• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

摒弃剖宫产术中大量常规放置腹腔引流管的盲目传统做法。

Abandoning the blind legacy passed on horde of routine intra-abdominal drain insertion in cesarean section.

作者信息

Fram Kamil M, Saleh Shawqi, Thikerallah Fidaa, Fram Farah K, Fram Rand K, Darwish Tamara, Haddad Rana, Othman Zeina

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jordan University Hospital, Amman, Jordan.

出版信息

Prz Menopauzalny. 2020 Mar;19(1):25-29. doi: 10.5114/pm.2020.95332. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

DOI:10.5114/pm.2020.95332
PMID:32508553
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7258367/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cesarean section (CS) delivery is the most common major obstetrical surgical operation carried out in and is increasing in incidence throughout the world. The major involves some risks that might include: infection, coagulation problem, loss of blood, bowel or bladder injury, abnormalities of the placenta in subsequent pregnancies.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of postoperative CS intra-abdominal drain insertion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on 245 patients in labor, at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jordan University Hospital, between January 2017 and January 2018. Participants were divided into two groups: group I including those who had abdominal drains insertion during surgery and group II including women who had no abdominal drain inserted before closure. All patients on both groups were term pregnancies, underwent elective vs. emergency CS, and had no subcutaneous drains inserted.

RESULTS

Clinical and surgical parameters were comparable in both groups. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in group II, whereas specific postoperative complication rate was significantly higher in group I. Drain site infection was noted in 2 (1.6%), organ herniation in 2 (1.6%), drain avulsion in 2 (1.6%), severe pain at the site of insertion in 2 (1.6%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine prophylactic intra-abdominal drain insertion post CS has no benefits and therefore should be stopped.

摘要

引言

剖宫产是全球范围内最常见的重大产科外科手术,且其发生率正在上升。主要风险可能包括:感染、凝血问题、失血、肠道或膀胱损伤、后续妊娠时胎盘异常。

研究目的

评估剖宫产术后腹腔引流管置入的临床效果。

材料与方法

2017年1月至2018年1月期间,在约旦大学医院妇产科对245例分娩患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。参与者分为两组:第一组包括手术期间置入腹腔引流管的患者,第二组包括缝合前未置入腹腔引流管的女性。两组所有患者均为足月妊娠,接受择期或急诊剖宫产,且未置入皮下引流管。

结果

两组的临床和手术参数具有可比性。第二组术后住院时间显著缩短,而第一组术后特定并发症发生率显著更高。2例(1.6%)出现引流部位感染,2例(1.6%)出现器官疝,2例(1.6%)出现引流管撕脱,2例(1.6%)患者在置入部位出现剧痛。

结论

剖宫产术后常规预防性置入腹腔引流管并无益处,因此应停止。

相似文献

1
Abandoning the blind legacy passed on horde of routine intra-abdominal drain insertion in cesarean section.摒弃剖宫产术中大量常规放置腹腔引流管的盲目传统做法。
Prz Menopauzalny. 2020 Mar;19(1):25-29. doi: 10.5114/pm.2020.95332. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
2
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术的预防性腹腔引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 21;10(10):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub3.
3
Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients.早期拔除预防性引流管可降低胰头切除患者腹腔内感染风险:对104例连续患者的前瞻性研究
Ann Surg. 2006 Jul;244(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000218077.14035.a6.
4
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术的预防性腹腔引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 21(8):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub2.
5
A prospective, non-randomized study to determine the role of intraperitoneal drain placement in perforation peritonitis.一项前瞻性、非随机研究,旨在确定腹腔引流在穿孔性腹膜炎中的作用。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Oct;28(10):1397-1403. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.45705.
6
Extra-abdominal removal of placenta during cesarean section: a prospective randomized controlled trial of a novel technique.剖宫产术中胎盘腹腔外取出:一项新技术的前瞻性随机对照试验
J Perinat Med. 2016 Jul 1;44(5):557-65. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2015-0330.
7
A Comparative Study of the Spontaneous Labor Rate in Scheduled Elective Cesarean Section at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks of Gestation in Parturient with Previous Cesarean Section.既往有剖宫产史的产妇在妊娠38周与39周择期剖宫产时自然分娩率的比较研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Jul;99 Suppl 4:S37-41.
8
Significance of prophylactic intra-abdominal drain placement after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术后预防性腹腔引流管放置的意义
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 May 12;13:181. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0591-9.
9
Role of abdominal drains in perforated duodenal ulcer patients: a prospective controlled study.腹腔引流管在十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者中的作用:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Aust N Z J Surg. 1999 Mar;69(3):210-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01524.x.
10
Post-operative abdominal drainage following major upper gastrointestinal surgery: single drain versus two drains.上消化道大手术后的腹部引流:单根引流管与两根引流管的比较
J Cancer Res Ther. 2013 Apr-Jun;9(2):267-71. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.113380.

本文引用的文献

1
To drain or not to drain: intraperitoneal closed-suction drainage placement during cesarean delivery.是否放置腹腔内闭式引流管:剖宫产术中的应用。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Sep;34(18):3021-3028. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1677591. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
2
Post-Caesarean Drain Placement - Minor Procedure Leading to Major Complication.剖宫产术后引流管放置——小手术引发大并发症
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jan;11(1):QD03-QD04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22505.9139. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
3
Wound drainage for caesarean section.剖宫产术的伤口引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 13;2013(12):CD004549. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004549.pub3.
4
Drain site evisceration of fallopian tube, another reason to discourage abdominal drain: report of a case and brief review of literature.
Trop Doct. 2012 Apr;42(2):122-4. doi: 10.1258/td.2011.110413.
5
To drain or not to drain? The role of drainage in the contaminated and infected abdomen: an international and personal perspective.引流还是不引流?引流在污染和感染性腹腔中的作用:国际视角与个人观点
World J Surg. 2008 Feb;32(2):312-21. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9277-y.
6
Evidence forward, drainage on retreat: still we ignore and drain!?证据在前,退缩时引流:我们仍要忽视并引流吗?
Ann Surg. 2006 Jul;244(1):8-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000225046.43968.eb.
7
A bacteriologic study comparing closed suction and simple conduit drainage.一项比较封闭式吸引与单纯导管引流的细菌学研究。
Am J Surg. 1984 Nov;148(5):618-20. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90336-2.
8
Prophylactic abdominal drains.预防性腹腔引流管。
Arch Surg. 1972 Aug;105(2):173-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1972.04180080027005.
9
A controlled trial on wound drainage in caesarean section.剖宫产伤口引流的对照试验。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 Nov;28(4):266-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1988.tb01679.x.
10
Closed suction wound drainage and lower-segment caesarean section.闭式吸引伤口引流与下段剖宫产术
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 Oct;95(10):1060-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06514.x.