Walton Chaska C, Begelman David, Nguyen Wynnie, Andersen Julie K
Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA, United States.
Front Cell Neurosci. 2020 May 19;14:129. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.00129. eCollection 2020.
Due to their postmitotic status, the potential for neurons to undergo senescence has historically received little attention. This lack of attention has extended to some non-postmitotic cells as well. Recently, the study of senescence within the central nervous system (CNS) has begun to emerge as a new etiological framework for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). The presence of senescent cells is known to be deleterious to non-senescent neighboring cells via development of a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) which includes the release of inflammatory, oxidative, mitogenic, and matrix-degrading factors. Senescence and the SASP have recently been hailed as an alternative to the amyloid cascade hypothesis and the selective killing of senescence cells by senolytic drugs as a substitute for amyloid beta (Aß) targeting antibodies. Here we call for caution in rejecting the amyloid cascade hypothesis and to the dismissal of Aß antibody intervention at least in early disease stages, as Aß oligomers (AßO), and cellular senescence may be inextricably linked. We will review literature that portrays AßO as a stressor capable of inducing senescence. We will discuss research on the potential role of secondary senescence, a process by which senescent cells induce senescence in neighboring cells, in disease progression. Once this seed of senescent cells is present, the elimination of senescence-inducing stressors like Aß would likely be ineffective in abrogating the spread of senescence. This has potential implications for when and why AßO clearance may or may not be effective as a therapeutic for AD. The selective killing of senescent cells by the immune system via immune surveillance naturally curtails the SASP and secondary senescence outside the CNS. Immune privilege restricts the access of peripheral immune cells to the brain parenchyma, making the brain a safe harbor for the spread of senescence and the SASP. However, an increasingly leaky blood brain barrier (BBB) compromises immune privilege in aging AD patients, potentially enabling immune infiltration that could have detrimental consequences in later AD stages. Rather than an alternative etiology, senescence itself may constitute an essential component of the cascade in the amyloid cascade hypothesis.
由于神经元的终末有丝分裂状态,其发生衰老的可能性在历史上很少受到关注。这种关注的缺乏也延伸到了一些非终末有丝分裂细胞。最近,中枢神经系统(CNS)内衰老的研究已开始成为诸如阿尔茨海默病(AD)和帕金森病(PD)等神经退行性疾病的一种新的病因框架。已知衰老细胞的存在会通过形成衰老相关分泌表型(SASP)对非衰老的邻近细胞有害,SASP包括释放炎症、氧化、促有丝分裂和基质降解因子。衰老和SASP最近被誉为淀粉样蛋白级联假说的替代方案,以及衰老细胞溶解药物选择性杀伤衰老细胞以替代淀粉样β(Aβ)靶向抗体。在此,我们呼吁谨慎对待摒弃淀粉样蛋白级联假说以及至少在疾病早期阶段摒弃Aβ抗体干预的做法,因为Aβ寡聚体(AβO)与细胞衰老可能紧密相连。我们将回顾把AβO描绘成能够诱导衰老的应激源的文献。我们将讨论关于继发性衰老(衰老细胞诱导邻近细胞衰老的过程)在疾病进展中的潜在作用的研究。一旦存在衰老细胞的这个种子,消除诸如Aβ等诱导衰老的应激源可能在消除衰老传播方面无效。这对于AβO清除作为AD治疗方法何时以及为何可能有效或无效具有潜在意义。免疫系统通过免疫监视对衰老细胞的选择性杀伤自然会抑制CNS外的SASP和继发性衰老。免疫豁免限制了外周免疫细胞进入脑实质,使大脑成为衰老和SASP传播的安全港。然而,血脑屏障(BBB)日益渗漏会损害衰老AD患者的免疫豁免,可能使免疫细胞浸润,这在AD后期可能产生有害后果。衰老本身可能并非替代病因,而是淀粉样蛋白级联假说中级联反应的一个重要组成部分。