Svirsky Mario A, Neuman Arlene C, Neukam Jonathan D, Lavender Annette, Miller Margaret K, Aaron Ksenia A, Skarzynski Piotr H, Cywka Katarzyna B, Skarzynski Henryk, Truy Eric, Seldran Fabien, Hermann Ruben, Govaerts Paul, De Ceulaer Geert, Bergeron Francois, Hotton Matthieu, Moran Michelle, Dowell Richard C, Goffi-Gomez Maria Valeria Schmidt, Magalhães Ana Tereza de Matos, Santarelli Rosamaria, Scimemi Pietro
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Neuroscience Institute, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA.
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 5;9(6):1758. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061758.
In recent years there has been an increasing percentage of cochlear implant (CI) users who have usable residual hearing in the contralateral, nonimplanted ear, typically aided by acoustic amplification. This raises the issue of the extent to which the signal presented through the cochlear implant may influence how listeners process information in the acoustically stimulated ear. This multicenter retrospective study examined pre- to postoperative changes in speech perception in the nonimplanted ear, the implanted ear, and both together. Results in the latter two conditions showed the expected increases, but speech perception in the nonimplanted ear showed a modest yet meaningful decrease that could not be completely explained by changes in unaided thresholds, hearing aid malfunction, or several other demographic variables. Decreases in speech perception in the nonimplanted ear were more likely in individuals who had better levels of speech perception in the implanted ear, and in those who had better speech perception in the implanted than in the nonimplanted ear. This raises the possibility that, in some cases, bimodal listeners may rely on the higher quality signal provided by the implant and may disregard or even neglect the input provided by the nonimplanted ear.
近年来,越来越多的人工耳蜗(CI)使用者在对侧未植入的耳朵中拥有可用的残余听力,通常借助声学放大设备。这就引发了一个问题,即通过人工耳蜗呈现的信号在多大程度上可能会影响听众对声学刺激耳朵中信息的处理方式。这项多中心回顾性研究考察了未植入耳朵、植入耳朵以及两者综合起来从术前到术后言语感知的变化。后两种情况下的结果显示出预期的提升,但未植入耳朵的言语感知却出现了适度但有意义的下降,这无法完全用未佩戴助听器时的阈值变化、助听器故障或其他几个人口统计学变量来解释。未植入耳朵的言语感知下降在植入耳朵中言语感知水平较好的个体中更有可能出现,以及在植入耳朵的言语感知比未植入耳朵更好的个体中更有可能出现。这就提出了一种可能性,即在某些情况下,双模式听力者可能会依赖植入设备提供的更高质量信号,并且可能会忽略甚至忽视未植入耳朵提供的输入。