Kwak Bong Jun, Choi Ho Joong, You Young Kyoung, Kim Dong Goo, Hong Tae Ho
Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020 Jun;9(3):284-295. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.04.18.
The difference in volume change in a pancreatic remnant according to the type of pancreaticoenterostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for long-term follow-up is unknown. Also, there are few studies that evaluate the difference in general nutritional status and pancreatic endocrine function, including new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) depending on the type of pancreaticoenterostomy. This study aimed to compare serial pancreatic volume changes in pancreatic remnants between pancreatogastrostomy (PG) and pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) after PD and to evaluate the difference in general nutritional status and incidence of NODM between PG and PJ.
This study enrolled 115 patients who had survived for more than 3 years after PD. They were divided into the PG group and the PJ group. Their clinicopathologic factors were collected and analyzed. We calculated serial pancreas volume and pancreatic duct size precisely from preoperative stage to 5 years after surgery by image-processing software specifically designed for navigation and visualization of multimodality and multidimensional images. Consecutive changes of albumin and body mass index (BMI) as related to general nutritional status were compared between the PG and PJ groups. To evaluate the incidence and risk factors of NODM following PD, subgroup analysis was performed in 88 patients who did not have diabetes preoperatively.
Most patient demographics were not significantly different between the PG group (n=45) and PJ group (n=70). There was no significant difference in volume reduction between the groups from postoperative 1 month to 5 years (PG group -18.21±14.66 mL versus PJ group -14.43±13.05 mL, P=0.209). But there was a significant difference in increased pancreatic duct size between the groups from postoperative 1 month to 5 years (PG group 1.66±2.20 mm versus PJ group 0.54±1.54 mm, P=0.007). There was no significant difference in the increase of total serum albumin between the groups for 5 years after surgery (PG group 0.51±0.47 g/dL, 14.3% versus PJ group 0.42±0.60 g/dL, 11.3%, P=0.437). There was also no significant difference in BMI decrease between the groups (PG group -1.13±3.12, -4.9% versus PJ group -1.97±2.01, -8.7%, P=0.206). On the whole, NODM was diagnosed in 19 patients out of the 88 patients (21.6%) who did not have DM preoperatively. The incidence of NODM was not significantly different between the groups (PG group 21.6% versus PJ group 21.5%, P=0.995). In addition, pancreaticoenterostomy was not an independent risk factor for NODM by logistic regression analysis (odds ratio, 0.997, 95% CI: 0.356-0.2.788, P=0.995). No other risk factors for NODM were found.
PG and PJ following PD induced similar pancreatic volume reduction during long-term follow-up. There was no difference in general nutritional status or incidence of NODM between the groups after PD.
胰十二指肠切除术(PD)后,长期随访中胰残端体积变化因胰肠吻合术类型而异尚不清楚。此外,很少有研究评估胰肠吻合术类型对一般营养状况和胰腺内分泌功能(包括新发糖尿病(NODM))的影响。本研究旨在比较PD后胰胃吻合术(PG)和胰空肠吻合术(PJ)之间胰残端的系列胰腺体积变化,并评估PG和PJ之间一般营养状况和NODM发生率的差异。
本研究纳入了115例PD术后存活超过3年的患者。他们被分为PG组和PJ组。收集并分析他们的临床病理因素。我们通过专门设计用于多模态和多维图像导航与可视化的图像处理软件,精确计算从术前到术后5年的系列胰腺体积和胰管大小。比较PG组和PJ组之间与一般营养状况相关的白蛋白和体重指数(BMI)的连续变化。为了评估PD后NODM的发生率和危险因素,对88例术前无糖尿病的患者进行了亚组分析。
PG组(n = 45)和PJ组(n = 70)之间的大多数患者人口统计学特征无显著差异。术后1个月至5年,两组之间的体积缩小无显著差异(PG组 -18.21±14.66 mL对PJ组 -14.43±13.05 mL,P = 0.209)。但术后1个月至5年,两组之间胰管大小增加有显著差异(PG组1.66±2.20 mm对PJ组0.54±1.54 mm,P = 0.007)。术后5年,两组之间总血清白蛋白增加无显著差异(PG组0.51±0.47 g/dL,14.3%对PJ组0.42±0.60 g/dL,11.3%,P = 0.437)。两组之间BMI下降也无显著差异(PG组 -1.13±3.12,-4.9%对PJ组 -1.97±2.01,-8.7%,P = 0.206)。总体而言,88例术前无糖尿病的患者中有19例(21.6%)被诊断为NODM。两组之间NODM的发生率无显著差异(PG组21.6%对PJ组21.5%,P = 0.995)。此外,通过逻辑回归分析,胰肠吻合术不是NODM的独立危险因素(比值比,0.997,95%CI:0.356 - 0.2788,P = 0.995)。未发现其他NODM危险因素。
PD后的PG和PJ在长期随访中导致相似的胰腺体积缩小。PD后两组之间的一般营养状况或NODM发生率无差异。