• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Student Vitality, Teacher Engagement, and Rapport in Studio Music Instruction.音乐工作室教学中的学生活力、教师参与度与融洽关系
Front Psychol. 2020 May 21;11:1007. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01007. eCollection 2020.
2
Toward the Positive Consequences of Teacher-Student Rapport for Students' Academic Engagement in the Practical Instruction Classrooms.论师生融洽关系对学生在实践教学课堂中学业投入的积极影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 5;12:759785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759785. eCollection 2021.
3
Enhancing Chinese students' academic engagement: the effect of teacher support and teacher-student rapport.提高中国学生的学业参与度:教师支持与师生融洽关系的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 15;14:1188507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1188507. eCollection 2023.
4
Physical education in secondary schools located in low-income communities: Physical activity levels, lesson context and teacher interaction.位于低收入社区的中学体育教育:身体活动水平、课程背景与教师互动
J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Feb;19(2):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
5
Influence of motivation, self-efficacy and situational factors on the teaching quality of clinical educators.动机、自我效能感和情境因素对临床教育工作者教学质量的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 May 8;17(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0923-2.
6
Positive Instruction in Music Studios: Introducing a New Model for Teaching Studio Music in Schools Based upon Positive Psychology.音乐工作室中的积极指导:基于积极心理学引入一种学校工作室音乐教学的新模式。
Psychol Well Being. 2015;5(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13612-015-0036-9. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
Fostering EFL/ESL Students' State Motivation: The Role of Teacher-Student Rapport.培养外语/英语作为第二语言学生的状态动机:师生融洽关系的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 13;12:754797. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754797. eCollection 2021.
8
Online Involvement for Georgia Student Teachers During Covid-19.新冠疫情期间佐治亚州实习教师的线上参与情况
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 3;12:648028. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648028. eCollection 2021.
9
Do student self-efficacy and teacher-student interaction quality contribute to emotional and social engagement in fifth grade math?学生的自我效能感和师生互动质量是否有助于五年级学生在数学学习中的情感投入和社交参与?
J Sch Psychol. 2015 Oct;53(5):359-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
10
A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study of UK higher education teacher experiences when building rapport with international students online.一项关于英国高等教育教师在网上与国际学生建立融洽关系时的经历的顺序解释性混合方法研究。
SN Soc Sci. 2022;2(10):214. doi: 10.1007/s43545-022-00533-2. Epub 2022 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
University support and online learning engagement during the Covid-19 period: The role of student vitality.新冠疫情期间的大学支持与在线学习参与度:学生活力的作用。
Heliyon. 2023 Jan;9(1):e12832. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12832. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
2
Music students' workload, stress, and coping in higher education: Evidence-based policymaking.音乐专业学生在高等教育中的工作量、压力与应对:基于证据的政策制定。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 15;13:846666. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.846666. eCollection 2022.
3
Feedback in Music Performance Teaching.音乐表演教学中的反馈
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 20;13:891025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.891025. eCollection 2022.
4
Multiple Factors Influencing Healthy Performance for Pre-professional and Professional Classical Violinists: An Exploratory Study Focusing on Physical Health.影响准专业和专业古典小提琴家健康表现的多种因素:一项聚焦身体健康的探索性研究
Front Psychol. 2022 May 23;13:791339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.791339. eCollection 2022.
5
A Study of Disposition, Engagement, Efficacy, and Vitality of Teachers in Designing Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education.教师在设计科学、技术、工程和数学教育中的倾向、参与度、效能和活力研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 24;12:661631. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661631. eCollection 2021.
6
Adaptation and destabilization of interpersonal relationships in sport and music during the Covid-19 lockdown.新冠疫情封锁期间体育和音乐领域人际关系的适应与不稳定
Heliyon. 2020 Oct;6(10):e05212. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05212. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Instrumental Technique, Expressivity, and Communication. A Qualitative Study on Learning Music in Individual and Collective Settings.器乐技巧、表现力与交流。关于在个人和集体环境中学习音乐的定性研究。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 3;10:737. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00737. eCollection 2019.
2
The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures.《多伦多共情问卷:多种共情测量方法的量表编制及因子分析解决方案的初步验证》
J Pers Assess. 2009 Jan;91(1):62-71. doi: 10.1080/00223890802484381.
3
The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning.在预测自我调节学习中,感知到的自主支持与结构之间的协同关系。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2009 Mar;79(Pt 1):57-68. doi: 10.1348/000709908X304398. Epub 2008 May 8.
4
On the benefits of giving as well as receiving autonomy support: mutuality in close friendships.关于给予和接受自主支持的益处:亲密友谊中的相互性。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Mar;32(3):313-27. doi: 10.1177/0146167205282148.
5
Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork.选择固然不错,但关联性更佳:促进与抑制自主性的教师行为对学生学业投入的预测作用
Br J Educ Psychol. 2002 Jun;72(Pt 2):261-78. doi: 10.1348/000709902158883.
6
On energy, personality, and health: subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being.论能量、个性与健康:主观活力作为幸福感的动态反映
J Pers. 1997 Sep;65(3):529-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x.

音乐工作室教学中的学生活力、教师参与度与融洽关系

Student Vitality, Teacher Engagement, and Rapport in Studio Music Instruction.

作者信息

Blackwell Jennifer, Miksza Peter, Evans Paul, McPherson Gary E

机构信息

Music Department, University of Hawai'i at Ma¯noa, Honolulu, HI, United States.

Jacobs School of Music, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 May 21;11:1007. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01007. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01007
PMID:32508726
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7253673/
Abstract

Vitality is the feeling of being alive, vigorous, and energetic, and is an important indicator of overall motivation and wellbeing. Studio music instruction holds rich potential for creating feelings of vitality through close relationships, the potential for developing skills, and a shared endeavor of artistic expression. But they also have the potential to deplete vitality - through controlling teaching, a poor quality relationship, or harsh criticism from the teacher. The purpose of this study was to investigate relationships among student and teacher behavior, rapport, and students' experiences of subjective vitality in the context of university-level applied performance lessons. Participants were six undergraduate instrumental music majors and their teachers located at universities in the United States and Australia, who were selected because they provided the highest (three participants) and lowest (three participants) scores on a measure of subjective vitality completed immediately following a studio music lesson. A lesson was recorded for each student-teacher participant pair, coded for the frequencies of 35 lesson behaviors, described with a qualitative contextual commentary, and rated for evidence of rapport and physical proximity. Clear differences emerged between the high and low vitality lessons with regard to questioning, feedback, modeling, student performance, and student talk. Teachers of high vitality students spent most or all of the lesson within close proximity to their student, and showed stronger rapport than teachers of low vitality students. The findings suggest that students' vitality may depend on important differences in styles of teacher-student engagement and the quality of student-teacher relationships.

摘要

活力是一种活着、精力充沛和充满能量的感觉,是整体动力和幸福感的重要指标。工作室音乐教学通过亲密关系、技能发展潜力以及艺术表达的共同努力,具有创造活力感的丰富潜力。但它们也有可能消耗活力——通过控制教学、不良的师生关系或教师的严厉批评。本研究的目的是调查在大学水平的应用表演课程背景下,学生和教师行为、融洽关系以及学生主观活力体验之间的关系。参与者是六名美国和澳大利亚大学的本科器乐专业学生及其教师,他们被选中是因为在一堂工作室音乐课后立即完成的主观活力测量中,他们分别提供了最高(三名参与者)和最低(三名参与者)的分数。为每对学生-教师参与者录制了一堂课,对35种课堂行为的频率进行编码,用定性的背景评论进行描述,并对融洽关系和身体距离的证据进行评分。在提问、反馈、示范、学生表现和学生发言方面,高活力课程和低活力课程之间出现了明显差异。高活力学生的教师在课堂上大部分或全部时间都与学生保持近距离,并且比低活力学生的教师表现出更强的融洽关系。研究结果表明,学生的活力可能取决于师生互动方式的重要差异以及师生关系的质量。