• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

金砖国家中民主对二氧化碳排放的直接和间接影响:面板分位数回归的证据。

The direct and indirect effects of democracy on carbon dioxide emissions in BRICS countries: evidence from panel quantile regression.

机构信息

College of Finance and Statistics, Hunan University, Changsha, China.

College of Business Administration, Hunan University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Sep;27(26):33085-33102. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09167-4. Epub 2020 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-09167-4
PMID:32529624
Abstract

This paper illustrates the direct and indirect effects of democracy on CO emissions in the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) from 1992 to 2018. In view of the distribution heterogeneity of CO emissions, the panel quantile regression model is especially used to explore the nexus among different variables. Furthermore, in order to predict the trends of CO emissions in different countries, we also estimate the kernel density function of CO emissions in the BRICS countries by the quantile-fitted values. The results indicate that the direct impact of democracy on carbon dioxide emissions is significantly negative and great at high-emission countries. Although the indirect effect of democracy is positive in China and negative in Brazil and South Africa, the total effect of democracy on CO emissions remains negative in all BRICS countries. The estimation of kernel density function shows that the distribution of CO emissions in each country is gradually concentrated. Moreover, there is an environmental Kuznets curve depicting the linkage of urbanization and carbon dioxide emissions in Brazil and South Africa. These findings further highlight that the impact of democracy on high-emission and low-emission countries should be taken into account in policymaking to achieve sustainable developments.

摘要

本文阐述了 1992 年至 2018 年间,金砖国家(巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非)民主对二氧化碳排放的直接和间接影响。鉴于二氧化碳排放的分布异质性,我们特别使用面板分位数回归模型来探讨不同变量之间的关系。此外,为了预测金砖国家二氧化碳排放的趋势,我们还通过分位数拟合值来估计金砖国家二氧化碳排放的核密度函数。结果表明,民主对二氧化碳排放的直接影响在高排放国家具有显著的负向影响。尽管民主的间接效应在中国为正,在巴西和南非为负,但民主对二氧化碳排放的总效应在金砖国家仍为负。核密度函数的估计表明,每个国家的二氧化碳排放分布逐渐集中。此外,巴西和南非的城市化和二氧化碳排放之间存在一条环境库兹涅茨曲线。这些发现进一步强调,在制定政策时,应考虑民主对高排放和低排放国家的影响,以实现可持续发展。

相似文献

1
The direct and indirect effects of democracy on carbon dioxide emissions in BRICS countries: evidence from panel quantile regression.金砖国家中民主对二氧化碳排放的直接和间接影响:面板分位数回归的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Sep;27(26):33085-33102. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09167-4. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
2
The heterogeneous effects of urbanization and income inequality on CO emissions in BRICS economies: evidence from panel quantile regression.城市化和收入不平等对金砖国家 CO 排放的非均匀影响:基于面板分位数回归的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jun;25(17):17176-17193. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1900-y. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
3
Financial development, globalization, and CO emission in the presence of EKC: evidence from BRICS countries.金融发展、全球化与 CO 排放的 EKC 关系:金砖国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Nov;25(31):31283-31296. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3034-7. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
4
Asymmetric effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on carbon emissions of BRICS economies: evidence from nonlinear panel autoregressive distributed lag model.能源效率和可再生能源对金砖国家经济碳排放的非对称影响:来自非线性面板自回归分布滞后模型的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(15):18254-18268. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08353-8. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
5
Dynamic Nexus between Technological Innovation and Building Sector Carbon Emissions in the BRICS Countries.金砖国家技术创新与建筑部门碳排放的动态关联。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Sep 1;293:112780. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112780. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
6
On the remittances-environment led hypothesis: Empirical evidence from BRICS economies.基于汇款-环境假说的实证研究:来自金砖国家经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(14):16460-16471. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07999-8. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
7
Tourism adaptability amid the climate change and air pollution in BRICS: a method of moments quantile regression approach.金砖国家应对气候变化和空气污染的旅游适应性:矩分位数回归方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(57):86744-86758. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21725-6. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
8
Analysis of income inequality and environmental pollution in BRICS using fresh asymmetric approach.金砖国家收入不平等与环境污染的非对称分析
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(37):51199-51209. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14209-6. Epub 2021 May 12.
9
Impact of stock market, renewable energy consumption and urbanization on environmental degradation: new evidence from BRICS countries.股票市场、可再生能源消费和城市化对环境恶化的影响:来自金砖国家的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(24):31549-31565. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12731-1. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
10
Exploring the impact of innovation, renewable energy consumption, and income on CO2 emissions: new evidence from the BRICS economies.探讨创新、可再生能源消费和收入对二氧化碳排放的影响:来自金砖国家经济体的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(12):13866-13881. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07876-4. Epub 2020 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Democracy, green energy, trade, and environmental progress in South Asia: Advanced quantile regression perspective.南亚的民主、绿色能源、贸易与环境进步:先进分位数回归视角
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 29;9(10):e20488. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20488. eCollection 2023 Oct.