• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深入实验室:一种用于推荐实验室检查的人工智能方法

Deep into Laboratory: An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Recommend Laboratory Tests.

作者信息

Islam Md Mohaimenul, Poly Tahmina Nasrin, Yang Hsuan-Chia, Li Yu-Chuan Jack

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.

International Center for Health Information Technology (ICHIT), Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 29;11(6):990. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11060990.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics11060990
PMID:34072571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8227070/
Abstract

Laboratory tests are performed to make effective clinical decisions. However, inappropriate laboratory test ordering hampers patient care and increases financial burden for healthcare. An automated laboratory test recommendation system can provide rapid and appropriate test selection, potentially improving the workflow to help physicians spend more time treating patients. The main objective of this study was to develop a deep learning-based automated system to recommend appropriate laboratory tests. A retrospective data collection was performed at the National Health Insurance database between 1 January 2013, and 31 December 2013. We included all prescriptions that had at least one laboratory test. A total of 1,463,837 prescriptions from 530,050 unique patients was included in our study. Of these patients, 296,541 were women (55.95%), the range of age was between 1 and 107 years. The deep learning (DL) model achieved a higher area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC micro = 0.98, and AUROC macro = 0.94). The findings of this study show that the DL model can accurately and efficiently identify laboratory tests. This model can be integrated into existing workflows to reduce under- and over-utilization problems.

摘要

进行实验室检查是为了做出有效的临床决策。然而,不恰当的实验室检查医嘱会妨碍患者护理,并增加医疗保健的经济负担。一个自动化的实验室检查推荐系统可以提供快速且恰当的检查选择,有可能改善工作流程,帮助医生有更多时间治疗患者。本研究的主要目的是开发一个基于深度学习的自动化系统来推荐合适的实验室检查。在国民健康保险数据库中于2013年1月1日至2013年12月31日进行了回顾性数据收集。我们纳入了所有至少有一项实验室检查的处方。我们的研究纳入了来自530,050名独特患者的总共1,463,837张处方。在这些患者中,296,541名是女性(55.95%),年龄范围在1岁至107岁之间。深度学习(DL)模型在受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC微值 = 0.98,AUROC宏值 = 0.94)方面表现更高。本研究结果表明,DL模型能够准确且高效地识别实验室检查。该模型可以整合到现有工作流程中,以减少检查使用不足和过度使用的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/7d53d573f6f3/diagnostics-11-00990-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/c79fb40eb6b7/diagnostics-11-00990-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/b96fff54465d/diagnostics-11-00990-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/ac5949792285/diagnostics-11-00990-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/1367da62b187/diagnostics-11-00990-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/240e4b879095/diagnostics-11-00990-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/acdf5aa5f767/diagnostics-11-00990-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/9b6f55cb409c/diagnostics-11-00990-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/7d53d573f6f3/diagnostics-11-00990-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/c79fb40eb6b7/diagnostics-11-00990-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/b96fff54465d/diagnostics-11-00990-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/ac5949792285/diagnostics-11-00990-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/1367da62b187/diagnostics-11-00990-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/240e4b879095/diagnostics-11-00990-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/acdf5aa5f767/diagnostics-11-00990-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/9b6f55cb409c/diagnostics-11-00990-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af7/8227070/7d53d573f6f3/diagnostics-11-00990-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Deep into Laboratory: An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Recommend Laboratory Tests.深入实验室:一种用于推荐实验室检查的人工智能方法
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 29;11(6):990. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11060990.
2
Development of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Automated Recommendation System for Clinical Laboratory Tests: Retrospective Analysis of the National Health Insurance Database.基于人工智能的临床检验自动化推荐系统的开发:国民健康保险数据库的回顾性分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Nov 18;8(11):e24163. doi: 10.2196/24163.
3
Artificial Intelligence-Based Multimodal Risk Assessment Model for Surgical Site Infection (AMRAMS): Development and Validation Study.基于人工智能的手术部位感染多模态风险评估模型(AMRAMS):开发与验证研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jun 15;8(6):e18186. doi: 10.2196/18186.
4
Comparison of Chest Radiograph Interpretations by Artificial Intelligence Algorithm vs Radiology Residents.人工智能算法与放射科住院医师对胸部 X 线片解读的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2022779. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22779.
5
Medical Specialty Recommendations by an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot on a Smartphone: Development and Deployment.智能手机人工智能聊天机器人的医学专业推荐:开发与部署。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 6;23(5):e27460. doi: 10.2196/27460.
6
DeepDRG: Performance of Artificial Intelligence Model for Real-Time Prediction of Diagnosis-Related Groups.深度疾病诊断相关分组:用于实时预测疾病诊断相关分组的人工智能模型性能
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 25;9(12):1632. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121632.
7
Automated identification of chest radiographs with referable abnormality with deep learning: need for recalibration.深度学习自动识别有参考价值的异常胸片:需要重新校准。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6902-6912. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07062-7. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
8
Development and Performance of the Pulmonary Embolism Result Forecast Model (PERFORM) for Computed Tomography Clinical Decision Support.用于计算机断层扫描临床决策支持的肺栓塞结果预测模型 (PERFORM) 的开发和性能。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198719. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8719.
9
Automated semantic labeling of pediatric musculoskeletal radiographs using deep learning.使用深度学习对儿科肌肉骨骼 X 光片进行自动语义标注。
Pediatr Radiol. 2019 Jul;49(8):1066-1070. doi: 10.1007/s00247-019-04408-2. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
10
Primary care physicians' challenges in ordering clinical laboratory tests and interpreting results.基层医疗医生在开具临床实验室检验医嘱和解读检验结果方面面临的挑战。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;27(2):268-74. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.02.130104.

引用本文的文献

1
Revolutionizing Laboratory Practices: Pioneering Trends in Total Laboratory Automation.变革实验室实践:全实验室自动化的前沿趋势
Ann Lab Med. 2025 Sep 1;45(5):472-483. doi: 10.3343/alm.2024.0581. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
2
Leveraging artificial intelligence to reduce diagnostic errors in emergency medicine: Challenges, opportunities, and future directions.利用人工智能减少急诊医学中的诊断错误:挑战、机遇与未来方向。
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;32(3):327-339. doi: 10.1111/acem.15066. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
3
Strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-threats analysis of artificial intelligence in anesthesiology and perioperative medicine.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Micronutrient Laboratory Testing in Switzerland: A 7-Year Retrospective Analysis of Healthcare Claims Data.瑞士微量营养素实验室检测趋势:对医疗保健理赔数据的7年回顾性分析。
Int J Gen Med. 2020 Dec 2;13:1341-1348. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S275406. eCollection 2020.
2
Clinical decision support improves the appropriateness of laboratory test ordering in primary care without increasing diagnostic error: the ELMO cluster randomized trial.临床决策支持可提高初级保健实验室检测申请的适宜性,而不会增加诊断错误:ELMO 聚类随机试验。
Implement Sci. 2020 Nov 4;15(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01059-y.
3
Trends and Between-Physician Variation in Laboratory Testing: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study in General Practice.
麻醉学与围手术期医学中人工智能的优势-劣势-机会-威胁分析
Front Digit Health. 2024 Feb 20;6:1316931. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1316931. eCollection 2024.
4
Artificial Intelligence in Dementia: A Bibliometric Study.痴呆症中的人工智能:一项文献计量学研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 19;13(12):2109. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13122109.
5
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Classification of Thyroid Nodules: An Update.人工智能在甲状腺结节诊断与分类中的应用:最新进展
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;15(3):708. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030708.
6
Artificial intelligence and thyroid disease management: considerations for thyroid function tests.人工智能与甲状腺疾病管理:甲状腺功能检测的考虑因素。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2022 Jun 15;32(2):020601. doi: 10.11613/BM.2022.020601.
7
Rise of the Machines: The Inevitable Evolution of Medicine and Medical Laboratories Intertwining with Artificial Intelligence-A Narrative Review.机器崛起:医学与医学实验室与人工智能交织的必然演变——一篇叙述性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Aug 2;11(8):1399. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11081399.
8
Laboratory Demand Management Strategies-An Overview.实验室需求管理策略——概述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 23;11(7):1141. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071141.
实验室检测的趋势及医生之间的差异:一项全科医疗的回顾性纵向研究
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 8;9(6):1787. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061787.
4
Inappropriate use of laboratory tests: How availability triggers demand - Examples across Europe.实验室检测的不当应用:供应如何引发需求——欧洲各地的实例。
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Jun;505:100-107. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.02.017. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
5
Inappropriate laboratory testing in internal medicine inpatients: Prevalence, causes and interventions.内科住院患者不适当的实验室检查:患病率、原因及干预措施。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Feb 7;51:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.02.002. eCollection 2020 Mar.
6
Cascades of Care After Incidental Findings in a US National Survey of Physicians.美国全国医师调查中偶然发现的后续医疗处理。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1913325. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13325.
7
Temporal trends in use of tests in UK primary care, 2000-15: retrospective analysis of 250 million tests.英国初级保健中检测的使用趋势,2000-15 年:2.5 亿次检测的回顾性分析。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4666. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4666.
8
Laboratory testing in primary care: A systematic review of health IT impacts.基层医疗中的实验室检测:健康信息技术影响的系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Aug;116:52-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 May 21.
9
Overtesting and undertesting in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基层医疗中的过度检测与检测不足:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 11;8(2):e018557. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018557.
10
Evidence-Based Guidelines to Eliminate Repetitive Laboratory Testing.基于证据的消除实验室重复检测指南。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 1;177(12):1833-1839. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.5152.