• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

网络推送调查研究方案与邮寄纸质和铅笔问卷方案在“监测未来”面板调查中的比较。

Comparison of a web-push survey research protocol with a mailed paper and pencil protocol in the Monitoring the Future panel survey.

机构信息

Institute for Translational Research in Children's Mental Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, MN, USA.

出版信息

Addiction. 2021 Jan;116(1):191-199. doi: 10.1111/add.15158. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1111/add.15158
PMID:32533797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7736051/
Abstract

AIMS

The experiment tested the effects of a web-push survey research protocol, compared with the standard mailed paper-and-pencil protocol, among young adults aged 19-30 years in the 'Monitoring the Future' (MTF) longitudinal study.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The US-based MTF study has measured substance use trends among young adults in panel samples followed biennially, using consistent mailed survey procedures from 1977 to 2017. In 2018, young adult participants in the MTF longitudinal component scheduled to be surveyed at ages 19-30 in 2018 (from high school senior cohorts of 2006-17, n = 14 709) were randomly assigned to receive the standard mail/paper survey procedures or new web-push procedures.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcomes were responding to the survey and prevalence estimates for past 30-day use of alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana and illicit drugs.

FINDINGS

The web-push response rate was 39.07% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 37.889, 40.258]; this was significantly better than the standard MTF response rate of 35.12% (95% CI = 33.964, 36.285). After adjusting for covariates, the web-push condition was associated with a 19% increase in the odds of responding compared with standard MTF (adjusted odds ratio = 1.188; 95% CI = 1.096, 1.287). Substance use prevalence estimates were very similar and differences became negligible when using attrition weights and controlling for socio-demographic characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

The web-push protocol produced a higher response rate than the mailed pencil and paper protocol in the Monitoring the Future panel study, without substantially affecting estimates of substance use once attrition weights and socio-demographic variables were factored in.

摘要

目的

该实验测试了网络推送调查研究方案的效果,该方案与“监测未来”(MTF)纵向研究中 19-30 岁的年轻人标准邮寄纸笔协议进行了比较。

设计、设置和参与者:美国 MTF 研究使用一致的邮寄调查程序,从 1977 年到 2017 年,对青年成年人的物质使用趋势进行了面板样本跟踪测量。2018 年,MTF 纵向研究部分的年轻成年人参与者计划在 2018 年(来自 2006-17 年高中高年级队列,n=14709)在 19-30 岁时接受调查,他们被随机分配接受标准邮件/纸质调查程序或新的网络推送程序。

测量

主要结果是调查的回应率和过去 30 天使用酒精、香烟、大麻和非法药物的流行率估计值。

结果

网络推送的回复率为 39.07%(95%置信区间[CI]=37.889,40.258);显著高于标准 MTF 回复率 35.12%(95% CI=33.964,36.285)。在调整协变量后,与标准 MTF 相比,网络推送条件与回应的可能性增加 19%相关(调整后的优势比[OR]=1.188;95% CI=1.096,1.287)。物质使用流行率估计值非常相似,当使用损耗权重并控制社会人口特征时,差异变得微不足道。

结论

网络推送协议在“监测未来”小组研究中产生了比邮寄纸笔协议更高的回复率,而在考虑损耗权重和社会人口变量后,对物质使用的估计值没有实质性影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ffd/7818409/3c824c6a28c8/ADD-116-191-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ffd/7818409/1f3ca02e0642/ADD-116-191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ffd/7818409/3c824c6a28c8/ADD-116-191-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ffd/7818409/1f3ca02e0642/ADD-116-191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ffd/7818409/3c824c6a28c8/ADD-116-191-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of a web-push survey research protocol with a mailed paper and pencil protocol in the Monitoring the Future panel survey.网络推送调查研究方案与邮寄纸质和铅笔问卷方案在“监测未来”面板调查中的比较。
Addiction. 2021 Jan;116(1):191-199. doi: 10.1111/add.15158. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
2
Comparison of a web-push vs. mailed survey protocol in the Monitoring the Future panel study among adults ages 35 to 60.在针对35至60岁成年人的“监测未来”小组研究中,网络推送调查协议与邮寄调查协议的比较。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2022 Sep;4. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100089. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
3
Building on a Sequential Mixed-Mode Research Design in the Monitoring the Future Study.基于“监测未来”研究中的序列混合模式研究设计。
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2020 Nov 13;10(1):149-160. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smaa030. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
A Sequential Mixed-Mode Experiment in the U.S. National Monitoring the Future Study.美国“监测未来”研究中的一项序贯混合模式实验。
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2018 Mar;6(1):72-97. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smx011. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
5
Mode effects for collecting alcohol and other drug use data: Web and U.S. mail.收集酒精及其他药物使用数据的方式效应:网络和美国邮政。
J Stud Alcohol. 2002 Nov;63(6):755-61. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2002.63.755.
6
Web-Based Data Collection for Older Adults Living With HIV in a Clinical Research Setting: Pilot Observational Study.基于网络的 HIV 老年感染者临床研究数据收集:初步观察研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 11;22(11):e18588. doi: 10.2196/18588.
7
Comparison of web and mail surveys in collecting illicit drug use data: a randomized experiment.网络调查与邮件调查在收集非法药物使用数据方面的比较:一项随机实验。
J Drug Educ. 2004;34(1):61-72. doi: 10.2190/4HEY-VWXL-DVR3-HAKV.
8
Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians.在一项针对医生的调查中混合使用网络和邮件方式。
Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun;42(3 Pt 1):1219-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00652.x.
9
The influence of response mode on study results: offering cigarette smokers a choice of postal or online completion of a survey.应答方式对研究结果的影响:为吸烟者提供邮寄或在线完成调查问卷的选择。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Oct 21;12(4):e46. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1414.
10
An experimental comparison of web-push vs. paper-only survey procedures for conducting an in-depth health survey of military spouses.关于网络推送与仅纸质调查问卷程序在对军属进行深入健康调查中的实验比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0337-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Nicotine Pouch and E-Cigarette Use and Co-Use Among US Youths in 2023 and 2024.2023年和2024年美国青少年使用尼古丁袋和电子烟及同时使用的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e256739. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.6739.
2
Historical Trends in Cannabis Use Among U.S. Adults Ages 19-55, 2013-2021.美国 19-55 岁成年人 2013-2021 年大麻使用的历史趋势。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024 Jul;85(4):477-486. doi: 10.15288/jsad.23-00169. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
3
Transitioning to a Mixed-Mode Study Design in a National Household Panel Study: Effects on Fieldwork Outcomes, Sample Composition and Costs.

本文引用的文献

1
Building on a Sequential Mixed-Mode Research Design in the Monitoring the Future Study.基于“监测未来”研究中的序列混合模式研究设计。
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2020 Nov 13;10(1):149-160. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smaa030. eCollection 2022 Feb.
2
Two-Year Follow-up of a Sequential Mixed-Mode Experiment in the U.S. National Monitoring the Future Study.美国未来监测研究中一项序贯混合模式实验的两年随访
Surv Pract. 2019;12(1). doi: 10.29115/SP-2019-0003. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
3
Shifting Age of Peak Binge Drinking Prevalence: Historical Changes in Normative Trajectories Among Young Adults Aged 18 to 30.
在一项全国性家庭面板研究中转向混合模式研究设计:对实地调查结果、样本构成和成本的影响。
Surv Res Methods. 2023 Dec 22;17(4):411-427.
4
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.增加邮寄和电子问卷回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub5.
5
Switching from Telephone to Web-First Mixed-Mode Data Collection: Results from the Transition into Adulthood Supplement to the US Panel Study of Income Dynamics.从电话调查转向网络优先的混合模式数据收集:美国收入动态面板研究成年期补充调查转型的结果
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2022 Jul;185(3):933-954. doi: 10.1111/rssa.12840. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
6
Comparison of a web-push vs. mailed survey protocol in the Monitoring the Future panel study among adults ages 35 to 60.在针对35至60岁成年人的“监测未来”小组研究中,网络推送调查协议与邮寄调查协议的比较。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2022 Sep;4. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100089. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
7
The Intersection of Depressive Symptoms, Adverse Childhood Experiences, and Protective Factors Among Adolescents: Epidemiological Evidence from Minnesota, 2016 and 2019.青少年抑郁症状、童年不良经历与保护因素的交集:来自明尼苏达州2016年和2019年的流行病学证据
Advers Resil Sci. 2022;3(1):21-36. doi: 10.1007/s42844-022-00052-2. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
8
Protective Factors for Nicotine and Marijuana Vaping Among U.S. Adolescents.美国青少年尼古丁和大麻蒸气吸入的保护因素。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Mar;62(3):414-421. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.08.022. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
9
Going web or staying paper? The use of web-surveys among older people.上网还是用纸?老年人对网络调查的使用情况。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 8;20(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01138-0.
峰值 binge drinking 流行率的年龄转移:18 至 30 岁年轻人的规范轨迹的历史变化。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 Feb;43(2):287-298. doi: 10.1111/acer.13933. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
4
Simultaneous alcohol and marijuana use among underage young adults in the United States.美国未成年青少年同时使用酒精和大麻的情况。
Addict Behav. 2019 Jan;88:77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
5
A Sequential Mixed-Mode Experiment in the U.S. National Monitoring the Future Study.美国“监测未来”研究中的一项序贯混合模式实验。
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2018 Mar;6(1):72-97. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smx011. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
6
Longitudinal patterns of marijuana use across ages 18-50 in a US national sample: A descriptive examination of predictors and health correlates of repeated measures latent class membership.美国全国样本中18至50岁人群大麻使用的纵向模式:重复测量潜在类别成员资格的预测因素及健康关联的描述性分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Feb 1;171:70-83. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
7
Intoxication and binge and high-intensity drinking among US young adults in their mid-20s.美国25岁左右的年轻成年人中的中毒、暴饮暴食和高强度饮酒现象。
Subst Abus. 2016 Oct-Dec;37(4):597-605. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2016.1178681. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
8
Participation rates in epidemiologic studies.流行病学研究中的参与率。
Ann Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;17(9):643-53. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.013. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
9
25-year trends and socio-demographic differences in response rates: Finnish adult health behaviour survey.应答率的25年趋势及社会人口学差异:芬兰成人健康行为调查
Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(6):409-15. doi: 10.1007/s10654-006-9019-8. Epub 2006 Jun 28.