Long-term results of accelerated and conventional corneal cross-linking.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the long-term follow-up outcomes of traditional and accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL) for keratoconus.

METHODS

This retrospective comparative cohort study included patients with keratoconus who underwent corneal cross-linking (CXL) between August 2008 and December 2016. Patients treated before August 2013 underwent the traditional Dresden protocol, and those treated subsequently received the accelerated protocol, i.e., 0.1% riboflavin soaking for 10 min, followed by pulsed UV-A irradiation at 30 mW/cm for 8 min, and a total irradiation power of 7.2 J/cm. The primary outcome was the success rate in halting the disease progression. The postoperative changes in visual acuity, keratometry readings, endothelial cell count and complications following accelerated CXL and conventional CXL were compared.

RESULTS

This study evaluated 113 eyes over a mean follow-up period of 37.61 ± 16.34 months. It was found that 89.6% and 95.7% of the eyes were successfully treated with the traditional and accelerated protocols, respectively (p = 0.239). The corrected-distance visual acuity improved in both groups, but it was significantly better following the accelerated protocol (p = 0.037). Traditional protocol group had more postoperative complications than the accelerated group (8.9% versus 2%), although not reaching statistically significant difference (p = 0.142). There were no significant differences in the topographic (p = 0.122) and refractive (p = 0.570) outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Accelerated CXL and conventional CXL are both safe and effective, and the long-term follow-up showed that the accelerated protocol was similar to the standard one in terms of halting keratoconus and achieving visual outcomes. Because of its potential benefits, the accelerated protocol may be considered for the treatment of progressive keratoconus.