Blackwell Jennifer, Miksza Peter, Evans Paul, McPherson Gary E
Music Department, University of Hawai'i at Ma¯noa, Honolulu, HI, United States.
Jacobs School of Music, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Front Psychol. 2020 May 21;11:1007. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01007. eCollection 2020.
Vitality is the feeling of being alive, vigorous, and energetic, and is an important indicator of overall motivation and wellbeing. Studio music instruction holds rich potential for creating feelings of vitality through close relationships, the potential for developing skills, and a shared endeavor of artistic expression. But they also have the potential to deplete vitality - through controlling teaching, a poor quality relationship, or harsh criticism from the teacher. The purpose of this study was to investigate relationships among student and teacher behavior, rapport, and students' experiences of subjective vitality in the context of university-level applied performance lessons. Participants were six undergraduate instrumental music majors and their teachers located at universities in the United States and Australia, who were selected because they provided the highest (three participants) and lowest (three participants) scores on a measure of subjective vitality completed immediately following a studio music lesson. A lesson was recorded for each student-teacher participant pair, coded for the frequencies of 35 lesson behaviors, described with a qualitative contextual commentary, and rated for evidence of rapport and physical proximity. Clear differences emerged between the high and low vitality lessons with regard to questioning, feedback, modeling, student performance, and student talk. Teachers of high vitality students spent most or all of the lesson within close proximity to their student, and showed stronger rapport than teachers of low vitality students. The findings suggest that students' vitality may depend on important differences in styles of teacher-student engagement and the quality of student-teacher relationships.
活力是一种活着、精力充沛和充满能量的感觉,是整体动力和幸福感的重要指标。工作室音乐教学通过亲密关系、技能发展潜力以及艺术表达的共同努力,具有创造活力感的丰富潜力。但它们也有可能消耗活力——通过控制教学、不良的师生关系或教师的严厉批评。本研究的目的是调查在大学水平的应用表演课程背景下,学生和教师行为、融洽关系以及学生主观活力体验之间的关系。参与者是六名美国和澳大利亚大学的本科器乐专业学生及其教师,他们被选中是因为在一堂工作室音乐课后立即完成的主观活力测量中,他们分别提供了最高(三名参与者)和最低(三名参与者)的分数。为每对学生-教师参与者录制了一堂课,对35种课堂行为的频率进行编码,用定性的背景评论进行描述,并对融洽关系和身体距离的证据进行评分。在提问、反馈、示范、学生表现和学生发言方面,高活力课程和低活力课程之间出现了明显差异。高活力学生的教师在课堂上大部分或全部时间都与学生保持近距离,并且比低活力学生的教师表现出更强的融洽关系。研究结果表明,学生的活力可能取决于师生互动方式的重要差异以及师生关系的质量。