, (ii-b) item reduction using bootstrap aggregation and weightings using multiple regressions to identify a final set of items, and (iii) defining test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable difference (MDD) and minimal important difference (MID) values for the final tool. Of the 19 initial items, after item reduction, four were included in the final tool: heel cushioning, shoe stability, forefoot cushioning and forefoot flexibility. Reliability of the overall comfort score was good to excellent (within-day ICC 0.88, between-day 0.70) with all four components displaying good reliability (ICC >0.70). The SEM of the comfort score was 2.8 points and the MDD was 6.5 mm. Subject nominated MID values ranged from 9.3 to 9.9 mm. The RUN-CAT demonstrates excellent reliability, acceptable measurement error and can discriminate between footwear models. Clinicians and researchers can incorporate the RUN-CAT to optimise running shoe comfort in athletes.

摘要

在运动员的跑鞋处方中,舒适度很重要,这可以提高表现并降低受伤风险。我们采用了一个三阶段的流程来开发一个新的跑鞋舒适度评估工具(RUN-CAT):(i)对 282 名跑步者进行调查,以确定舒适度相关的有意义项目;(ii-a)对 100 名跑步者进行实地测试,评估不同鞋子的舒适度;(ii-b)使用 bootstrap 聚合进行项目删减,并使用多元回归对权重进行加权,以确定最终的项目集;(iii)为最终工具定义测试-重测信度、测量误差标准(SEM)、最小可检测差异(MDD)和最小有意义差异(MID)值。在最初的 19 个项目中,经过项目删减后,最终工具中包含了四个项目:脚跟缓冲、鞋稳定性、前脚掌缓冲和前脚掌灵活性。整体舒适度评分的可靠性良好至优秀(日内 ICC 为 0.88,日间 ICC 为 0.70),所有四个组成部分的可靠性都很好(ICC > 0.70)。舒适度评分的 SEM 为 2.8 分,MDD 为 6.5 毫米。患者指定的 MID 值范围为 9.3 至 9.9 毫米。RUN-CAT 具有出色的可靠性、可接受的测量误差,并且可以区分不同的鞋款。临床医生和研究人员可以将 RUN-CAT 用于优化运动员的跑鞋舒适度。

相似文献

1
The running shoe comfort assessment tool (RUN-CAT): Development and evaluation of a new multi-item assessment tool for evaluating the comfort of running footwear.跑鞋舒适评估工具(RUN-CAT):一种新的多项目评估工具的开发和评估,用于评估跑鞋的舒适度。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Sep;38(18):2100-2107. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1773613. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
2
Shoe preference based on subjective comfort for walking and running.基于步行和跑步时主观舒适度的鞋子偏好。
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2010 Nov-Dec;100(6):456-62. doi: 10.7547/1000456.
3
[Grading of the functional sport shoe parameter "cushioning" and "forefoot flexibility" on running shoes].[跑鞋功能性运动鞋参数“缓冲”和“前脚掌灵活性”的分级]
Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2006 Mar;20(1):19-24. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-926640.
4
Overall Preference of Running Shoes Can Be Predicted by Suitable Perception Factors Using a Multiple Regression Model.使用多元回归模型,通过合适的感知因素可以预测跑鞋的总体偏好。
Hum Factors. 2017 May;59(3):432-441. doi: 10.1177/0018720816681147. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
5
Acute effect of engineered thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer knockoff running footwear on foot loading and comfort during heel-to-toe running.工程热塑性聚氨酯弹性体仿冒跑鞋对足跟到足尖跑步时足部负荷和舒适度的急性影响。
Gait Posture. 2020 Jun;79:111-116. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
6
CAN RUNNERS PERCEIVE CHANGES IN HEEL CUSHIONING AS THE SHOE AGES WITH INCREASED MILEAGE?随着鞋子因里程数增加而老化,跑步者能察觉到后跟缓冲的变化吗?
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Aug;12(4):616-624.
7
Shoe Cushioning Influences the Running Injury Risk According to Body Mass: A Randomized Controlled Trial Involving 848 Recreational Runners.根据体重,鞋的缓冲性能影响跑步受伤风险:一项涉及 848 名休闲跑者的随机对照试验。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):473-480. doi: 10.1177/0363546519892578. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
8
Biomechanical variables and perception of comfort in running shoes with different cushioning technologies.不同缓冲技术跑鞋的生物力学变量与舒适度感知
J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Jan;18(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.12.003. Epub 2014 Jan 1.
9
Use of pressure insoles to compare in-shoe loading for modern running shoes.使用压力鞋垫比较现代跑鞋的鞋内负荷情况。
Ergonomics. 2008 Oct;51(10):1503-14. doi: 10.1080/00140130802239562.
10
Running with a minimalist shoe increases plantar pressure in the forefoot region of healthy female runners.穿着极简主义跑鞋跑步会增加健康女性跑步者前脚掌区域的足底压力。
J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Jul;18(4):463-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of the Innovative Running Shoes With the Special Midsole Structure on the Female Runners' Lower Limb Biomechanics.具有特殊中底结构的创新型跑鞋对女性跑步者下肢生物力学的影响。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jun 6;10:866321. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.866321. eCollection 2022.
2
Factors Influencing Runner's Choices of Footwear.影响跑步者鞋类选择的因素。
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Mar 31;4:829514. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.829514. eCollection 2022.
3
Footwear comfort: a systematic search and narrative synthesis of the literature.
鞋类舒适度:文献的系统检索和叙述性综合。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2021 Dec 7;14(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13047-021-00500-9.
4
Comfort Evaluation of Wearable Functional Textiles.可穿戴功能性纺织品的舒适性评估
Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 28;14(21):6466. doi: 10.3390/ma14216466.