Ziouziou Imad, Ammouri Safaa, Ouazni Mohammed, Sumba Harrison, Koutani Abdellatif, Iben Attya Andaloussi Ahmed
Service d'urologie, CHU d'Agadir, Agadir, Morocco; Equipe de recherche en médecine translationnelle et épidémiologie, Laboratoire des sciences de la santé, Faculté de médecine et de pharmacie, Université Ibn Zohr, Agadir, Morocco.
Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et d'endoscopie gynécologique, Maternité Soussi, CHU Ibn Sina, Faculté de médecine et de pharmacie, Université Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco.
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;72:147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.05.059. Epub 2020 May 30.
Rectovaginal fistula (RVF) is defined as an abnormal communication between the anterior wall of the rectum and the posterior wall of the vagina. Many surgical techniques have been described in the treatment of RVF. However, none has proved its superiority. The aim of the study was to evaluate the functional results of surgical treatment of RVF using Martius and Falandry techniques in order to assess the feasibility and the efficacy of these techniques which were first described for vesico-vaginal fistulas.
The study was a retrospective case series conducted in a single centre: Department of general surgery at Ibn Sina University Hospital in Rabat. We included patients with rectovaginal fistula consecutively recruited from 2011 to 2014. 10 patients developed RVF after surgery for rectal cancer (9 cases), uterine cancer (1 case). One patient had RVF for ano-rectal malformation. Colostomy was performed before the treatment of fistula in 9 cases (82 %). They underwent surgical treatment using Falandry (8 patients) and Martius techniques (3 patients) performed by an experienced urologist surgeon.
No postoperative complications were recorded. Time to discharge was postoperative day 3-4. There was a complete disappearance of RVF in 8 patients (72.7 % of cases), relapse in 2 cases (18 %), and failure in one case (9%). The average follow-up was 12.6 +/-10 months. Functionally, no long-term cases of fecal incontinence or dyspareunia were noted.
The choice of surgical technique in the treatment of RVF remains difficult because of poor literature data and absence of consensus. RVF repair results either by Martius or Falandry techniques are encouraging with low morbidity.
直肠阴道瘘(RVF)被定义为直肠前壁与阴道后壁之间的异常通道。在直肠阴道瘘的治疗中,已经描述了许多手术技术。然而,没有一种技术证明其优越性。本研究的目的是评估使用马尔蒂乌斯(Martius)和法朗德里(Falandry)技术对直肠阴道瘘进行手术治疗的功能结果,以评估这些最初用于膀胱阴道瘘的技术的可行性和疗效。
本研究是在单一中心——拉巴特伊本·西那大学医院普通外科进行的一项回顾性病例系列研究。我们纳入了2011年至2014年连续招募的直肠阴道瘘患者。10例患者在直肠癌手术后发生直肠阴道瘘(9例),子宫癌手术后发生直肠阴道瘘(1例)。1例患者因肛门直肠畸形出现直肠阴道瘘。9例(82%)患者在瘘管治疗前进行了结肠造口术。他们接受了由经验丰富的泌尿外科医生使用法朗德里技术(8例患者)和马尔蒂乌斯技术(3例患者)进行的手术治疗。
未记录到术后并发症。出院时间为术后第3 - 4天。8例患者(72.7%的病例)直肠阴道瘘完全消失,2例复发(18%),1例失败(9%)。平均随访时间为12.6±10个月。在功能方面,未发现长期粪便失禁或性交困难病例。
由于文献数据不足且缺乏共识,直肠阴道瘘治疗中手术技术的选择仍然困难。采用马尔蒂乌斯或法朗德里技术修复直肠阴道瘘的结果令人鼓舞,发病率较低。