Callas Peter W, Solomon Laura J, Hughes John R, Livingston Amy E
Medical Biostatistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405-0082, USA.
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Oct 21;12(4):e46. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1414.
It is unclear whether offering online data collection to study participants affects compliance or produces bias.
To compare response rates, baseline characteristics, test-retest reliability, and outcomes between cigarette smokers who chose to complete a survey by mail versus those who chose to complete it online.
We surveyed cigarette smokers who intended to stop smoking within the next 30 days to determine barriers to calling a smoking quit line. Participants were offered the choice of completing a paper version of the survey sent through the mail or an online version at a password-protected website. Participants were called 2 months later to determine if they had made a quit attempt and/or called a smoking quit line since the baseline survey. We compared characteristics and outcomes among those who chose postal versus online completion. We measured test-retest reliability of the baseline survey by re-surveying a semi-random sample of participants within 10 days of the original survey.
Of 697 eligible respondents to newspaper ads in 12 US cities, 438 (63%) chose to receive a mailed paper survey and 259 (37%) chose an Internet survey. Survey return rates were the same for the 2 modes (92% versus 92%, P = .82). Online respondents were younger (mean of 46 versus 51 years old for postal, P < .001), more likely to be white (76% versus 62%, P < .001), less likely to be African American (18% versus 30%, P < .001), more highly educated (34% college graduate versus 23%, P < .001), more likely to intend to stop smoking in the next 30 days (47% definitely versus 30%, P < .001), and more likely to have heard of a smoking quit line (51% versus 40%, P = .008). Participants did not differ on gender (54% female for online versus 55% for postal, P = .72) or cigarettes smoked per day (mean of 19 versus 21, P = .30). Online respondents had slightly fewer missing items on the 79-item survey (mean of 1.7% missing versus 2.3%, P = .02). Loss to follow-up at 2 months was similar (16% for online and 15% for postal, P = .74). There was no significant difference between online and postal respondents in having called a smoking quit line during the 2-month follow-up period (20% versus 24%, P = .22) or in having made a quit attempt (76% versus 79%, P = .41).
Cigarette smokers who chose to complete a survey using the Internet differed in several ways from those who chose mailed surveys. However, more importantly, online and postal responses produced similar outcomes.
向研究参与者提供在线数据收集方式是否会影响依从性或产生偏差尚不清楚。
比较选择通过邮寄方式完成调查问卷的吸烟者与选择在线完成调查问卷的吸烟者之间的回复率、基线特征、重测信度和结果。
我们对打算在未来30天内戒烟的吸烟者进行了调查,以确定拨打戒烟热线的障碍。参与者可以选择完成通过邮件发送的纸质版调查问卷,或者在一个设有密码保护的网站上完成在线版调查问卷。2个月后致电参与者,以确定自基线调查以来他们是否尝试戒烟和/或拨打过戒烟热线。我们比较了选择邮寄方式与在线方式完成调查问卷的参与者的特征和结果。通过在原始调查的10天内对部分参与者进行半随机重新调查,我们测量了基线调查的重测信度。
在美国12个城市的报纸广告的697名合格受访者中,438人(63%)选择接收邮寄的纸质调查问卷,259人(37%)选择网络调查问卷。两种方式的调查问卷回复率相同(92%对92%,P = 0.82)。在线受访者更年轻(平均年龄46岁,邮寄方式的为51岁,P < 0.001),更可能是白人(76%对62%,P < 0.001),不太可能是非洲裔美国人(18%对30%,P < 0.001),受教育程度更高(34%为大学毕业生,邮寄方式的为23%,P < 0.001),更有可能打算在未来30天内戒烟(47%肯定会,邮寄方式的为30%,P < 0.001),并且更有可能听说过戒烟热线(51%对40%,P = 0.008)。参与者在性别方面没有差异(在线方式的54%为女性,邮寄方式的为55%,P = 0.72),或者每天吸烟量方面也没有差异(平均19支对21支,P = 0.30)。在线受访者在79项调查问卷上的缺失项目略少(平均缺失1.7%,邮寄方式的为2.3%,P = 0.02)。2个月时的失访情况相似(在线方式的为16%,邮寄方式的为15%,P = 0.74)。在2个月的随访期内,在线受访者和邮寄受访者在拨打戒烟热线方面(20%对24%,P = 0.22)或尝试戒烟方面(76%对79%,P = 0.41)没有显著差异。
选择通过互联网完成调查问卷的吸烟者在几个方面与选择邮寄调查问卷的吸烟者不同。然而,更重要的是,在线和邮寄回复产生了相似的结果。