• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验室检测的趋势及医生之间的差异:一项全科医疗的回顾性纵向研究

Trends and Between-Physician Variation in Laboratory Testing: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study in General Practice.

作者信息

Schumacher Lisa D, Jäger Levy, Meier Rahel, Rachamin Yael, Senn Oliver, Rosemann Thomas, Markun Stefan

机构信息

Institute of Primary Care, University and University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 8;9(6):1787. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061787.

DOI:10.3390/jcm9061787
PMID:32521786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7355885/
Abstract

Laboratory tests are frequently ordered by general practitioners (GPs), but little is known about time trends and between-GP variation of their use. In this retrospective longitudinal study, we analyzed over six million consultations by Swiss GPs during the decade 2009-2018. For 15 commonly used test types, we defined specific laboratory testing rates (sLTR) as the percentage of consultations involving corresponding laboratory testing requests. Patient age- and sex-adjusted time trends of sLTR were modeled with mixed-effect logistic regression accounting for clustering of patients within GPs. We quantified between-GP variation by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Nine out of the 15 laboratory test types considered showed significant temporal increases, most eminently vitamin D (ten-year odds ratio (OR) 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.71-2.06) and glycated hemoglobin (ten-year OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.82-1.92). Test types both subject to substantial increase and high between-GP variation of sLTR were vitamin D (ICC 0.075), glycated hemoglobin (ICC 0.101), C-reactive protein (ICC 0.202), and vitamin B12 (ICC 0.166). Increasing testing frequencies and large between-GP variation of specific test type use pointed at inconsistencies of medical practice and potential overuse.

摘要

全科医生(GP)经常会安排实验室检查,但对于其使用的时间趋势以及全科医生之间的差异却知之甚少。在这项回顾性纵向研究中,我们分析了瑞士全科医生在2009年至2018年这十年间的六百多万例会诊。对于15种常用的检查类型,我们将特定实验室检查率(sLTR)定义为涉及相应实验室检查请求的会诊百分比。采用混合效应逻辑回归模型对患者年龄和性别调整后的sLTR时间趋势进行建模,该模型考虑了全科医生内部患者的聚类情况。我们通过组内相关系数(ICC)对全科医生之间的差异进行了量化。所考虑的15种实验室检查类型中有9种显示出显著的时间增加趋势,最明显的是维生素D(十年优势比(OR)为1.88,95%置信区间(CI)为1.71 - 2.06)和糖化血红蛋白(十年OR为1.87,95%CI为1.82 - 1.92)。sLTR既出现大幅增加又存在较高全科医生之间差异的检查类型有维生素D(ICC为0.075)、糖化血红蛋白(ICC为0.101)、C反应蛋白(ICC为0.202)和维生素B12(ICC为0.166)。特定检查类型使用频率的增加以及全科医生之间的巨大差异表明医疗实践存在不一致性以及可能存在过度使用的情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f19/7355885/6ab533afba1b/jcm-09-01787-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f19/7355885/20c99415ec65/jcm-09-01787-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f19/7355885/1fceefa8d159/jcm-09-01787-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f19/7355885/5e2fbd93cbc0/jcm-09-01787-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f19/7355885/6ab533afba1b/jcm-09-01787-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f19/7355885/20c99415ec65/jcm-09-01787-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f19/7355885/1fceefa8d159/jcm-09-01787-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f19/7355885/5e2fbd93cbc0/jcm-09-01787-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f19/7355885/6ab533afba1b/jcm-09-01787-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends and Between-Physician Variation in Laboratory Testing: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study in General Practice.实验室检测的趋势及医生之间的差异:一项全科医疗的回顾性纵向研究
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 8;9(6):1787. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061787.
2
Physician and practice characteristics associated with immunoglobulin test ordering.与免疫球蛋白检测医嘱相关的医生及执业特征。
Fam Pract. 2018 Jan 16;35(1):41-46. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx063.
3
Empathy Variation in General Practice: A Survey among General Practitioners in Denmark.全科医学中的同理心差异:丹麦全科医生调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 2;15(3):433. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030433.
4
Redundant laboratory testing on referral from general practice to the outpatient clinic: a post-hoc analysis.从全科医疗转诊至门诊时的重复实验室检查:一项事后分析。
BJGP Open. 2022 Mar 22;6(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0134. Print 2022 Mar.
5
General practitioners' consultation counts and associated factors in Swiss primary care - A retrospective observational study.瑞士初级保健中全科医生的就诊次数及相关因素——一项回顾性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 31;14(12):e0227280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227280. eCollection 2019.
6
7
Microbiological point of care testing before antibiotic prescribing in primary care: considerable variations between practices.基层医疗中抗生素处方前的微生物即时检测:不同医疗机构之间存在显著差异。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Jan 26;18(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0576-y.
8
Practice variation in surgical procedures and IUD-insertions among general practitioners in Norway - a longitudinal study.挪威全科医生手术操作及宫内节育器放置的实践差异——一项纵向研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Jan 21;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0581-9.
9
Test ordering in an evidence free zone: Rates and associations of Australian general practice trainees' vitamin D test ordering.在缺乏证据的情况下进行检测:澳大利亚全科医学实习生开具维生素D检测的比率及相关性
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Dec;21(6):1151-6. doi: 10.1111/jep.12322. Epub 2015 May 25.
10
Workload impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework for patients with diabetes: an interrupted time series in general practice.工作量对糖尿病患者质量和结果框架的影响:一般实践中的中断时间序列。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Aug;69(685):e570-e577. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704645. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Ferritin Cutoffs and Diagnosis of Iron Deficiency in Primary Care.铁蛋白 cutoff 值与初级保健中铁缺乏症的诊断。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2425692. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25692.
2
The Copenhagen Primary Care Laboratory (CopLab) Database.哥本哈根初级保健实验室(CopLab)数据库。
Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Mar 1;16:155-163. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S437123. eCollection 2024.
3
Ambient temperature and kidney function in primary care patients.环境温度与基层医疗患者的肾功能。

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence and psychopathology of vegetarians and vegans - Results from a representative survey in Germany.素食主义者和纯素食主义者的流行率和精神病理学 - 来自德国代表性调查的结果。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 22;10(1):6840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63910-y.
2
General practitioners' consultation counts and associated factors in Swiss primary care - A retrospective observational study.瑞士初级保健中全科医生的就诊次数及相关因素——一项回顾性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 31;14(12):e0227280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227280. eCollection 2019.
3
Cascades of Care After Incidental Findings in a US National Survey of Physicians.
J Nephrol. 2024 Jan;37(1):95-105. doi: 10.1007/s40620-023-01715-8. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
4
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Classification of Thyroid Nodules: An Update.人工智能在甲状腺结节诊断与分类中的应用:最新进展
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;15(3):708. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030708.
5
The Role of Point-of-Care C-Reactive Protein Testing in Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Tract Infections: A Survey among Swiss General Practitioners.即时检测C反应蛋白在呼吸道感染抗生素处方中的作用:瑞士全科医生调查
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Apr 19;11(5):543. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11050543.
6
Vitamin D Metabolites: Analytical Challenges and Clinical Relevance.维生素 D 代谢物:分析挑战与临床相关性。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2023 Feb;112(2):158-177. doi: 10.1007/s00223-022-00961-5. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
7
Prescription Rates, Polypharmacy and Prescriber Variability in Swiss General Practice-A Cross-Sectional Database Study.瑞士全科医疗中的处方率、多药联用及开处方者的变异性——一项横断面数据库研究
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Feb 14;13:832994. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.832994. eCollection 2022.
8
Testing and Prescribing Vitamin B12 in Swiss General Practice: A Survey among Physicians.瑞士全科医学中维生素 B12 的检测与处方:医师调查。
Nutrients. 2021 Jul 29;13(8):2610. doi: 10.3390/nu13082610.
9
Deep into Laboratory: An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Recommend Laboratory Tests.深入实验室:一种用于推荐实验室检查的人工智能方法
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 29;11(6):990. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11060990.
10
Trends in Micronutrient Laboratory Testing in Switzerland: A 7-Year Retrospective Analysis of Healthcare Claims Data.瑞士微量营养素实验室检测趋势:对医疗保健理赔数据的7年回顾性分析。
Int J Gen Med. 2020 Dec 2;13:1341-1348. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S275406. eCollection 2020.
美国全国医师调查中偶然发现的后续医疗处理。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1913325. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13325.
4
Evaluating practice variance among family physicians to identify targets for laboratory utilization management.评估家庭医生的实践差异,以确定实验室利用管理的目标。
Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Oct;497:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.06.017. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
5
Practice variation in the use of tests in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 16 million tests performed over 3.3 million patient years in 2015/16.英国初级保健中检测使用的实践差异:2015/16 年对 330 万患者就诊年中进行的 1600 万次检测的回顾性分析。
BMC Med. 2018 Dec 20;16(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1217-1.
6
Temporal trends in use of tests in UK primary care, 2000-15: retrospective analysis of 250 million tests.英国初级保健中检测的使用趋势,2000-15 年:2.5 亿次检测的回顾性分析。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4666. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4666.
7
Increased rates of 25-hydroxy vitamin D testing: Dissecting a modern epidemic.25-羟维生素D检测率上升:剖析一种现代流行病。
Clin Biochem. 2018 Sep;59:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
8
Vitamin D: too much testing and treating?维生素 D:检测和治疗过度?
Clin Med (Lond). 2018 Jun;18(3):196-200. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-3-196.
9
Overtesting and undertesting in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基层医疗中的过度检测与检测不足:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 11;8(2):e018557. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018557.
10
Epidemiology of iron deficiency anaemia in four European countries: a population-based study in primary care.四个欧洲国家缺铁性贫血的流行病学:一项基于初级保健的人群研究。
Eur J Haematol. 2016 Dec;97(6):583-593. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12776. Epub 2016 Jun 8.