Kamel George N, De Ruiter Brandon J, Baghdasarian Daniel, Mostafa Evan, Levin Avinoam, Davidson Edward H
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, N.Y.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Dec 20;7(12):e2506. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002506. eCollection 2019 Dec.
Treatment of mandibular condyle fractures is controversial. Open treatment achieves anatomic reduction with occlusal stability and faster functional recovery but risks facial nerve injury and jeopardizes joint capsule circulation which can lead to bone resorption. Traditional closed treatment avoids these issues but requires prolonged fixation and risks subsequent facial asymmetry, occlusal disturbance, and ankylosis. Rather than wires, closed treatment with elastics allows for customizable management of a healing fracture with ability to alter vector and degree of traction to restore vertical height and occlusion with less discomfort and decreased risk for ankylosis. In this protocol, unilateral condylar fractures were treated with class II elastics ipsilateral to injury and class I contralaterally. Class III elastics were used contralaterally if additional traction was required and Class II elastics were placed bilaterally for bilateral fractures. Patients were sequentially advanced from fixating to guiding to supportive elastics by titrating elastic vector to any dental midline incongruency or chin deviation. Six patients were treated with this protocol with six-month follow-up. Fracture patterns included displaced and dislocated fractures as well as intracapsular and extracapsular condylar fractures. All patients at completion of the protocol had objective centric occlusion with no subjective malocclusion, chin deviation, facial asymmetry, or temporomandibular joint pain. These early data demonstrate a safe and efficacious innovative protocol for closed treatment of mandibular condylar fractures with dynamic elastic therapy.
下颌髁突骨折的治疗存在争议。开放治疗可实现解剖复位,具有咬合稳定性且功能恢复更快,但有面神经损伤风险,并危及关节囊血液循环,可能导致骨质吸收。传统的闭合治疗可避免这些问题,但需要长时间固定,且有继发面部不对称、咬合紊乱和关节强直的风险。与钢丝固定不同,弹性绷带闭合治疗允许对愈合骨折进行可定制的管理,能够改变牵引向量和程度,以恢复垂直高度和咬合,不适感更小,关节强直风险降低。在本方案中,单侧髁突骨折采用损伤同侧的II类弹性绷带和对侧的I类弹性绷带进行治疗。如果需要额外牵引,则对侧使用III类弹性绷带;双侧骨折则双侧放置II类弹性绷带。通过调整弹性绷带向量以纠正任何牙中线不一致或下巴偏斜,患者依次从固定弹性绷带过渡到引导弹性绷带,再到支持弹性绷带。6例患者按照该方案进行治疗,并进行了6个月的随访。骨折类型包括移位和脱位骨折以及囊内和囊外髁突骨折。在方案完成时,所有患者均达到客观的正中咬合,无主观咬合不正、下巴偏斜、面部不对称或颞下颌关节疼痛。这些早期数据表明,动态弹性疗法是一种安全有效的下颌髁突骨折闭合治疗创新方案。